Well Recovery, Drainage Area, and Future Drill-Well Inventory: Empirical Study of the Barnett Shale Gas Play
- Svetlana Ikonnikova (University of Texas at Austin) | John Browning (University of Texas at Austin) | Susan Christine Horvath (University of Texas at Austin) | Scott Tinker (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- November 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 484 - 496
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 5.8.2 Shale Gas
- well drainage area, attrition , refracturing, well interference
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,021 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The work is focused on one of the oldest and largest developed shale-gas plays - the Barnett shale. The primary objective is to bring more clarity and granularity to the Barnett resource estimation. The second task is to develop a resource-estimation methodology that one can use to evaluate other shale-gas plays in an attempt to determine their potential for development. We compile a comprehensive database, including production histories of more than 16,000 drilled wells and calibrated density log porosity and net-pay-zone-thickness maps. The data are used to estimate (1) the remaining technically recoverable free-gas resource, (2) individual-well recoveries, (3) areas drained by the existing wells, and (4) the future drill-well inventory. On the basis of the geographical distribution of individual-well estimated ultimate recoveries, we divide the Barnett acreage into 10 tiers. We describe the future drill-well inventory for each tier. In addition, to assess the potential contribution of refracturing to the future Barnett production, we develop a statistical procedure to identify wells that are likely to be refractured and then analyze their performances.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Browning, J., Ikonnikova, S., Glen, G. et al. 2012. Barnett Shale Production Model and Economics. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Trans. 62: 669–670.
Chow, Gregory C. 1960. Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions. Econometrica 28 (3): 591–605.
Curtis, J.B. 2002. Fractured Shale-Gas Systems. AAPG Bull. 86 (11): 1921–1938.
Economides, M.J. and Nolte, K.G. 2000. Reservoir Stimulation, third edition, New York and Chichester: Wiley.
EIA. 2011. Review of Emerging Resources: US Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays.
Fu, Q., Horvath, S., Potter, E. et al. 2013. Log-Based Thickness and Porosity Mapping of the Barnett Shale Play, Fort Worth Basin, Texas: A Proxy for Reservoir Quality Assessment. Presented at the US Association for Energy Economics, Workshop: Unconventional Gas and Oil, Austin, Texas.
GAO. 2012. information on shale resources, development, and environmental and public health risks report to congressional requesters. United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-12-732, September.
Hale, B. and Cobb, W. 2010. Barnett Shale: A Resources Play-Locally Random and Regionally Complex. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Morgantown, West Virginia, 13–15 October. SPE-138987-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/138987-MS.
Hayden, J. and Pursell, D. 2005. The Barnett Shale: Visitors Guide to the Hottest Gas Play in the US. Pickering Energy Partner, Inc.
IEA. 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012. International Energy Agency.
Jenkins, C. and Boyer, C. 2008. Coalbed- and Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Distinguished Author Series. J Pet Technol February: 92–99. SPE-103514-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103514-PA.
Kalantari-Dahaghi, S. and Mohaghegh, A. 2009. Top-Down Intelligent Reservoir Modeling of New Albany Shale. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Charleston, West Virginia, 23–25 September. SPE-125859-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125859-MS.
Kuuskraa, V. 2010. Case Study 1. Barnett Shale: The Start of the Gas Shale Revolution. Presented at the Advanced Resources International, Inc., Gas Shale Development Workshop, Beijing, China, April.
Lancaster, D.E., McKetta, Steve, and Lowry, P.H. 1993. Research Findings Help Characterize Fort Worth Basin’s Barnett Shale. O & Gas J.91 (10): 59–64.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E.P., Warpinski, N.R. et al. 2010. What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume? SPE Prod & Oper 25 (1): 89–98. SPE-119890-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119890-PA.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E.P., and Youngblood, J.E. 2006. Integration of Microseismic-Fracture-Mapping Results With Numerical Fracture Network Production Modeling in the Barnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–27 September. SPE-102103-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102103-MS.
Mian, M.A. 1992. Petroleum Engineering Handbook for the Practicing Engineer 1.
Montgomery, S., Jarvie, D., Bowker, K. et al. 2005. Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth basin, North-Central Texas: Gas-Shale Play With Multitrillion Cubic Foot Potential. AAPG Bull. 89 (2): 155–175.
NETL. 2011. A Comparative Study of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, and Devonian Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin. National Energy Technology Laboratory Report DOE NETL-2011-1478.
Nobakht, M., Mattar, L., Moghadam, S. et al. 2012. Simplified Forecasting of Tight/Shale-Gas Production in Linear Flow. J Can Pet Technol 51 (6): 476–486. SPE-133615-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133615-PA.
NPC. 2007. Unconventional Gas. Topic Paper 29, Working Document of the NPC Global Oil & Gas Study, ed. S. Holditch, July 18.
Patterson, C. 2009. Barnett vs. Marcellus: Champion vs. a Challenger Which One Is Better? Presented at the Fort Worth Business Press Barnett Shale Symposium, Fort Worth, Texas, 18 June.
Patzek, T.W., Male, F, and M. Marder. 2012. Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory. PNAS 2013, 110 (49) 19731-19736; published ahead of print November 18, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313380110.
PEP. 2005. The Barnett Shale visitors guide to the hottest gas play in the US. Pickering Energy Partners Inc. Report, October 2005.
PGC. 2013. Potential supply of natural gas in the United States. Report of the Potential Gas Committee. December 12, 2012
Pollastro, R.M. 2007. Total Petroleum System Assessment of Undiscovered Resources in the Giant Barnett Shale Continuous (Unconventional) Gas Accumulation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas. Bull. 91 (4): 551–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/06200606007.
Reeves, S.R., Kuuskraa, V.A., and Hill, D.G. 1996. New Basins Invigorate US Gas Shales Play. Oil &Gas J. 94 (4): 53–58.
Strickland, R., Purvis, D., and Blasingame, T. 2011. Practical Aspects of Reserve Determinations for Shale Gas. Presented at the SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 12–16 June. SPE 144357-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144357-MS.
Techbits. 2006. Refracturing in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. J Pet Technol March. SPE-50912-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/50912-PA.
USGS. 2012a. Variability of distributions of well-scale estimated ultimate recovery for continues (unconventional) oil and gas resources in the United States. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2012-1118.
USGS. 2012b. National assessment of oil and gas project map of assessed shale gas in the United States. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS69Z.
Ver Hoeve, M.C., Preusser, M.J., and Makowitz, A. 2010. Basin-Wide Delineation of Gas Shale “Sweet Spots” Using Density and Neutron Logs: Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Gas Shale Resources. Poster presented at the AAPG Hedberg Conference, Austin, Texas, 5–10 December.