Gas/Oil Relative Permeability Normalization: Effects of Permeability, Wettability, and Interfacial Tension
- Amir Jahanbakhsh (Heriot-Watt University) | Hamidreza Shahverdi (Isfahan University of Technology) | Mehran Sohrabi (Heriot-Watt University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- October 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 673 - 682
- 2016.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Wettability, Relative Permeability, Interfacial Tension, Normalization
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 822 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Relative permeabilities (kr) are crucial flow functions governing the fluid distribution within and production from petroleum reservoirs under various oil-recovery methods. To obtain these important reservoir parameters, conventionally, it is required to take rock samples from the reservoir and perform appropriate laboratory measurements. Although kr is expressed as a function of fluid saturation, it is now well-known that kr values are affected by pore structure and distribution, absolute permeability, wettability, interfacial tension (IFT), and saturation history. These rock/fluid properties often change from one region of the reservoir to another, but it would be impossible to perform kr measurements for all regions of a reservoir. Generally, performing experiments on a core with higher permeability is faster and easier than a low-permeability rock. Therefore, assuming all other parameters such as wettability, IFT, and displacement direction are the same for two rocks with different permeabilities, the question becomes how do we estimate the kr of a rock with lower permeability from available (measured) kr of a higher-permeability rock? How do we account for wettability and IFT differences? A normalization technique has been proposed to remove the effect of irreducible water and trapped saturations, which would be different under different conditions. The relative permeabilities can then be denormalized and assigned to different regions (rock types) of the reservoir on the basis of their own irreducible water and trapped saturations. The objective of this study is to introduce a methodology to predict the gas/oil kr for new rock/fluid conditions (such as permeability, wettability, and IFT) by use of existing gas/oil kr data measured at different conditions. By use of measured data from coreflood experiments, we show that by applying an appropriate normalization technique one can adequately predict kr of rocks with different permeability and wettability conditions in two-phase gas/oil flow. However, the results show that the effect of IFT change cannot be captured by normalization techniques. To improve the methodology, a new hypothesis is introduced and proposed here on the basis of dynamic trap saturation. Finally, by use of our experimental data, we evaluate the validity of the Coats (1980) IFT scaling method. We demonstrate the shortcomings of the method and offer an improvement to its prediction.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Al-Wahaibi, Y. M., Grattoni, C. A. and Muggeridge, A. H. 2006. Drainage and Imbibition Relative Permeabilities at Near Miscible Conditions. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 53 (3–4): 239–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.06.005.
Asar, H. and Handy, L. L. 1988. Influence of Interfacial Tension on Gas/Oil Relative Permeability in a Gas-Condensate System. SPE Res Eval & Eng 3 (1): 257–264. SPE-11740-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11740-PA.
Bardon, C. and Longeron, D. G. 1980. Influence of Very Low Interfacial Tensions on Relative Permeability. SPE J. 20 (5): 391–401. SPE-7609-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/7609-PA.
Carlson, F. M. 1981. Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Nonwetting Phase. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 4–7 October. SPE-10157-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10157-MS.
Chen, H. L., Wilson, S. D. and Monger-McClure, T. G. 1999. Determination of Relative Permeability and Recovery for North Sea Gas-Condensate Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (4): 393–402. SPE-57596-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/57596-PA.
Coats, K. H. 1980. An Equation of State Compositional Model. SPE J. 20 (5): 363–376. SPE-8284-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8284-PA.
Danesh, A., Todd, A. C., Somerville, J. et al. 1990. Direct Measurement of Interfacial Tension, Density, Volume, and Compositions of Gas-Condensate System. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 68 (4): 325–330.
Fatemi, S. M., Sohrabi, M., Ireland, S. et al. 2012. Recovery Mechanisms and Relative Permeability for Oil/Gas System at Near-miscible Conditions: Effects of Immobile Water Saturation, Wettability, Hysteresis and Permeability. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 14–18 April. SPE-154277-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/154277-MS.
Fatemi, S. M., Sohrabi, M., Jamiolahmady, M., et al. 2011. Experimental Investigation of Near-Miscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Injection Performance in Water-wet and Mixed-wet Systems. Presented at Offshore Europe, Aberdeen, 6–8 September. SPE-145191-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/145191-MS.
Harbert, L. W. 1983. Low Interfacial Tension Relative Permeability. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, 5–8 October. SPE-12171-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12171-MS.
Henderson, G. D., Danesh, A., Tehrani, et al. 1997. The Effect of Velocity and Interfacial Tension on Relative Permeability of Gas Condensate Fluids in the Wellbore Region. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 17 (3–4): 265–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(96)00048-4.
Henderson, G. D., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D. H. et al. 1998. Measurement and Correlation of Gas Condensate Relative Permeability by the Steady-State Method. SPE J. 1 (2): 134–140. SPE-31065-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/31065-PA.
Land, C. S. 1968. Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow from Rock Properties. Presented at SPE Annual Fall Meeting, Houston, Texas, 1–4 October.
Mawla, R. A. and Al-Saadoon, F. T. 1978. Normalization Techniques and Interpretive Practices of Relative Permeability Curves of Reservoir Rocks. Presented at the SPWLA 19th Annual Logging Symposium, El Paso, Texas, 13–16 June. SPWLA-1978-J.
McDougall, S. R., Salino, P. A. and Sorbie, K. S. 1997. The Effect of Interfacial Tension Upon Gas-Oil Relative Permeability Measurements: Interpretation Using Pore-Scale Models. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5–8 October. SPE-38920-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38920-MS.
Shahverdi, H., Sohrabi, M. and Jamiolahmady, M. 2011. A New Algorithm for Estimating Three-Phase Relative Permeability from Unsteady-State Core Experiments. Transport Porous Med. 90 (3): 911–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11242-011-9823-9.
Shahverdi, H., Sohrabi, M., Fatemi, S. M. et al. 2013. Investigation of Two-Phase and Three-Phase Relative Permeability in Different Rocks with Similar Pore Size Distribution. Presented at the EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec, London, 10–13 June. SPE-164789-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164789-MS.
Sohrabi, M., Tehrani, D. H. and Al-Abri, M. 2007. Performance of Near-Miscible Gas and SWAG Injection in a Mixed-Wet Core. Oral presentation of paper SCA2007-26 given at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Calgary, 10–12 September.
Spiteri, E. J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M. J. et al. 2008. A New Model of Trapping and Relative Permeability Hysteresis for All Wettability Characteristics. SPE J. 13 (3): 277–288. SPE-96448-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/96448-PA.
Whitson, C. H., Fevang, Ø. and Sævareid, A. 1999. Gas Condensate Relative Permeability for Well Calculations. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, 3–6 October. SPE-56476-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/56476-MS.