Integration of Cumulative-Distribution-Function Mapping With Principal-Component Analysis for the History Matching of Channelized Reservoirs
- Chaohui Chen (Shell International Exploration and Production) | Guohua Gao (Shell Global Solutions US Inc.) | Paul Gelderblom (Shell Global Solutions International) | Eduardo Jimenez (Shell)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 278 - 293
- 2016.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- geological facies, channelized reservoirs, history matching, Principle component analysis
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 308 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Although principal-component analysis (PCA) has been widely applied to effectively reduce the number of parameters characterizing a reservoir, its disadvantages are well-recognized by researchers. First, PCA may distort the probability-distribution function (PDF) of the original model, especially for non-Gaussian properties such as facies indicator or permeability field of a fluvial reservoir. Second, it smears the boundaries between different facies. Therefore, the models reconstructed by traditional PCA are generally unacceptable. In this paper, a work flow is proposed to integrate cumulative distribution-function (CDF) mapping with PCA (CDF/PCA) for assisted history matching on a two-facies channelized reservoir. The CDF/PCA is developed to reconstruct reservoir models by use of only a few hundred principal components. It inherits the advantage of PCA to capture the main features or trends of spatial correlations among properties, and more importantly, it can properly correct the smoothing effect of PCA. Integer variables such as facies indicators are regenerated by truncating their corresponding PCA results with thresholds that honor the fraction of each facies at first, and then real variables such as permeability and porosity are regenerated by mapping their corresponding PCA results to new values according to the CDF curves of different properties in different facies. Therefore, the models reconstructed by CDF/PCA preserve both geological (facies fraction) and geostatistical (non-Gaussian distribution with multipeaks) characteristics of their original or prior models. The CDF/PCA method is first applied to a real-field case with three facies to quantify the quality of the models reconstructed. Compared with the traditional PCA results, the integration of CDF-based mapping with PCA can significantly improve the quality of the reconstructed reservoir models. Results for the real-field case also reveal some limitations of the proposed CDF/PCA, especially when it is applied to reservoirs with three or more facies. Then, the CDF/PCA together with an effectively parallelized derivative- free optimization method is applied to history matching of a synthetic case with two facies. The geological facies, reservoir properties, and uncertainty characteristics of production forecasts of models reconstructed with CDF/PCA are well-consistent with those of the original models. Our results also demonstrate that the CDF/PCA is applicable for conditioning to both hard data and production data with minimal compromise of geological realism.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Abacioglu, Y., Oliver, D. S. and Reynolds, A. C. 2001. Efficient History Matching Using Subspace Vectors. Computat. Geosci. 5 (2): 151–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013155928900.
Alpak, F. O., Vink, J. C., Gao, G. et al. 2013. Techniques for Effective Simulation, Optimization, and Uncertainty Quantification of the In-Situ Upgrading Process. J. Unconven. Oil Gas Resour. 3–4 (December): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2013.09.001.
Box, G. E. P. and Muller, M. E. 1958. A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates. Ann. Math. Statist. 29 (2): 610–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177706645.
Carter, R. D., Kemp, L. F. Jr., Pierce, A. C. et al. 1974. Performance Matching With Constraints. SPE J. 14 (2): 187–196. SPE-4260-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4260-PA.
Chen, C., Jin, L., Gao, G. et al. 2012. Assisted History Matching Using Three Derivative-free Optimization Algorithms. Presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4–7 June. SPE-154112-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/154112-MS.
Coats, K. H., Dempsey, J. R. and Henderson, J. H. 1970. A New Technique for Determining Reservoir Description from Field Performance Data. SPE J. 10 (1): 66–74. SPE-2344-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2344-PA.
Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G. 1997. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide, second edition. New York City: Oxford University Press.
Gao, G. 2005. Data Integration and Uncertainty Evaluation for Large Scale Automatic History Matching Problems. PhD dissertation, University of Tulsa, Tulsa.
Gao, G., Vink, J. C., Alpak, F. O. et al. 2015. An Efficient Optimization Workflow for Field-Scale In-Situ Upgrading Developments. SPE J. 20 (4): 701–716. SPE-2014-1885283-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2014-1885283.
Gavalas, G. R., Shah, P. C. and Seinfeld, J. H. 1976. Reservoir History Matching by Bayesian Estimation. SPE J. 16 (6): 337–350. SPE-5740-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5740-PA.
Kelkar, M. and Perez, G. 2002. Applied Geostatistics for Reservoir Characterization. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Khaninezhad, M. M., Jafarpour, B. and Li, L. 2012a. Sparse Geologic Dictionaries for Subsurface Flow Model Calibration: Part I. Inversion Formulation. Adv. Water Resour. 39 (April): 106–121.
Khaninezhad, M. M., Jafarpour, B. and Li, L. 2012b. Sparse Geologic Dictionaries for Subsurface Flow Model Calibration: Part II. Robustness to Uncertainty. Adv. Water Resour. 39 (April): 122–136.
Kolenikov, S. and Angeles, G. 2009. Socioeconomic Status Measurement with Discrete Proxy Variables: Is Principal Component Analysis a Reliable Answer? Rev. Income Wealth 55 (1): 128–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00309.x.
Leguijt, J. 2012. Using Two-Point Geostatistics Reservoir Model Parameters Reduction. Proc., ECMOR XIII – 13th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Biarritz, France, 10–13 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20143173.
Mohamed, L., Christie, M., Demyanov, V. et al. 2010. Application of Particle Swarms For History Matching in the Brugge Reservoir. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135264-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/135264-MS.
Oliver, D. S. 1996. Multiple Realizations of the Permeability Field From Well Test Data. SPE J. 1 (2): 145–154. SPE-27970-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/27970-PA.
Oliver, D. S., Reynolds, A. C. and Liu, N. 2008. Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching. New York City: Cambridge University Press.
Reynolds, A. C., He, N., Chu, L. et al. 1996. Reparameterization Techniques for Generating Reservoir Descriptions Conditioned to Variograms and Well-Test Pressure Data. SPE J. 1 (4): 413–426. SPE-30588-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30588-PA.
Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L. J. and Aziz, K. 2008. Kernel Principal Component Analysis for Efficient, Differentiable Parameterization of Multipoint Geostatistics. Math. Geosci. 40 (1): 3–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-007-9131-7.
Scheevel, J. R. and Payrazyan, K. 2001. Principal Component Analysis Applied to 3D Seismic Data for Reservoir Property Estimation. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4 (1): 64–72. SPE-69739-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/69739-PA.
Strebelle, S. B. and Journel, A. G. 2001. Reservoir Modeling Using Multiple-Point Statistics. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–3 October. SPE-71324-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71324-MS.
Yadav, S. 2006. History Matching Using Face-Recognition Technique Based on Principal Component Analysis. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–27 September. SPE-102148-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102148-MS.
Zhao, Y., Reynolds, A. C. and Li, G. 2008. Generating Facies Maps by Assimilating Production Data and Seismic Data with the Ensemble Kalman Filter. Presented at the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 20–23 April. SPE-113990-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/113990-MS.
Zhou, H., Gómez-Hernández, J. J., Franssen, H. H. et al. 2011. An Approach to Handling Non-gaussianity of Parameters and State Variables in Ensemble Kalman Filtering. Adv. Water Resour. 34 (7): 844–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.04.014.
Zhou, H., Li, L., Franssen, H. H. et al. 2012a. Pattern Recognition in a Bimodal Aquifer Using the Normal-score Ensemble Kalman Filter. Math. Geosci. 44 (2): 169–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9372-3.
Zhou, H., Li, L. and Gómez-Hernández, J. J. 2012b. Characterizing Curvilinear Features Using the Localized Normal-score Ensemble Kalman Filter. Abstract Appl. Anal. 2012: 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/805707.