Tight-Gas-Sand Permeability Estimation From Nuclear-Magnetic-Resonance (NMR) Logs Based on the Hydraulic-Flow-Unit (HFU) Approach
- Liang Xiao (School of Geophysics and Information Technology) | Xiao-peng Liu (Geological Exploration and Development Research Institute in Sichuan-Changqing Drilling and Exploration Engineering Corporation) | Zhi-qiang Mao (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting) | Chang-chun Zou (School of Geophysics and Information Technology) | Xiao-xin Hu (Geological Exploration and Development Research Institute in Sichuan-Changqing Drilling and Exploration Engineering Corporation, CNPC,) | Yan Jin (Southwest Oil and Gas Field Branch Company, PetroChina)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- July 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 306 - 314
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 640 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The crossplot of porosity vs. Klinkenberg permeability (PERM) for 378 core samples, drilled from tight gas sands in the Xujiahe formation of the Anlu region-central Sichuan basin, southwest China, showed that tight-gas-sand permeability cannot be estimated effectively from porosity directly because only a poor relationship can be found between core-derived porosity and permeability because of the strong heterogeneity, especially for reservoirs with dominant microfractures (with porosities lower than 6.5%). However, the problem can be solved by introducing the HFU approach. In this paper, the 378 core samples were divided into five types on the basis of the difference of the flow-zone indicator (FZI), and then relationships of rock porosity and permeability were established for every type of core sample. By virtue of the analysis of the expression of FZI and the classical Schlumberger Doll Research (SDR) Center model, a novel technique used to obtain FZI from NMR logs was proposed and a corresponding model was established. The model parameters were calibrated by use of the laboratory NMR measurements of 54 plug samples taken from the Xujiahe formation. Carried out on the experimental data sets, this procedure can be extended to reservoir conditions to estimate consecutive formation permeability along the intervals through which NMR logs were acquired. The processing results of field examples illustrate that the calculated FZI values from field NMR logs match very well with the core analyzed results; the absolute errors among them are within the scope of 60.15. Moreover, permeability, estimated by use of the proposed technique and the core analyzed results are consistent. However, the calibrated SDR model is exclusive to the cases where formation permeability ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 md. To improve permeability prediction with the SDR model, many more core samples drilled from formations with dominant microfractures needed to be tested for laboratory NMR experiments to calibrate the SDR model for each HFU.
|File Size||938 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Abbaszadeh, M., Fujii, H., and Fujimoto, F. 1996. PermeabilityPrediction by Hydraulic Flow Units - Theory and Applications. SPE FormEval 11 (4): 263-271. SPE-30158-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30158-PA.
Al-Ajmi, F.A. and Holditch, S.A. 2000. Permeability Estimation UsingHydraulic Flow Units in a Central Arabia Reservoir. Presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October. SPE-63254-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/63254-MS.
Altunbay, M., Georgi, D., and Takezaki, H.M. 1997. PermeabilityPrediction for Carbonates: Still a Challenge? Presented at the Middle East OilShow and Conference, Bahrain, 15-18 March. SPE-37753-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37753-MS.
Amaefule, J.O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D. et al. 1993. Enhanced ReservoirDescription: Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units andPredict Permeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells. Presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. SPE-26436-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/26436-MS.
Babadagli, T. and Al-Salmi, S. 2002. Improvement of Permeability Predictionfor Carbonate Reservoirs Using Well Log Data. Presented at the SPE Asia PacificOil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, Australia, 8-10 October.SPE-77889-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/77889-MS.
Biniwale, S. and Behrenbruch, P. 2004. The Mapping of Hydraulic Flow ZoneUnits and Characterisation of Australian Geological Depositional Environments.Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth,Australia, 18-20 October. SPE-88521-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88521-MS.
Bust, V.K., Oletu, J.U., and Worthington, P.F. 2011. The Challengesfor Carbonate Petrophysics in Petroleum Resource Estimation. SPE Res Eval& Eng 14 (1): 25-34. SPE-142819-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/142819-PA.
Carman, P.C. 1937. Fluid flow through granular beds. Transactions of theInstitution of Chemical Engineers 15 (1937): 150-166.
Coates, G.R., Xiao, L., and Prammer, M.G. 2000. NMR Logging Principlesand Applications, 45-132. Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.
Dunn, K.-J., Bergman, D.J., and Latorraca, G.A. ed. 2002. Nuclearmagnetic resonance petrophysical and logging applications, 15-132, Vol. 32.New York: Handbook of Geophysical Exploration: Seismic Exploration, PergamonPress.
D'Windt, A. 2007. Reservoir Zonation And Permeability Estimation:A BayesianApproach. Presented at the SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium, Austin, Texas,3-6 June. Paper No. 2007_UUU.
Gao, J.B., Sun, L.T., and Wang, Z.R. 1991. Development of a transientpulse permeameter for tight rocks (in Chinese). Chinese Journal ofScientific Instrument 12 (4): 365-371.
Haghighi, M.B.P., Shabaninejad, M., and Afsari, K. 2011. APermeability Predictive Model Based On Hydraulic Flow Unit for One of IranianCarbonate Tight Gas Reservoir. Presented at the SPE Middle East UnconventionalGas Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Oman, 31 January-2 February.SPE-142183-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/142183-MS.
Hearn, C.L., Ebanks Jr., W.J., Tye, R.S. et al. 1984. Geological FactorsInfluencing Reservoir Performance of the Hartzog Draw Field, Wyoming. J PetTechnol 36 (8): 1335-1344. SPE-12016-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12016-PA.
Jennings, J.W. Jr. and Lucia, F.J. 2003. Predicting Permeability From WellLogs in Carbonates With a Link to Geology for Interwell Permeability Mapping.SPE Res Eval & Eng 6 (4): 215-225. SPE-84942-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84942-PA.
Jiao, C.H. and Xu, Z.H. 2006. An approach to permeability prediction basedon flow zone index (in Chinese). Well Logging Technology 30(4): 317-319.
Kenyon, W. 1997. Petrophysical Principles of Applications of NMR Logging.The Log Analyst 38 (2): 21-43.
Kenyon, W.E., Day, P.I., Straley, C. et al. 1988. A Three-Part Study of NMRLongitudinal Relaxation Properties of Water-Saturated Sandstones. SPE FormEval 3 (3): 622-636. SPE-15643-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15643-PA.
Kozeny, J. 1927. Uber Kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden.Sitzungsberichte. Akad. Wiss. Wien 136: 271-306.
Mao, Z.-Q., Xiao, L., Wang, Z.-N. et al. 2013. Estimation of Permeability byIntegrating Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Logs with Mercury InjectionCapillary Pressure (MICP) Data in Tight Gas Sands. Appl. Magn. Reson. 44 (4): 449-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00723-012-0384-z.
Nelson, P.H. 1994. Permeability-Porosity Relationships in Sedimentary Rocks.The Log Analyst 35 (3): 38-62. SPWLA-1994-v35n3a4.
Nooruddin, H.A. and Hossain, M.E. 2011. Modified Kozeny-Carmen correlationfor enhanced hydraulic flow unit characterization. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 80 (1): 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.11.003.
Rahmawan, I., Firmanto, T., Priyantoro, J. et al. 2009. EstimatingPermeability in Un-cored Wells Using Modified Flow Zone Index. Presented at theAsia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference & Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 4-6August. SPE-122490-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/122490-MS.
Richard, S. 2002. Coates and SDR permeability: Two variations on the sametheme. Petrophysics, 43(1): 38-46.
Svirsky, D., Ryazanov, A., Pankov, M. et al. 2004. Hydraulic Flow UnitsResolve Reservoir Description Challenges in a Siberian Oil Field. Presented atthe SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management,Kuala Lumpur, 29-30 March. SPE-87056-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/87056-MS.
Tiab, D. and Donaldson, E.C. 2012. Petrophysics: Theory and Practices ofMeasuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties, third edition,85-219. Oxford, UK: Gulf Professional Publishing.
Tiab, D., Marschall, D.M., and Altunbay, M.H. 1993. Method foridentifying and characterizing hydraulic units of saturated porous media:tri-kappa zoning process. US Patent No. 5,193,059.
Xiao, L., Mao, Z.-Q., Wang, Z.-N. et al. 2012a. Application of NMR logs intight gas reservoirs for formation evaluation: A case study of Sichuan basin inChina. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 81 (2012): 182-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.12.025.
Xiao, L., Mao, Z.-Q., Li, G.-R. et al. 2012b. Calculation of porosity fromnuclear magnetic resonance and conventional logs in gas-bearing reservoirs.Acta Geophys. 60 (4): 1030-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0015-y.
Yang, M.S. 2001. Study of Optimal Work Condition About Instantaneous-PulsePermeability Test Equipment (in Chinese). Journal of Southwest PetroleumInstitute 23 (1): 46-48.
Yang, M.S., Liu, T., and Liu, S.Z. 2001. Study on MeasuringPetrophysical Properties of Low Permeability Reservoir (in Chinese). SpecialOil and Gas Reservoirs 10 (4): 85-86.