Straightline Analysis of Flow Rate vs. Cumulative-Production Data for the Explicit Determination of Gas Reserves
- Peng Ye (Pennsylvania State University) | Luis Ayala (Pennsylvania State University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- July 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 296 - 305
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.6.9 Production Forecasting, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 783 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Production forecasting and prediction of original fluids in place are important gas-well-performance evaluations which are routinely conducted using rate/time decline-curve analysis. Currently, rate/time decline-curve analysis of natural-gas reservoirs relies heavily on the use of empirical curve fitting of boundary-dominated rate/time production data using type curves or the Arps hyperbolic decline model. In this study, we show that original fluids-in-place prediction and gas-well-performance evaluations can be conducted simply by straightline analysis of boundary-dominated data in flow-rate vs. cumulative-production plots. We first analytically demonstrate that the hyperbolic decline exponent describing the depletion of single-phase volumetric gas reservoirs is not subject to empirical determination from rate/time data. Decline behaviour of gas wells producing at less than full potential is also shown to exhibit a hybrid decline character: hyperbolic during early boundary-dominated flow and exponential at later times. In both cases, explicit calculations of hyperbolic decline coefficients are possible, thus enabling the explicit calculation of gas reserves using flow-rate vs. cumulative-production straightline plots. Numerical and field case studies are presented to demonstrate the applicability and generality of the proposed reserves determination methodology.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Ahmed, T. and McKinney, P.D. 2005. Unconventional Gas. In AdvancedReservoir Engineering, Chap. 3. Oxford, UK: Gulf ProfessionalPublishing/Elsevier.
Abou-Kassem, J.H., Mattar, L., and Dranchuk, P.M. 1990. ComputerCalculations Of Compressibility Of Natural Gas. J Can Pet Technol 29 (5). PETSOC-90-05-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/90-05-10.
Arps, J.J. 1945. Analysis of Decline Curves. In Petroleum Development andTechnology 1945, Vol. 160, SPE-945228-G, 228-247. New York: Transactions ofthe American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, AIME.
Ayala, L. and Ye, P. 2013. Unified Decline Type-Curve Analysis for NaturalGas Wells in Boundary-Dominated Flow. SPE J. 18 (1):97-113. SPE-161095-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/161095-PA.
Blasingame, T.A. and Lee, W.J. 1988. The Variable-Rate Reservoir LimitsTesting of Gas Wells. Presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Dallas,13-15 June. SPE-17708-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17708-MS.
Carter, R.D. 1985. Type Curves for Finite Radial and Linear Gas-FlowSystems: Constant-Terminal-Pressure Case. Society of Petroleum EngineersJournal 25 (5): 719-728. SPE-12917-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12917-PA.
CMG. 2012. IMEX User Manual, MYR2012 Version. Calgary, Alberta: ComputerModelling Group.
Dranchuk, P.M. and Abou-Kassem, J. H. 1975. Calculation of Z FactorsFor Natural Gases Using Equations of State. J Can Pet Technol 14 (3). PETSOC-75-03-03. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/75-03-03.
Fetkovich, M.J. 1980. Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves. J PetTechnol 32 (6): 1065-1077. SPE 4629-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4629-PA.
Fetkovich, M.J., Vienot, M.E., Bradley, M.D. et al. 1987. Decline CurveAnalysis Using Type Curves: Case Histories. SPE Form Eval 2(4): 637-656. SPE-13169-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13169-PA.
Fraim, M.L. and Wattenbarger, R.A. 1987. Gas Reservoir Decline CurveAnalysis Using Type Curves with Real Gas Pseudopressure and Normalized Time.SPE Form Eval 2 (4): 671-682. SPE-14238-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14238-PA.
Ibrahim, M., Wattenbarger, R.A., and Helmy, W. 2003. Determination ofOGIP for Wells in Pseudosteady-State-Old Techniques, New Approaches. Presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October.SPE-84286-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84286-MS.
Ibrahim, M., and Wattenbarger, R.A., 2005, Analysis of Rate Dependence inTransient Linear Flow in Tight Gas wells, Petroleum Society's 6thCanadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada June7-9.
Ilk, D., Rushing, J.A., and Blasingame, T.A. 2009. Decline CurveAnalysis for HP/HT Gas Wells: Theory and Applications. Presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October.SPE-125031-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/125031-MS.
Lee, A.L., Gonzalez, M.H., and Eakin, B.E. 1966. The Viscosity ofNatural Gases. J Pet Technol 18 (8): 997-1000. SPE-1340-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1340-PA.
Mattar, L. and Anderson, D. 2005. Dynamic Material Balance (Oil orGas-In-Place Without Shut-Ins). Presented at the Canadian InternationalPetroleum Conference, Calgary, 7-9 June. CIPC 2005-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/2005-113.
Mattar, L. and Anderson, D.M. 2003. A Systematic and ComprehensiveMethodology for Advanced Analysis of Production Data. Presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. SPE-84472-MS.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84472-MS.
Palacio, J.C. and Blasingame, T.A. 1993. Decline-Curve Analysis Using TypeCurves—Analysis of Gas Well Production Data. Oral presentation Presented at theRocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition,Denver, 26-28 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25909-MS.
Sutton, R.P. 1985. Compressibility Factors for High-Molecular-WeightReservoir Gases. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 22-26 September. SPE-14265-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14265-MS.
Ye, P. and Ayala H, L.F. 2012. A density-diffusivity approach for theunsteady state analysis of natural gas reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 7: 22-34. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2012.03.004.