Use of Model-Predictive Control for Automating SAGD Well-Pair Operations: A Simulation Study
- Kalpesh Patel (Statoil Canada Ltd.) | Elvira M. Aske (Statoil ASA) | Morten Fredriksen (Statoil ASA)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2014
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 105 - 113
- 2014.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
- subcool control, in situ recovery, model predictive control, SAGD, advanced process control
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 428 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
For more than a decade, the steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) process has been in use commercially to extract heavy oil from Athabasca oil-sand deposits a few hundred meters below the surface. Operating challenges in the SAGD phase of operations arise not only because the process is hidden below the surface, but also because of the number of well pairs needed to drain the reserves and the number of variables that need to be considered for each well pair. Different control philosophies have been suggested and used to control SAGD well pairs, which focus on a single variable or a few out of the many variables to be considered. None of these philosophies have been found to consider the well pair as a whole, with interactions between the downhole variables, and none of the philosophies have been found to include predictive capability. In this paper, we demonstrate, for the first time, how model-predictive control (MPC) can be used to control, stabilize, and assist optimization of a SAGD well pair. This paper shows how we used proprietary MPC software to control and stabilize a typical configuration of a numerically simulated virtual SAGD well pair. Our simulation results demonstrate that MPC is suitable for use in SAGD industry and provides insights into the use of MPC to manage actual SAGD operation.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Butler, R.M. 1997. Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen. Calgary: GravDrain Inc.
Clark, H.P., Ascanio, F.A., Van Kruijsdijk, C. et al. 2010. Method to Improve Thermal EOR Performance Using Intelligent Well Technology: Orion SAGD Field Trial. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 19-21 October. SPE-137133-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/137133-MS.
CMG. 2011. STARS User Manual, Version 2011.10. Calgary, Alberta: Computer Modelling Group.
Edmunds, N.R. 1998. Investigation of SAGD Steam Trap Control in Two and Three Dimensions. Presented at the SPE International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, 1–4 November. SPE-50413-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/50413-MS.
Gates, I.D. and Leskiw, C. 2010. Impact of steam trap control on performance of steam-assisted gravity drainage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 75 (1–2): 215–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.11.014.
Gotawala, D.R. and Gates, I.D. 2009. SAGD Subcool Control with Smart Injection Wells. Presented at the EUROPE/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 8–11 June. SPE-122014-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/122014-MS.
Gotawala, D.R. and Gates, I.D. 2012. A Basis for Automated Control of Steam Trap Subcool in SAGD. SPE J. 17 (3): 680–686. SPE-159170-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/159170-PA.
van der Linden, R. and Leemhuis, A. 2010. The Use of Model Predictive Control for Asset Production Optimization: Application to a Thin-Rim Oil Field Case. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-134308-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/134308-MS.
Li,P., Chan, M., Froehlich, W. 2009. Steam Injection Pressure and the SAGD Ramp-Up Process. J Can Pet Technol 48 (1): 36–41. PETSOC-09-01-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/09-01-36.
Qin, S.J. and Badgwell, T.A. 2003. A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice 11 (7): 733–764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00186-7.
Le Ravalec, M., Morlot, C., Marmier, R. and Foulon, D. 2009. Heterogeneity Impact of SAGD Process Performance in Mobile Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Rev. IFP 64 (4): 469–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2009014.
Richalet, J., Rault, A., Testud, J.L. and Papon, J. 1978. Model predictive heuristic control: Applications to industrial processes. Automatica 14 (5): 413–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90001-8.
Saputelli, L., Nikolaou, M., and Economides M.J. 2005. Self-Learning Reservoir Management. SPE Res Eval & Eng 8 (6): 534–547. SPE-84064-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84064-PA.
Sharma, J. and Gates, I.D. 2011. Convection at the Edge of a Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Steam Chamber. SPE J. 16 (3): 503–512. SPE-142432-PA http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/142432-PA.
Strand, S. and Sagli, J.R. 2004. MPC in STATOIL – Advantages With In-House Technology. In 7th International Symposium, Advanced control of chemical processes: 97–104. http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/prost/proceedings/adchem03/contents/paperpdf/semiplen/811.pdf.