A Two-Level Strategy to Realize Life-Cycle Production Optimization in an Operational Setting
- Gijs van Essen (Delft University of Technology) | Paul Van den Hof (Eindhoven University of Technology) | Jan-Dirk Jansen (Delft University of Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- July 2013
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,057 - 1,066
- 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.3.4 Real-time Optimization, 3.2 Well Operations, Optimization and Stimulation
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 260 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
We present a two-level strategy to improve robustness against uncertainty and model errors in life-cycle flooding optimization. At the upper level, a physics-based large-scale reservoir model is used to determine optimal life-cycle injection and production profiles. At the lower level, these profiles are considered as set points (reference values) for a tracking control algorithm, also known as a model predictive controller (MPC), to optimize the production variables over a short moving horizon on the basis of a simple data-driven model. In the process industry such a two-level approach is a well-known strategy to correct for small local disturbances that may have a negative (cumulative) effect on the long-term production strategy. We used a conventional reservoir simulator with gradient-based optimization functionality to perform the life-cycle optimization. Next, we applied this long-term strategy to a reservoir model, representing the truth, with somewhat different geological characteristics and near-wellbore characteristics not captured inthe reservoir model used for the long term optimization. We compared the performance (oil recovery) of this truth model when applying the life-cycle strategy with and without the corrections provided by the data-driven algorithm and the tracking controller. In this theoretical study we observed that the useof the lower-level controller enabled successful tracking of the reference values provided by the upper-level optimizer. In our example, a performance drop of 6.4% in net present value (NPV), caused by differences between the reservoir model used for life-cycle optimization and the true reservoir, was successfully reduced to only 0.5% when applying the two-level strategy. Several studies have demonstrated that model-based life-cycle production optimization has a large scope to improve long-term economic performance of waterflooding projects. However, because of uncertainties in geology, economics, and operational decisions, such life-cycle strategies cannot simply be applied in reality. Our two-level approach offers a potential solution to realize life-cycle optimization in an operational setting.
|File Size||785 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Alhuthali, A.H., Oyerinde, D. and Datta-Gupta, A. 2007. Optimal WaterfloodManagement Using Rate Control. SPE Res Eval & Eng 10(5) 539-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102478-PA.
Almeida, L.F., Tupac, Y.J., Lazo Lazo, J.G., et al. 2007. EvolutionaryOptimization of Smart-Wells Control Under Technical Uncertainties. Paper SPE107872 presented at the Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum EngineeringConference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15-18 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/107872-MS.
Asheim, H. 1988. Maximization of Water Sweep Efficiency by ControllingProduction and Injection Rates. Paper SPE 18365 presented at the SPE EuropeanPetroleum Conference, London, United Kingdom, 16-18 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18365-MS.
Brouwer, D.R. and Jansen, J.D. 2004. Dynamic Optimization of Water Floodingwith Smart Wells Using Optimal Control Theory. SPE J. 9 (4):391-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/78278-PA.
Chen, C., Li, G. and Reynolds, A.C. 2012. Robust Constrained Optimization ofShort- and Long-Term Net Present Value for Closed-Loop Reservoir Management.SPE J. 17 (3): 849-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/141314-PA.
Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S. and Zhang, D. 2009. Efficient Ensemble-BasedClosed-Loop Production Optimization. SPE J. 14 (4):634-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/112873-PA.
Chierici, G.L., Gottardi, G.A. and Guidorzi, R.P. 1981. Identified Modelsfor Gas Storage Dynamics. SPE J. 21 (2) 151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/8862-PA.
Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Mukerji, T. and Durlofsky, L.J. 2011.Derivative-Free Optimization for Oil Field Operations. In: ComputationalOptimization and Applications in Engineering and Industry, eds. X. S. Yangand S. Koziel, 19-55. Studies in Computational Intelligence Series,Springer-Verlag.
Foss, B. and Jensen, J.P. 2010. Performance Analysis for Closed-LoopReservoir Management. SPE J. 16 (1) 183-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/138891-PA.
Friedland, B. 1986. Control System Design: An Introduction to State SpaceMethods. New York City, New York: McGraw Hill.
Heijn, T., Markovinovic, R. and Jansen, J.D. 2004. Generation of Low-OrderReservoir Models Using System-Theoretical Concepts. SPE J. 9 (2): 202-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88361-PA.
Jansen, J.D., Douma, S.G., Brouwer, D.R., et al. 2009. Closed-Loop ReservoirManagement. Paper SPE 119098 presented at the SPE Reservoir SimulationSymposium, The Woodlands, Texas, 2-4 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119098-MS.
Jansen, J.D. 2011. Adjoint-Based Optimization of Multiphase Flow ThroughPorous Media - A Review. Comput. Fluids 46 (1): 40-51.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.09.039.
Kraaijevanger, J.F.B.M., Egberts, P.J.P., Valstar, J.R., et al. 2007.Optimal Water Flood Design Using the Adjoint Method. Paper SPE 105764 presentedat the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 26-28 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/105764-MS.
Liu, F., Mendel, J.M. and Nejad, A.M. 2009. Forecasting Injector/ProducerRelationships from Production and Injection Rates Using an Extended KalmanFilter. SPE J. 14 (4): 653-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110520-PA.
Ljung, L. 1999. System Identification - Theory for the User, secondedition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Markovinovic, R., Geurtsen, E.L. and Jansen, J.D. 2002. SubspaceIdentification of Low-Order Reservoir Models. Proc. XIV InternationalConference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Delft, the Netherlands,23-28 June, 281-288.
Naevdal, G., Brouwer, D.R. and Jansen, J.D. 2006. Water Flooding UsingClosed-Loop Control. Computat. Geosci. 10 (1): 37-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9010-6.
Rowan, G. and Clegg, M.W. 1963. The Cybernetic Approach to ReservoirEngineering. Paper SPE 727 presented at the 38th Annual Fall Meeting of the SPEof AIME, New Orleans, Louisiana, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/727-MS.
Saputelli, L., Nikolaou, M. and Economides, M.J. 2006. Real-Time ReservoirManagement: A Multi-Scale Adaptive Optimization and Control Approach.Computat. Geosci. 10 (1): 61-96.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9011-5.
Sarma, P., Aziz, K. and Durlofsky, L.J. 2005. Implementation of AdjointSolution for Optimal Control of Smart Wells. Paper SPE 92864 presented at theSPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, 31 January-2 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/92864-MS.
Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L.J. and Aziz, K. 2008. Computational Techniques forClosed-Loop Reservoir Modeling with Application to a Realistic Reservoir.Pet. Sci. Tech. 26 (10-11):1120-1140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10916460701829580.
Sayarpour, M., Zuluaga, E., Kabir, C.S., et al. 2009. The Use ofCapacitance-Resistance Models for Rapid Estimation of Waterflood Performanceand Optimization. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 69 (3-4): 227-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.09.006.
Su, H-J. and Oliver, D.S. 2010. Smart-Well Production Optimization Using anEnsemble-Based Method. SPE Res Eval & Eng 13 (6):884-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/126072-PA.
Sudaryanto, B., and Yortsos, Y.C. 2000. Optimization of Fluid Front Dynamicsin Porous Media Using Rate Control: I. Equal Fluids. Phys. Fluids 12 (7): 1656-1670. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/13828.
Van Essen, G.M., Zandvliet, M.J., Van den Hof, P.M.J., et al. 2009. RobustWater Flooding Optimization of Multiple Geological Scenarios. SPE J. 14 (1): 202-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102913-PA.
Van Essen, G.M., Van den Hof, P.M.J. and Jansen, J.D. 2011. HierarchicalLong-Term and Short-Term Production Optimization. SPE J. 16(1): 191-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124332-PA.
Van Overschee, P. and De Moor, B. 1996. Subspace Identification forLinear Systems: Theory, Implementation, Applications. Norwell,Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Viberg, M. 1995. Subspace-Based Methods for the Identification of LinearTime-Invariant Systems. Automatica 31 (12): 1835-1851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(95)00107-5.
Wang, C., Li, G. and Reynolds, A.C., 2009: Production Optimization inClosed-Loop Reservoir Management. SPE J. 14 (3): 506-523.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/109805-PA.