Computation of Productivity Index With Capillary Pressure Included and Its Application in Interpreting Production Data From Low-Permeability Oil Reservoirs
- Kewen Li (China University of Geosciences) | Zengwei Chen (Peking University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- December 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,041 - 1,046
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.1 Waterflooding
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 435 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Capillary pressure might be ignored in high-permeability rocks, but it cannot be neglected in low-permeability rocks. To study the effect of capillary pressure on production performance in low-permeability oil wells or reservoirs, the formulas for calculating water cut and dimensionless total and oil productivity indices (PIs) were derived by considering capillary pressure. PI and water-cut data were computed using the new models with capillary pressure included. The results proved that PI increases with water cut in high-permeability rocks but decreases with the increase in water cut within a specific range in low-permeability rocks. Waterflooding experiments were then conducted in core samples with low and high permeabilities. The experimental waterflooding data demonstrated the same relationship between PI and water cut that was proved in the new PI model. Finally, the PI data were calculated using production data from oil wells, and the results were compared with the experimental data of the PI determined from coreflooding tests. The curves of PI vs. water cut, obtained from the production data of oil producers, were consistent with those inferred from waterflooding data in core samples. Note that the core plugs were sampled from the same oil wells. The new PI model was used to explain the difference in production performance between high- and low-permeability oil wells..
|File Size||902 KB||Number of Pages||6|
Aulisa, E., Ibragimov, A., and Walton, J. 2009. A New Methodfor Evaluating the Productivity Index of Nonlinear Flows. SPE J. 14 (4): 693-706. SPE-108984-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/108984-PA.
Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T. 1966. Properties of porous mediaaffecting fluid flow. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 92 (IR2):61-68.
Cho, H. and Shah, S.N. 2001. Prediction of SpecificProductivity Index for Long Horizontal Wells. Paper SPE 67237 presented at theSPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 24-27March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/67237-MS.
Corey, A.T. 1954. The interrelation between gas and oilrelative permeabilities. Producers Monthly 19 (November):38-41.
Crafton, J.W. 1997. Oil and Gas Well Evaluation Using theReciprocal Productivity Index Method. Paper SPE 37409 presented at the SPEProduction Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 9-11 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/37409-MS.
Dake, L.P. 1978. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering,No. 8. Amsterdam: Developments in Petroleum Science, Elsevier Science BV.
Dietz, D.N. 1965. Determination of Average Reservoir PressureFrom Build-Up Surveys. J Pet Technol 17 (8): 955-959.SPE-1156-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1156-PA.
Escobar, F.H., Saavedra, N.F., Aranda, R.F. et al. 2004. AnImproved Correlation to Estimate Productivity Index in Horizontal Wells. PaperSPE 88540 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference andExhibition, Perth, Australia, 18-20 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88540-MS.
Haider, M.L. 1937. Productivity Index. In Transactions ofthe American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers: PetroleumDevelopment and Technology 1937, Vol. 123, 112-119. New York: AIME.
Ibragimov, A., Khalmanova, D., Valko, P.P. et al. 2004.Analytical Method of Evaluating Productivity Index for Constant Production Rateor Constant Wellbore Pressure. Paper SPE 89935 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/89935-MS.
Johnston, N. and Sherborne, J.E. 1943. Permeability As RelatedTo Productivity Index. API Drilling & Production Practice (1943):66-80. API-43-066.
Larsen, L. 2001. General Productivity Models for Wells inHomogeneous and Layered Reservoirs. Paper SPE 71613 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/71613-MS.
Lee, S.H. and Milliken, W.J. 1993. The Productivity Index of anInclined Well in Finite-Difference Reservoir Simulation. Paper SPE 25247presented at the SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, New Orleans, 28February-3 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25247-MS.
Muskat, M. 1937. The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids ThroughPorous Media. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Purcell, W.R. 1956. Capillary Pressures--Their MeasurementUsing Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability Therefrom. In Transactionsof the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers: PetroleumDevelopment and Technology 1949, reprint edition, Vol. 186, 39-48. Dallas,Texas: Petroleum Branch/AIME.
Raghavan, R. 1993. Well Test Analysis. Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ramírez-Garnica, M., Cazarez-Candia, O., Clavel-López, J. etal. 2006. Impact of the Viscosity Reduction on the Productivity Index Using aSimulation Study in Two Networks in the Gulf of Mexico. Paper SPE 103646presented at the First International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico,Cancun, Mexico, 31 August-2 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103646-MS.
Valkó, P.P., Doublet, L.E., and Blasingame, T.A. 2000.Development and Application of the Multiwell Productivity Index (MPI). SPEJ. 5 (1): 21-31. SPE-51793-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/51793-PA.