Residual Oil Saturation Determination for EOR Projects in Means Field, a Mature West Texas Carbonate Field
- Prabodh Pathak (ExxonMobil Production Company) | Dale Fitz (ExxonMobil Exploration Company) | Kenneth Babcock (ExxonMobil Production Company) | Richard J. Wachtman (ExxonMobil Production Company)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- October 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 541 - 553
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.6.5 Tracers, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 5.6.2 Core Analysis, 5.5.2 Core Analysis
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 1,250 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The technical success of an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project depends on two main factors: first, the reservoir remaining oil saturation (ROS) after primary and secondary operations, and second, the recovery efficiency of the EOR process in mobilizing the ROS. These two interrelated parameters must be estimated before embarking on a time-consuming and costly process for designing and implementing an EOR process. The oil saturation can vary areally and vertically within the reservoir, and the distribution of the ROS will determine the success of the EOR injectants in mobilizing the remaining oil. There are many methods for determining the oil saturation (Chang et al. 1988; Pathak et al. 1989), and these include core analysis, well-log analysis, log/inject/log (LIL) procedures (Richardson et al. 1973; Reedy 1984), and single-well chemical tracer tests (SWCTT) (Deans and Carlisle 1986). These methods have different depths of investigation and different accuracies, and they all provide valuable information about the distribution of ROS. No single method achieves the best estimate of ROS, and a combination of all these methods is essential in developing a holistic picture of oil saturation and in assessing whether the oil in place (OIP) is large enough to justify the application of an EOR process. As Teletzke et al. (2010) have shown, EOR implementation is a complex process, and a staged, disciplined approach to identifying the key uncertainties and acquiring data for alleviating the uncertainties is essential. The largest uncertainty in some cases is the ROS in the reservoir. This paper presents the results from a fieldwide data acquisition program conducted in a west Texas carbonate reservoir to estimate ROS as part of an EOR project assessment. The Means field in west Texas has been producing for more than the past 75 years, and the producing mechanisms have included primary recovery, secondary waterflooding, and the application of a CO2 EOR process. The Means field is an excellent example of how the productive life and oil recovery can be increased by the application of new technology. The Means story is one of judicious application of appropriate EOR technology to the sustained development of a mature asset. The Means field is currently being evaluated for further expansion of the EOR process, and it was imperative to evaluate the oil saturation in the lower, previously undeveloped zones. This paper briefly outlines the production history, reservoir description, and reservoir management of the Means field, but this paper concentrates on the residual oil zone (ROZ) that underlies the main producing zone (MPZ) and describes a recent data acquisition program to evaluate the oil saturation in the ROZ. We discuss three major methods for evaluating the ROS: core analysis, LIL tests, and SWCTT tests.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
ATSM D4294, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum and PetroleumProducts by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 2010. WestConshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/D4294-10.
Barbe, J. 1971. Evaluation and Modification of the Means San AndresWaterflood. J Pet Technol 23 (12): 1421-1427. SPE-3301-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3301-PA.
Brady, T.R., and Sage, J.A. 2004. Means San Andres Unit: A Field History ofa Miscible CO2 Flood. In The 2004 CO2 Conference and EOR Carbon ManagementWorkshop, 7-10 December 2004, Midland, Texas.
Chang, M.M., Maerefat, N.L., Tomutsa, L., et al. 1988. Evaluation andComparison of Residual Oil Saturation Determination Techniques. SPE FormEval 3 (1): 251-262. SPe-14887-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14887-PA.
Deans, H.A., and Carlisle, C.T. 1986. Single Well Tracer Test in ComplexPore Systems. Paper SPE 14886 presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil RecoverySymposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 20-23 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14886-MS.
Honarpour, M.M., Nagarajan, N.R., Grijalba, A.C., et al. 2010. Rock FluidCharacterization for Miscible CO2 Injection: Residual Oil Zone, Seminole Field,Permian Basin. Paper SPE 133089 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19-22 September 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/133089-MS.
Hsu, C.-F., Morell, J.I., Falls, A.H. 1997. Field Scale CO2 FloodSimulations and Their Impact on the Performance of the Wasson Denver Unit.SPE Res Eng 12 (1): 4-11. SPE-29116-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/29116-PA.
Koperna, G.J., and Kuuskraa, V.A. 2006. Assessing Technical and EconomicRecovery of Oil Resources in Residual Oil Zones. U. S. Dept. of Energy, Officeof Fossil Energy, Office of Oil & Natural Gas. Arlington, Virginia:Advanced Resources International, Inc.
Lindsay, R.F. 1998. Meteoric Recharge, Displacement of Oil Columns and theDevelopment of Residual Oil Intervals in the Permian Basin. In The SearchContinues into the 21st Century: West Texas Geological Society Fall Symposium,October 29-30, 1998, ed. W. D. DeMis and M. K. Nells, eds. Publ. No. 98-105.Midland, Texas: West Texas Geological Society.
Lucia, F.J. 2000. San Andres and Grayburg Imbibition Reservoirs. Paper SPE59691 presented at the SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference,Midland, Texas, 21-23 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/59691-MS.
Magruder, J.B., Stiles, L.H., Yelverton, T.D. 1990. Review of the Means SanAndres Unit CO2 Tertiary Project. J Pet Technol 42 (5):638-644. SPE-17349-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17349-PA.
Melzer, L.S., Koperna, G.J., Kuuskraa, V.A. 2006. The Origin and ResourcePotential of Residual Oil Zones. Paper SPE 102964 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24-27 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102964-MS.
Park, Y.J., Deans, H.A., Tezduyar, T.E. 1991. Thermal effects on Single WellChemical Tracer Tests for Measuring Residual Oil Saturation. SPE FormEval 6 (3): 401-408. SPE-19683-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/19683-PA.
Pathak, P., Kuch, K.D., Kriel, B.G., et al. 1989. Evaluation of a ComplexSandstone Reservoir for EOR. Paper SPE 18771 presented at the SPE CaliforniaRegional Meeting, 5-7 April. Bakersfield, California. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18771-MS.
Pathak, P. 1992. Impact of Fluid Displacement Effects on Log-Inject-LogTests. SPE Form Eval 7 (2): 157-166. SPE-20590-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20590-PA.
Reedy, G.K. 1984. Accurate Residual Oil Saturation Measurement Using aModified Log-Inject-Log Procedure. Paper OOO. Transactions of the 25th AnnualLogging Symposium, 10-13 June 1984. New Orleans, Louisiana. Houston, Texas:Society of Petrophysicists & Well Log Analysts.
Richardson, J.E., Wyman, R.E., Jordan, J.R., et al. 1973. Methods forDetermining Residual Oil With Pulsed Neutron Capture Logs. J Pet Technol 25 (5): 593-606. SPE-3796-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3796-PA.
Rinehart, C.E., and Weber, H.J. 1975. Measuring Thermal Neutron AbsorptionCross Sections of Formation Water. Paper G. In Transactions of the 16th AnnualLogging Symposium, 4-7 June 1975. Houston, Texas: Society of Petrophysicists& Well Log Analysts.
Stiles, L.H., and Magruder, J.B. 1992. Reservoir Management in the Means SanAndres Unit. J Pet Technol 44 (4): 469-475. SPE-20751-PA.http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20751-PA.
Teletzke, G.F., Wattenbarger, R.C., Wilkinson, J.R. 2010. Enhanced OilRecovery Pilot Testing Best Practices. SPE Res Eng 13 (1):143-154. SPE-118055-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118055-PA.
Tomich, J.F., Dalton, R.L. Jr., Deans, H.A., et al. 1973. Single Well TracerMethod to Measure Residual Oil Saturation. J Pet Technol 25 (2):211-218. SPE-3792-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3792-PA.