Alkaline Steam Foam: Concepts and Experimental Results
- Hon Chung Lau (Shell International Exploration and Production)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- August 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 445 - 452
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation
- Steam foam, residual oil saturation reduction, mobility control
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 944 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Experimental studies have shown that the steam-foam process can be enhanced significantly by injecting a suitably formulated alkali/surfactant mixture in the aqueous phase of steam. Emulsion-screening tests, corefloods, and flow-visualization experiments using an alpha olefin sulfonate (AOS) surfactant with 16-18 carbon, Na2CO3, and a heavy Californian crude have shown that alkaline steam foam offers significant advantages over regular steam foam by combining the benefits of thermal and chemical enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) processes.
First, Na2CO3 reduces surfactant consumption by adsorption by rendering the clay surface more negatively charged. Second, by precipitating divalent ions that get ion exchanged off the clays, Na2CO3 reduces surfactant consumption by precipitation. Third, a suitably formulated alkali/surfactant system reduces the oil/water interfacial tension (IFT) sufficiently to enable the heavy oil to be emulsified into the aqueous phase in the presence of steam. This oil-in-water emulsion is less viscous than the oil alone and can be readily transported. Consequently, the residual-oil saturation (ROS) is reduced to a value less than that of steam. Fourth, this lower ROS reduces the destabilizing effect of oil on foam, resulting in stronger steam foam that provides better mobility control than regular steam foam. Therefore, it has the potential to further reduce steam gravity override. Fifth, the reduction in gravity override also reduces loss of heat to the cap rock, thereby improving steam use.
When applied to steamdrive, alkaline steam foam has the benefit of increasing foam-propagation rate, improving mobility control, improving steam use, and reducing the ROS. Potential applications of alkaline steam foam to steam soaks and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) are also discussed.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||8|
Chen, Q., Gerritsen, M.G., and Kovscek, A.R. 2010. Improving Steam-AssistedGravity Drainage Using Mobility Control Foams: Foam Assisted-SAGD (FA-SAGD).Paper SPE 129847 presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa,24-28 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/129847-MS.
Dilgren, R.E., Deemer, A.R., and Owens, K.B. 1982. The LaboratoryDevelopment and Field Testing of Steam/Noncondensible Gas Foams for MobilityControl in Heavy Oil Recovery. Paper SPE 10774 presented at the SPE CaliforniaRegional Meeting, San Francisco, California, USA, 24-26 March. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10774-MS.
Hirasaki, G.J. 1989. The Steam-Foam Process. J Pet Technol 41 (5): 449-456. SPE-19505-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/19505-PA.
Lau, H.C. 1986. Alkali-enhanced steam foam oil recovery process. US PatentNo. 4,609,044.
Lau, H.C. 1988. Trona-enhanced steam foam oil recovery process. US PatentNo. 4,727,938.
Lau, H.C. 1989. Alkali-enhanced steam foam oil recovery process. CanadianPatent No. 1,259,476.
Lau, H.C. and Borchardt, J.K. 1991. Improved Steam-Foam Formulations:Concepts and Laboratory Results. SPE Res Eng 6 (4):470-476. SPE-18783-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18783-PA.
Lau, H.C. and O'Brien, S.M. 1988a. Effects of Spreading and Non-spreadingOils on Foam Propagation through Porous Media. SPE Res Eng 3 (3): 893-896. SPE-15668-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15668-PA.
Lau, H.C. and O'Brien, S.M. 1988b. Surfactant Transport Through Porous Mediain Steam-Foam Processes. SPE Res Eng 3 (4): 1177-1185.SPE-14391-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14391-PA.
Nelson, R.C., Lawson, J.B., Thigpen, D.R., and Stegemeier, G.L. 1984.Cosurfactant-Enhanced Alkaline Flooding. Paper SPE 12672 presented at the SPEEnhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 15-18 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12672-MS.
Patzek, T.W. and Koinis, M.T. 1990. Kern River Steam-Foam Pilots. J PetTechnol 42 (4): 496-503. SPE-17380-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17380-PA.
Patzek, T.W. and Myhill, N.A. 1989. Simulation of the Bishop Steam FoamPilot. Paper SPE 18786 presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting,Bakersfield, California, USA, 5-7 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18786-MS.
Shedid, S.A. and El Abbas, A.A. 2000. Experimental Study of SurfactantAlkaline Steam Flood Through Vertical Wells. Paper SPE 62562 presented at theSPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting, Long Beach, California, USA, 19-22 June. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/62562-MS.