Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

The Challenges for Carbonate Petrophysics in Petroleum Resource Estimation

Authors
Vivian K. Bust (Gaffney, Cline & Associates) | Joshua U. Oletu (Gaffney, Cline & Associates) | Paul F. Worthington (Gaffney, Cline & Associates)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/142819-PA
Document ID
SPE-142819-PA
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Source
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Volume
14
Issue
01
Publication Date
February 2011
Document Type
Journal Paper
Pages
25 - 34
Language
English
ISSN
1094-6470
Copyright
2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Disciplines
5.6.2 Core Analysis, 5.6.5 Tracers, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.7.6 Reserves Classification, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.3.4 Scale, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
Keywords
Petroleum resources, Electroporefacies, Carbonates, Petrofacies, Integrated reservoir studies
Downloads
10 in the last 30 days
2,270 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 12.00
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 35.00

Summary

An examination of the core and log analysis of carbonate reservoirs has confirmed that identified shortcomings are rooted in disparate pore character. Many of the interpretation methods were developed for clastic rocks, which typically show an intergranular porosity, sometimes augmented by fracture porosity. In carbonate reservoirs, the primary pore system comprises interparticle porosity that coexists with a highly variable secondary system of dissolution voids and/or fractures. As a consequence, carbonate reservoirs are markedly heterogeneous from pore to reservoir scales, and this variability poses significant challenges to data acquisition, petrophysical evaluation, and reservoir description. For example, the ranges of carbonate facies and their pore character often control the distributions of net pay, porosity, and hydrocarbon saturation. Putting these matters together, conventional petrophysical practices that exclusively use reservoir zonation based on lithology/mineralogy have limited application in carbonates. Instead, recourse is made to a zonal discrimination that draws upon the distribution of microporosity and its connectivity with macroporosity and fractures. The discrimination scheme uses downhole technologies such as high-resolution imaging and magnetic resonance logs, supported by advanced core analysis. On this basis, a value-adding workflow is proposed to increase confidence in those petrophysical deliverables that are used in static volumetric estimates of petroleum Resources.

File Size  596 KBNumber of Pages   10

References

Abbaszadeh, M., Koide, N., and Murahashi, Y. 2000. Integrated Characterization and FlowModeling of a Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir in Daleel Field, Oman.SPE Res Eval & Eng  3 (2): 150-159. SPE-62514-PA. doi:10.2118/62514-PA.

Aguilera, R. 1995. Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, second edition.Tulsa: Pennwell Books.

Amabeoku, M.O., Kersey, D., Al-Harbi, A.A., Al-Belowi, A.R. and BinNasser,R.H. 2008. Successful Applicationof the Key Well Concept to Enhance Formation Evaluation. Paper IPTC 12579presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur,3-5 December. doi: 10.2523/12579-MS.

Amaefule, J.O., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D.G., and Keelan, D.K. 1993.Enhanced Reservoir Description:Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic (Flow) Units and PredictPermeability in Uncored Intervals/Wells. Paper SPE 26436 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. doi:10.2118/26436-MS.

Ara, T.S., Talabani, S., and Vaziri, H.H. 2001. In-Depth Investigation of theValidity of the Archie Equation in Carbonate Rocks. Paper SPE 67204presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City,Oklahoma, USA, 24-27 March. doi: 10.2118/67204-MS.

Archie, G.E. 1950. Introduction to petrophysics of reservoir rocks. AAPGBulletin  34 (5): 943-961.

Archie, G.E. 1952. Classification of carbonate reservoir rocks andpetrophysical considerations. AAPG Bulletin  36 (2):278-298.

Aschenbrenner, B.C. and Chillingar, G.V. 1960. Teodorovich's Method forDetermining Permeability from Pore-space Characteristics of Carbonate Rocks.AAPG Bulletin  44 (8): 1421-1424.

Bouvier, L. and Maquignon, S.M. 1991. Reconciliation of Log and LaboratoryDerived Irreducible Water Saturations in a Double Porosity Reservoir. InAdvances in Core Evaluation II: Reservoir Appraisal, ed. P.F.Worthington and D. Longeron, 275-292. Reading, UK: Gordon and Breach SciencePublishers.

Chatzis, I., Morrow, N.R., and Lim, H.T. 1983. Magnitude and Detailed Structure ofResidual Oil Saturation. SPE J.  23 (2): 311-326.SPE-10681-PA. doi: 10.2118/10681-PA.

Chilingar, G.V., Mannon, R.W., and Herman, H.R. ed. 1972. Oil and GasProduction from Carbonate Rocks. New York City: Elsevier Science.

Civan, F. 2002. Relating Permeability to Pore Connectivity using a Power-LawFlow Unit Equation. Petrophysics  43 (6): 457-476.

Corbett, P.M.W. and Jensen, J.L. 1992a. Variation of reservoir statisticsaccording to sample spacing and measurement type for some intervals in theLower Brent Group. The Log Analyst  33 (1): 22-41.

Corbett, P.M.W. and Jensen, J.L. 1992b. Estimating the mean permeability:how many measurements do you need? First Break  10 (3):89-94.

Cosentino, L. 2001. Integrated Reservoir Studies. Paris: EditionsTechnip.

Dehghan, A.A., Kharrat, R., Ghazanfari, M.H., and Farzaheh, S.A. 2009. Studying the Effects of PoreGeometry, Wettability and Co-Solvent Types on the Efficiency of SolventFlooding to Heavy Oil in Five-Spot Models. Paper SPE 123315 presented atthe Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference & Exhibition, Jakarta, 4-6 August.doi: 10.2118/123315-MS.

Dewan, J. 1983. Essentials of Modern Open-Hole Log Interpretation.Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell Publishing Company.

Focke, J.W. and Munn, D. 1987. Cementation Exponents in MiddleEastern Carbonate Reservoirs. SPE Form Eval  2 (2):155-167. SPE-13735-PA. doi: 10.2118/13735-PA.

Gomaa, N., Al-Alyak, A, Ouzzane, D., Saif, O., Okuyiga, M., Allen, D., Rose,D., Ramamoorthy, R., and Bize, E. 2006. Case Study of Permeability, VugQuantification, and Rock Typing in a Complex Carbonate. Paper SPE 102888presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,Texas, USA, 24-27 September. doi: 10.2118/102888-MS.

Gomes, J.S. 2008. CarbonateReservoir Rock Typing--The Link between Geology and SCAL. Paper SPE 118284presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference,Abu Dhabi, UAE, 3-6 November. doi: 10.2118/118284-MS.

Hassall, J.K., Ferraris, P., Al-Raisi, M., Hurley, N.F., Boyd, A., andAllen, D.F. 2004. Comparison ofPermeability Predictors from NMR, Formation Image and Other Logs in a CarbonateReservoir. Paper SPE 88683 presented at the Abu Dhabi InternationalPetroleum Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 10-13 October. doi:10.2118/88683-MS.

Hurst, A. and Rosvoll, K.J. 1991. Permeability variations in sandstones andtheir relationship to sedimentary structures. In Reservoir CharacterizationII, ed. L.W. Lake, H.B. Carroll Jr., and T. C. Wesson, 166-196. San Diego,California: Academic Press.

Jennings, J.W. Jr. and Lucia, F.J. 2003. Predicting Permeability From WellLogs in Carbonates With a Link to Geology for Interwell PermeabilityMapping. SPE Res Eval & Eng  6 (4): 215-225.SPE-84942-PA. doi: 10.2118/84942-PA.

Leverett, M.C. 1941. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. SPE-941152-G.Trans., AIME, 142: 152-169.

Lucia, F.J. 1983. PetrophysicalParameters Estimated from Visual Descriptions of Carbonate Rocks: A FieldClassification of Carbonate Pore Space. J Pet Technol 35 (3): 629-637. SPE-10073-PA. doi: 10.2118/10073-PA.

Lucia, F.J. 2007. Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: An IntegratedApproach, second edition. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

Lucia, F.J., Kerans, C., and Jennings, J.W. Jr. 2003. Carbonate reservoircharacterization. J Pet Technol  55 (6): 70-72.SPE-82071-PA. doi: 10.2118/82071-MS.

Miall, A.D. 1990. Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis, secondedition. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

Pittman, E.D. 1992. Relationship of porosity and permeability to variousparameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves forsandstone. AAPG Bulletin  76 (2): 191-198.

Ragland, D.A. 2002. Trends in Cementation Exponents (m) for Carbonate PoreSystems. Petrophysics  43 (5): 434-446.

Rider, M. 1996. The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs, secondedition. Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.

Serra, O. and Abbott, H.T. 1982. The Contribution of Logging Data toSedimentology and Stratigraphy. SPE J.  22 (1): 117-131.SPE-9270-PA. doi: 10.2118/9270-MS. 

SPE, WPC, AAPG, and SPEE. 2007. Petroleum Resources Management System, http://www.spe.org/industry/reserves/docs/Petroleum_Resources_Management_System_2007.pdf.

Thompson, K.E., Willson, C.S., White, C.D., Nyman, S., Bhattacharya, J., andReed, A.H. 2005. Application of aNew Grain-Based Reconstruction Algorithm to Microtomography Images forQuantitative Characterization and Flow Modeling. SPE J. 13 (2): 164-176. SPE-95887-PA. doi: 10.2118/95887-PA.

Truman, R.B. II and Davidson, J.A. 2003. SEC Defined Reserves Booking: Whatthe Petrophysicist Needs to Know. Paper SPE 84388 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. doi:10.2118/84388-MS.

Vavra, C.L., Kaldi, J.G., and Sneider, R.M. 1992. Geological applications ofcapillary pressure; a review. AAPG Bulletin  76 (6):840-850.

Worthington, P.F. 2002. A Validation Criterion To Optimize Core Sampling ForThe Characterization Of Petrophysical Facies. Petrophysics 43 (6): 477-493.

Worthington, P.F. 2004a. Maximizing the Effectiveness ofIntegrated Reservoir Studies: Practical Approaches to Improving the Process andResults. J Pet Technol  56 (1): 57-62. SPE-83701-MS.doi: 10.2118/83701-MS.

Worthington, P.F. 2004b. The effect of scale on the petrophysical estimationof intergranular permeability. Petrophysics  45 (1):59-72.

Worthington, P.F. 2007. A road map for improving thetechnical basis for the estimation of petroleum reserves. PetroleumGeoscience  13 (4): 291-303. doi:10.1144/1354-079306-732.

Worthington, P.F. 2008. A diagnostic approach toquantifying the stress sensitivity of permeability. J. Pet. Sci.Eng.  61 (2-4): 49-57. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2008.03.003.

Yuan, H.H. 1981. The Influenceof Pore Coordination on Petrophysical Parameters. Paper SPE 10074 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA,4-7 October. doi: 10.2118/10074-MS.

    • Issue Preprint
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
Show more

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in