Proppant Diagenesis--Integrated Analyses Provide New Insights Into Origin, Occurrence, and Implications for Proppant Performance
- Robert Duenckel (Carbo Ceramics) | Michael W. Conway (Stim-Lab Division of Core Laboratories) | B. Eldred (Carbo Ceramics) | M.C. Vincent (Consultant)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 131 - 144
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.3.3 Aspaltenes, 3 Production and Well Operations, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- shale, diagenesis, fracturing, proppant
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 926 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
In the application of hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas reservoirs, the objective is to create a conductive pathway for hydrocarbons to flow into the wellbore. This is accomplished by placing a proppant into the created fracture that will prevent fracture closure and maintain a high conductivity for an extended time period. A number of mechanisms have been identified that can degrade the fracture conductivity, including mechanical failure of the proppant grains, liberation of formation fines, proppant embedment, formation spalling, damage from the fracturing fluid, stress cycling, asphaltene deposition, proppant dissolution, and others. These factors in combination can reduce the effective conductivity by orders of magnitude as compared with the typically published conductivity data measured under reference conditions.
Another mechanism for degradation of proppant over time has recently been postulated. This mechanism has been labeled "diagenesis" and refers to a dissolution and reprecipitation process that may reduce the porosity, permeability, and strength of the proppant pack as precipitants are deposited. Factors that were believed to control the occurrence and degree of diagenesis include closure stress, reservoir temperature, proppant type, and mineralogy of the rock formation. While much work has gone into evaluating this phenomenon by the industry, there remains uncertainty as to the prevalence of this mechanism and the prediction of its occurrence.
This paper will summarize results from high-temperature static tests, extended-duration flow tests at reservoir conditions, detailed analyses of precipitates, the effects of this environment on the mechanical properties of proppants, chemical and mineralogical analysis of various reservoir shales, and evaluation of actual proppant samples that have been retrieved from producing wells.
The paper will conclusively demonstrate that crystalline precipitates can be formed on the surface of all proppant types, including ceramic, sand, resin-coated materials, and even inert steel balls or glass rods. The nature of these precipitants indicate that they may be classified as zeolites. The chemistry and environment leading to the formation of zeolite precipitates will be reviewed. Testing indicates that zeolites can be formed without the presence of alumina-bearing proppant and appear to be largely dependent on the characteristics of the formation material and fluid. Conductivity tests carefully simulating reservoir conditions with actual reservoir shale core samples indicate that if diagenetic precipitation does occur it does not appreciably affect conductivity performance in the flowing conditions evaluated. Furthermore, other conditions known to occur in oil and gas reservoirs would naturally prevent the formation of zeolites.
The results of this work will aid the stimulation engineer in proppant selection and treatment design. While there are many mechanisms contributing to the degradation of proppant performance, these studies indicate that zeolite precipitation is unlikely to be a dominant concern in most wells.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||14|
API RP 61, Recommended Practices for Evaluating Short Term Proppant PackConductivity. 1989. Washington, DC: API.
ASTM C1239-07, Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data andEstimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics. 2007.West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/C1239-07.
Barree, R.D., Cox, S.A., Barree, V.L., and Conway, M.W. 2003. RealisticAssessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Selection. Paper SPE84306 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver,5-8 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/84306-MS.
Branigan, P.T., Peterson, R.E., Warpinski, N.R., and Wright, T.B. 1996.Characterization of Remotely Intersected Set of Hydraulic Fractures: Results ofIntersection Well No. 1-B, GRI/DOE Multi-Site Project. Paper SPE 36452presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 6-9October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36452-MS.
Byrappa, K. and Yoshimura, M. 2011. Handbook of HydrothermalTechnology, second edition, Chap. 6. Norwich, New York: Materials Scienceand Process Technology Series, William Andrew Publishing/Elsevier.
Core Laboratories. 2009. Stim-Lab Proppant Conductivity Consortium, http://www.corelab.com/pe/stimlab/Consortia/ProppantConductivity.aspx (accessed June 2009).
Fast, R.E., Murer, A.S., and Timmer, R.S. 1994. Description and Analysis ofCored Hydraulic Fractures—Lost Hills Field, Kern County California. SPE Prod& Fac 9 (2): 107-114. SPE-24853-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24853-PA.
Franks, S.G. and Forester, R.W. 1984. Relationships Among SecondaryPorosity, Pore-Fluid Chemistry and Carbon Dioxide, Texas Gulf Coast: Part 1.Concepts and Principles. In Clastic Diagenesis, ed. D.A. McDonald andR.C. Surdam, No. 37, 63-79. Tulsa, Oklahoma: AAPG Memoir, AAPG.
Gdanski, R. 2001. Impact of Clay Acidity on the pH of Invading Fluids. PaperSPE 64983 presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry,Houston, 13-16 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/64983-MS.
Gidley, J.L., Penny, G.S., and McDaniel, R.R. 1992. Effect of ProppantFailure and Fines Migration on Conductivity of Propped Fractures. SPE Prod& Fac 10 (1): 20-25. SPE-24008-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24008-PA.
Grimes, W.D. and McNeil, R.I. 2005. Prediction of Hydrogen Sulfide andCarbon Dioxide in HPHT Wells. Paper SPE 97568 presented at the SPE HighPressure/High Temperature Sour Well Design Applied Technology Workshop, TheWoodlands, Texas, USA, 1-19 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/97568-MS.
Ibrahim, S.A.B. 2007. Synthesis and Characterization of Zeolites fromSodium Aluminosilicate Solutions. MS thesis, School of Materials andMineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang,Malaysia (August 2007).
Kingery, W.D. 1976. Introduction to Ceramics, second edition,797-806. New York: Wiley Series on the Science and Technology of Materials,John Wiley & Sons.
LaFollette, R.F. and Carman, P.S. 2010. Proppant Diagenesis: Results So Far.Paper SPE 131782 presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 23-25 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/131782-MS.
Mathews, S.G., Raghuraman, B., Rosiere, D.W., Wei, W., Colacelli, S., andRehman, H.A. 2009. Laboratory Measurement of pH of Live Waters at HighTemperatures and Pressures. Paper SPE 121695 presented at the SPE InternationalSymposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands. Texas, USA, 20-22 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/121695-MS.
Miller, R. 2010. Conductivity and Ceramic Diagenesis. Technical Report,Stim-Lab Proppant Conductivity Consortium, Duncan, Oklahoma.
Palisch, T., Duenckel, R., Bazan, L., Heidt, H.J., and Turk, G. 2007.Determining Realistic Fracture Conductivity and Understanding Its Impact onWell Performance--Theory and Field Examples. Paper SPE 106301 presented at theSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, College Station, Texas, USA,29-31 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/106301-MS.
Richerson, D.W. 1992. Modern Ceramic Engineering: Properties, Processing,and Use in Design, second edition (rev. and expanded), 326-328. New York:Marcel Dekker.
Smith, J.T. and Ehrenberg, S.N. 1989. Correlation of carbon dioxideabundance with temperature in clastic hydrocarbon reservoirs: relationship toinorganic chemical equilibrium. Mar. Pet. Geol. 6 (2):129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(89)90016-0.
Smith, K. 2010. Solids Speciation in Bakken Wells Across the Williston Basinand Their Implications to Future Production Challenges. Presentation 3, SessionVI at SPE ATW: Maximizing Tight Oil in the Bakken, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 4-6August.
Vincent, M.C. 2009. Examining Our Assumptions--Have OversimplificationsJeopardized Our Ability to Design Optimal Fracture Treatments? Paper SPE 119143presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands,Texas, USA, 19-21 January. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119143-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Lorenz, J.C., Branagan, P.T., Myal, F.R., and Gall, B.L.1993. Examination of a Cored Hydraulic Fracture in a Deep Gas Well. SPE Prod& Fac 8 (3): 150-158. SPE-22876-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22876-PA.
Weaver, J., Parker, M., van Batenburg, D., and Nguyen, P. 2006. SustainingConductivity. Paper SPE 98236 presented at the International Symposium andExhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 15-17February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/98236-MS.
Weaver, J., Rickman, R., and Luo, H. 2010. Fracture-Conductivity Loss Causedby Geochemical Interactions Between Man-Made Proppants and Formations. SPEJ. 15 (1): 116-124. SPE-118174-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/118174-PA.
Weaver, J.D., Nguyen, P.D., Parker, M.A., and van Batenburg, D. 2005.Sustaining Fracture Conductivity. Paper SPE 94666 presented at the SPE EuropeanFormation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 25-27 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94666-MS.