Multiphase Fluid-Loss Properties and Return Permeability of Energized Fracturing Fluids
- Lionel H. Ribeiro (University of Texas at Austin) | Mukul M. Sharma (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 265 - 277
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,107 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
With the growing interest in low-permeability gas plays, foam fracturing fluids are now well established as a viable alternative to traditional fracturing fluids. Present practices in energized fracturing treatments remain, nonetheless, rudimentary in comparison to other fracturing-fluid technologies because of our limited understanding of multiphase fluid-loss and phase behavior occurring in these complex fluids. This paper assesses the fluid-loss benefits introduced by energizing the fracturing fluid.
A new laboratory apparatus has been specifically designed and built for measuring the leakoff rates for both gas and liquid phases under dynamic fluid-loss conditions. This paper provides experimental leakoff results for linear guar gels and for N2/guar foam-based fracturing fluids under a wide range of fracturing conditions. In particular, the effects of the rock permeability, the foam quality, and the pressure drop are investigated. Analysis of dynamic leakoff data provides an understanding of the complex mechanisms of viscous invasion and filter-cake formation occurring at the pore scale.
This study presents data supporting the superior fluid-loss behavior of foams, which exhibit minor liquid invasion and limited damage. It also shows direct measurements of the ability of the gas component to leakoff into the invaded zone, thereby increasing the gas saturation around the fracture and enhancing the gas productivity during flowback. Our conclusions not only confirm but add to the findings of McGowen and Vitthal (1996a, b) for linear gels and the findings of Harris (1985) for nitrogen foams.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Economides, M.J. and Nolte, K.G. 2000. Reservoir Stimulation, thirdedition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Ettinger, R.A. and Radke, C.J. 1992. The Influence of Texture on Steady FoamFlow in Berea Sandstone. SPE Res Eng 7 (1): 83-90.SPE-19688-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/19688-PA.
Friehauf, K.E. and Sharma, M.M. 2009. Fluid Selection for EnergizedHydraulic Fractures. Paper SPE 124361 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4-7 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124361-MS.
Friehauf, K.E., Suri, A., and Sharma, M.M. 2010. A Simple and Accurate Modelfor Well Productivity for Hydraulically Fractured Wells. SPE Prod &Oper 25 (4): 453-460. SPE-119264-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119264-PA.
Garbis, S.J. and Taylor, J.L. III. 1986. The Utility of CO2 as anEnergizing Component for Fracturing Fluids. SPE Prod Eng 1(5): 351-358. SPE-13794-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13794-PA.
Grundmann, S.R. and Lord, D.L. 1983. Foam Stimulation. J Pet Technol 35 (3): 597-602. SPE-9754-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/9754-PA.
Harris, P.C. 1985. Dynamic Fluid Loss Characteristics of Foam FracturingFluids. J Pet Technol 37 (10): 1847-1852. SPE-11065-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11065-PA.
Harris, P.C. 1987. Dynamic Fluid-Loss Characteristics of CO2-Foam FracturingFluids. SPE Prod Eng 2 (2): 89-94. SPE-13180-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13180-PA.
Jiao, D. and Sharma, M.M. 1992. Formation damage due to static and dynamicfiltration of water-based muds. Paper SPE 23823 presented at the SPE FormationDamage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 26-27 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/23823-MS.
Khade, S.D. and Shah, S.N. 2004. New Rheological Correlations for Guar FoamFluids. SPE Prod & Fac 19 (2): 77-85. SPE-88032-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88032-PA.
King, G.E. 1986. Foam and Nitrified Fluid Treatments-Stimulation Techniquesand More. Paper SPE 14477 based on a speech presented as a DistinguishedLecture during the 1985-1986 season.
Kovscek, A.R. and Radke, C.J. 1994. Fundamentals of Foam Transport in PorousMedia. In Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the PetroleumIndustry, ed. L.L. Schramm, No. 242, 115-163. Washington, DC: Advances inChemistry Series, American Chemical Society.
McGowen, J.M. and Vitthal, S. 1996a. Fracturing-Fluid Leakoff Under DynamicConditions Part 1: Development of a Realistic Laboratory Testing Procedure.Paper SPE 36492 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Denver, 6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36492-MS.
McGowen, J.M. and Vitthal, S. 1996b. Fracturing Fluid Leakoff Under DynamicConditions Part 2: Effect of Shear Rate, Permeability, and Pressure. Paper SPE36493 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver,6-9 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/36493-MS.
Navarrete, R.C., Cawiezel, K.E., and Constien, V.G. 1996. Dynamic Fluid Lossin Hydraulic Fracturing Under Realistic Shear Conditions in High-PermeabilityRocks. SPE Prod & Fac 11 (3): 138-143. SPE-28529-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28529-PA.
Penny, G.S. and Conway, M.W. 1989. Fluid Leakoff. In Recent Advances inHydraulic Fracturing, ed. J.L. Gidley, S.A. Holditch, D.E. Nierode, andR.W. Veatch Jr., Vol. 12, 147-176. Richardson, Texas: Henry L. DohertyMonograph Series, SPE.
Reidenbach, V.G., Harris, P.C., Lee, Y.N., and Lord, D.L. 1986. Rheologicalstudy of foam fracturing fluids using nitrogen and carbon dioxide. SPE ProdEng 1 (1): 31-41. SPE-12026-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12026-PA.
Wendorff, C.L. and Ainley, B.R. 1981. Massive Hydraulic Fracturing ofHigh-Temperature Wells with Stable Frac Foams. Paper SPE 10257 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 4-7October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10257-MS.
Yi, T. and Peden, J.M. 1994. A Comprehensive Model of Fluid Loss inHydraulic Fracturing. SPE Prod & Oper 9 (4): 267-272.SPE-25493-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25493-PA.