A USD 100 Million "Rock": Bitumen in the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico
- Gang Han (Hess Corporation) | Jerry Osmond (Hess Corporation) | Michael Zambonini (Hess Corporation)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- September 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 290 - 299
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.11.2 Drilling Fluid Selection and Formulation (Chemistry, Properties), 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials
- Drilling strategy, deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Bitumen
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 556 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Bitumen encounters in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) are not unusual. In many cases, bitumen presence delayed or prevented reaching programmed total depth and adversely affected rig schedule and development planning. The cost from these events could be as high as USD 100 million. On the basis of a series of laboratory tests that investigate the effect of temperature, pressure, and drilling fluids on bitumen mechanical behaviors, this paper attempts to address four questions: (1) What is bitumen and what are its properties, especially at in-situ conditions (18,000-psi stress and 185°F temperature); (2) where is it found, in pore space or fracture; (3) what are the shapes of the in-situ accumulation; and (4) what drives it into the borehole? It has been found that the bitumen encountered at various depths may be significantly different. The bitumen adjacent to salt formation is likely to be stable and could accumulate in a large horizontal spread. The bitumen at the greater depth has to be close to vertical to survive in-situ stresses. For the horizontal bitumen spread, there is a potential to successfully drill through with a liner, and manipulating mud weight may also help. However, for the vertical-column bitumen, increasing mud weight may not be efficient, and sidetracking to avoid further encounter may be more practical. These findings are consistent with the drilling experience in the field and may help to develop a strategy to manage future bitumen encounters in the deepwater GOM.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Freeman, M.A., Stoian, A., Potapinski, J.W., Elias, L.C., and Tetreault, R.2004. Novel Drilling FluidEliminates Tar Problems Associated With Drilling SAGD Wells. Paper SPE90986 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibit, Houston,26-29 September . doi: 10.2118/90986-MS.
Han, G., Hunter, K., Osmond, J., Ressler, J., and Zambonini, M. 2008a. Drilling through Bitumen in the Gulfof Mexico: The Shallower vs. the Deeper. Paper OTC 19307 presented at theOffshore Technology Conference, Houston, 4-8 May. doi: 10.4043/19307-MS.
Han, G., Hunter, K., Ressler, J., and Osmond, J. 2008b. Deepwater Bitumen Drilling: WhatHappened Downhole? Paper SPE 111600 presented at the IADC/SPE DrillingConference, Orando, Florida, USA, 4-6 March. doi: 10.2118/111600-MS.
Harouaka, A.S., Mtawaa, B., and Nofal, W.A. 2002. Characterization of Tar From aCarbonate Reservoir in Saudi Arabia: Physical Aspects. Paper SPE 78538presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference,13-16 October. doi: 10.2118/78538-MS.
Huang, J., Han, G., Grush, K., McCormack, N., and Sulistyo, G. 2008.Hydrocarbon Bitumen in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico--An Integrated PetroleumSystems and Engineering Perspective. Presented at the 70th EAGE Conference andExhibition, Rome, 9-12 June.
Krishnan, J.M. and Rajagopal, K.R. 2003. Review of the uses and modeling ofbitumen from ancient to modern times. Appl. Mech. Rev. 56 (2): 149-214. doi:10.1115/1.1529658.
Perez, G.P. 2005. Developmentof a Chemical Treatment for the Management of Wellbore Tar Adhesion. PaperSPE 97721 presented at the SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations andHeavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 1-3 November. doi: 10.2118/97721-MS.
Rohleder, S.A., Sanders, W.W., Williamson, R.N., Faul, G.L., and Dooley,L.B. 2003. Challenges of Drillingan Ultra-Deep Well in Deepwater-Spa Prospect. Paper SPE 79810 presented atthe SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 19-21 February. doi:10.2118/79810-MS.
Romo, L.A., Prewett, H., Shaughnessy, J., Lisle, E., Banerjee, S., andWillson, S. 2007. ChallengesAssociated With Subsalt Tar in the Mad Dog Field. Paper SPE 110493presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim,California, USA, 11-14 November. doi: 10.2118/110493-MS.
Waxman, M.H., Closmann, P.J., and Deeds, C.T. 1980. Peace River Tar Flow Experiments UnderIn-Situ Conditions. Paper SPE 9511 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, 21-24 September. doi: 10.2118/9511-MS.
Weatherl, M.H. 2007. Encountering an Unexpected TarFormation in a Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Exploration Well. Paper SPE 105619presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 20-22 February. doi:10.2118/105619-MS.
Webster's Basic English Dictionary, updated edition. 1995.Springfield, Illinois: Merriam-Webster.