Reservoir Modeling: From RESCUE To RESQML
- Michael J. King (Texas A&M University) | Paulo R. Ballin (BP America) | Chakib Bennis (Institut Français du Pétrole) | David E. Heath (Transform Software) | Allan D. Hiebert (Computer Modelling Group) | William McKenzie (Chevron) | Jean-Francois Rainaud (Institut Français du Pétrole) | Jana Schey (Energistics)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2012
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 127 - 138
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.1.7 Seismic Processing and Interpretation, 5.5.2 Construction of Static Models, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.1.9 Four-Dimensional and Four-Component Seismic
- none provided
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 1,018 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The RESCUE consortium formed in 1995 in response to the requirement to transfer the structural framework, 3D gridded models, and associated well data from "geomodels to upscalers." RESCUE developed a data standard and libraries that allowed multiple vendors to support subsurface projects across the geoscience and engineering domains. To date, more than 20 of the sponsoring petroleum companies and application vendors have integrated RESCUE into their applications.
In late 2008, the consortium began a transition to a much more flexible standard: RESQMLTM. RESQML joins with WITSMLTM and PRODMLTM as the latest XML-based data-transfer standards managed by Energistics. The V1.0 developer's release of the RESQML data standard was published in December 2010, followed by a fully commercial V1.1 release in October 2011. We expect vendor applications using RESQML V1.1 to be available commercially in 2012.
RESQML has been designed to support
(a) Interaction with the real-time production and drilling domains
(b) Transfer of gigacell reservoir-simulation models, as are currently in use in some areas of the world, with static reservoir models, which may be several orders of magnitude larger
(c) Lossless data transfer for complex grids, especially for nonstandard connectivity
(d) Retention of the geologic and geophysical meta-data associated with 3D grids
(e) Data standards for flexible and iterative multivendor subsurface workflows across geology, geophysics, and engineering
As an example of the latter, workflows that support fault-seal analysis or 4D-seismic interpretation benefit greatly from the integration of data, metadata, and interpretations from multiple geophysical, geologic, and engineering applications into a coherent subsurface model. Such integration is not possible for a single application or vendor.
In this paper, we will present our objectives, challenges, and work plan for 3D/4D-reservoir-model exchange. Details of the technical design defined by participating oil companies and software vendors will be shared to demonstrate the efficiency of the RESQML standard.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Ballin, P.R., Clifford, P.J., and Christie, M.A. 2002. Cupiagua: Modeling ofa Complex Fractured Reservoir Using Compositional Upscaling. SPE Res Eval& Eng 5 (6): 488-498. SPE-81409-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/81409-PA.
Cheng, H., Dehghani, K., and Billiter, T.C. 2008. A Structured Approach forProbabilistic-Assisted History Matching Using Evolutionary Algorithms: TengizField Applications. Paper SPE 116212 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Denver, 21-24 September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116212-MS.
Dogru, A.H., Fung, L.S.K., Al-Shaalan, T.M., Middya, U., and Pita, J.A.2008. From Mega-Cell to Giga-Cell Reservoir Simulation. Paper SPE 116675presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21-24September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116675-MS.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). 2008. Dublin Core Metadata ElementSet, Version 1.1, http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/01/14/dces/(accessed 2008).
EAGE. 2010. EAGE Integrated Earth Modeling Conference: Are We Doing ItRight?, Dubai, 28 November-1 December (cancelled).
ECLIPSE Technical Description 2009.2. 2009. Abingdon, UK: SchlumbergerInformation Solutions.
Energistics. 2008. WITSML Standards (Ver. 1.4.0),http://www.energistics.org/witsml-standard (accessed 2008).
Energistics. 2009a. PRODML Standards (Ver. 1.2), http://www.energistics.org/prodml-standard(accessed 2009).
Energistics. 2009b. RESCUE Standards,http://energistics.org/rescue-standards (accessed 2009).
Energistics. 2009c. RESQML Standards,http://energistics.org/resqml-standards (accessed 2009).
Gutteridge, P.A., Watts, G.F.T., Nguyen, T.V., Gawith, D.E., and Daly, C.1993. Integrating geosciences and engineering to build detailed geologicalmodels of complex fields. Abstract presented at the 55th EAGE Meeting,Stavanger, Norway, 8 June.
Halliburton. 2009. VIP-CORE® Reference Manual, Ver. R5000.0.2.
Heinemann, Z.E., Brand, C.W., Munka, M., and Chen, Y.M. 1991. ModelingReservoir Geometry With Irregular Grids. SPE Res Eng 6 (2):225-232. SPE-18412-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18412-PA.
Henri-Bally, R., Rainaud, J.-F., Towery, L., et al. 2010. From RESCUE toRESQML: The open standard of Reservoir Earth Model takes up new dimensions andmomentum. Paper presented at the EAGE Conference & Exhibition/SPE EUROPEC2010, Barcelona, Spain, 14-17 June.
Lasseter, T.J. and Jackson, S.A. 2004. Improving integrated interpretationaccuracy and efficiency using a single consistent reservoir model from seismicto simulation. The Leading Edge 23 (11): 1118-1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1825932.
OGC. 2007. OpenGIS Geography Markup Language (GML) Encoding Standard (Ver.3.2.1), http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/gml.
OGP Geomatics Committee. 2010. EPSG Geodetic Parameter Dataset, http://www.epsg.org/.
Ponting, D.K. 1989. Corner point geometry in reservoir simulation.Proc., Joint IMA/SPE European Conference on the Mathematics of OilRecovery, Cambridge, UK, 25-27 July, 45-65.
Riddiford, F.A. and Goupillot, M. 1994. Geotechnical Integration and itsImpact on Field Management. The IRMA Methodology. Paper SPE 28932 presented atthe SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 25-28September. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28932-MS.
The HDF5 Group. 2010. HDF5 (Ver. 1.8.5), http://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/(accessed 2010).
Towery, L., Henri-Bally, R., Marcotte, D., and Heath, D. 2010. ImprovingInteroperability for Reservoir Modeling and Simulation Software. Hart'sE&P (August 2010). http://www.energistics.org/upload/resqml-harts-ep-article-august-2010.pdf.
Williams, M.A., Keating, J.F., and Barghouty, M.F. 1998. The StratigraphicMethod: A Structured Approach to History-Matching Complex Simulation Models.SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (2): 169-176. SPE-38014-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38014-PA.
Yin, J., Park, H., Datta-Gupta, A., and Choudhary, M.K. 2010. A HierarchicalStreamline-Assisted History Matching Approach With Global and Local ParameterUpdates. Paper SPE 132642 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting,Anaheim, California, USA, 27-29 May. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/132642-MS.