Simultaneous Estimation of Relative Permeability and Porosity/Permeability Fields by History Matching Production Data
- D. Eydinov (SPT Group) | G. Gao (Shell) | G. Li (University of Tulsa) | A.C. Reynolds (University of Tulsa)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- December 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 13 - 25
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.6.9 Production Forecasting, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 7.6.2 Data Integration, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation
- relative permeability estimation, history matching, B-spline approximation
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 1,223 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper presents a procedure to estimate relative permeability curves together with gridblock porosities and permeabilities by automatic history matching three-phase flow production data using the LBFGS algorithm for optimization and the adjoint method for generating sensitivity coefficients. Both power law and B-splines are considered for the representation of relative permeability curves. Power law functions provide a simple representation; however, B-splines have the advantage of being able to accurately represent any set of relative permeability curves. In the B-spline representation, we provide a simple procedure based on a transformation of parameters (control points) defining the B-splines to ensure that monotonic curves are obtained. Without this transformation, the automatic history-matching process fails. If endpoint saturations are included as parameters, we show how to modify the adjoint procedure to account for the fact that initial conditions are sensitive to endpoint saturations. While the history-matching process is inherently non-unique, we show that reasonable estimates of relative permeability curves and porosity/ permeability fields can be obtained for a synthetic reservoir example. We also provide a quantification of the uncertainty in model parameters and reservoir performance prediction using the randomized maximum likelihood (RML) method.
Usually, the relative permeability curves are obtained from labs through coreflood tests. However, they can also be incorporated into the history matching procedure as model parameters. Archer and Wong(1) and Yang and Watson(2) were among the early researchers to consider the estimation of relative permeability curves by history matching laboratory coreflood data. A detailed literature review is given in Reynolds et al.(3). Reynolds et al.(3) also discussed the estimation of three-phase relative permeabilities by history matching production data.
The current work is a natural extension of Reynolds et al.(3). In this paper, we provide an alternative method for relative permeability estimation based on B-spline approximation. Compared to power law representation, B-splines have the advantage of being able to accurately represent any set of relative permeability curves.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||13|
1. Archer, J.S. and Wong, S.W. 1973. Use of a Reservoir Simulator toInterpret Laboratory Waterflood Data. SPE J. 13 (6): 343-347.SPE-3551-PA. doi: 10.2118/3551-PA.
2. Yang, P.H. and Watson, A.T. 1991. A Bayesian Methodology for EstimatingRelative Permeability Curves. SPE Res Eng 6 (2): 259-265.SPE-18531-PA. doi: 10.2118/18531-PA.
3. Reynolds, A.C., Li, R., and Oliver, D.S. 2004. Simultaneous estimation of absoluteand relative permeability by automatic history matching of three-phase flowproduction data. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 43 (3): 37-46. doi:10.2118/04-03-03
4. Chen, S., Li, G., Peres, A.M.M, and Reynolds, A.C. 2008. A Well Test for In-Situ Determinationof Relative Permeability Curves. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (1):95-107. SPE-96414-PA. doi:10.2118/96414-PA.
5. Okano, H., Pickup, G.E., Christie, M.A., Subbey, S., Sambridge, M., andMonfared, H. 2005. Quantificationof Uncertainty in Relative Permeability for Coarse-Scale ReservoirSimulation. Proceedings of SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference. doi:10.2118/94140-MS
6. Tarantola, A. 1987. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fittingand Model Parameter Estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
7. Reynolds, A.C., He, N., and Oliver, D.S. 1999. Reducing uncertainty ingeostatistical description with well testing pressure data. In ReservoirCharacterization: Recent Advances, ed. R.A. Schatzinger and J.F. Jordan,No. 71, 149-162. Tulsa, Oklahoma: AAPG Memoir, AAPG.
8. Oliver, D.S., He, N., and Reynolds, A.C. 1996. Conditioning permeabilityfields to pressure data. Proc., 5th European Conference on theMathematics of Oil Recovery (ECMOR V), Leoben, Austria, 3-6 September,1-11.
9. Kitanidis, P.K. 1995. Quasi-linear geostatistical theoryfor inversing. Water Resources Research 31 (10): 2411-2419.doi:10.1029/95WR01945.
10. Gomez-Hemandez, J.J. and Journel, A.G. 1992. Joint sequential simulationof multigaussian fields. In Geostatistics Tróia ‘92, ed. A. Soares,133-144. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
11. Zhang, F. and Reynolds, A.C. 2002. Optimization algorithms for automatichistory matching of production data. Proc., 8th European Conference onthe Mathematics of Oil Recovery (ECMOR VIII), Frieiberg, Germany, 3-6September, 1-10.
12. Gao, G. and Reynolds, A.C. 2006. An Improved Implementation of theLBFGS Algorithm for Automatic History Matching. SPE J. 11(1): 5-17. SPE-90058-PA. doi:10.2118/90058-PA.
13. Stone, H. 1973. Estimationof Three-Phase Relative Permeability and Residual Oil Data. J. Can. Pet.Tech. 12 (4): 53-61. doi:10.2118/73-04-06
14. de Boor, C. 1978. A Practical Guide to Splines. New York: AppliedMathematical Sciences, Springer.
15. Lane, J.M. and Reisenfeld, R.F. 1983. A geometric proof for thevariation diminishing property of B-spline approximation. Journalof Approximation Theory 37 (1): 1-4.doi:10.1016/0021-9045(83)90111-9.
16. Aziz, K. and Settari, A. 1979. Petroleum Reservoir Simulation.Essex, UK: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.
17. Li, R., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver, D.S. 2003. History Matching of Three-Phase FlowProduction Data. SPE J. 8 (4): 328-340. SPE-87336-PA.doi:10.2118/87336-PA.
18. Gao, G. 2005. Data Integration and Uncertainty Evaluation for LargeScale Automatic History Matching Problems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tulsa,Tulsa, Oklahoma.
19. Floris, F.J.T., Bush, M.D., Cuypers, M., Roggero, F., and Syversveen,A-R. 2001. Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: Acomparative study. Petroleum Geoscience 7 (Supplement, 1 May):87-96.