Solvent-Type and -Ratio Impacts on Solvent-Aided SAGD Process
- Weiqiang Li (Texas A&M University) | Daulat D. Mamora (Texas A&M University) | Yamin Li (Occidental Petroleum Corporation)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 320 - 331
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 5.4.10 Microbial Methods, 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5.1 Simulator Development, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors
- Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), Solvent coinjection, Drainage mechanism, Athabasca
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 1,410 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Coinjecting solvent with steam under a steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) process to reduce the required steam for production has gained importance in recent years. An extensive 2D simulation study to better understand the drainage mechanism of steam-with-solvent coinjection in the SAGD process shows that the condensation time difference of solvent and steam results in different films of gas solvent, liquid solvent, and water along the fluid interface. There is an optimal solvent-type and -concentration-ratio range for a particular reservoir and operating condition. Coinjecting the solvent at low concentration ratios can take advantage of the solvent dilution effect without losing too much heat effect from steam. In addition, this study indicates coinjection of suitable solvent mixtures may lead to better performance than injection of pure solvent in the field.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Butler, R.M. 1997. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Calgary:GravDrain Inc.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1991. A New Process (VAPEX) for RecoveringHeavy Oils Using Hot Water and Hydrocarbon Vapour. J Can Pet Technol 30 (1): 97-106.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1993a. In-Situ Upgrading of Heavy Oils andBitumen by Propane De-Asphalting: The VAPEX Process. Paper SPE 25452 presentedat the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 21-23March. doi:10.2118/25452-MS.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1993b. Recovery of Heavy Oils Using VaporizedHydrocarbon Solvents: Further Development of the VAPEX Process. J Can PetTechnol 32 (6): 38-55.
Butler, R.M. and Mokrys, I.J. 1998. Closed Loop Extraction Method for theRecovery of Heavy Oils and Bitumens Underlain by Aquifers: The VAPEX Process.J Can Pet Technol 37 (4): 41-50. JCPT Paper No. 98-04-04.doi: 10.2118/98-04-04.
ConocoPhillips. 2009. Challenged resources, http://www.conocophillips.com/EN/tech/upstream/challenged/Pages/index.aspx.
Deng, X. 2005. Recovery Performance and Economics of Steam/Propane HybridProcess. Paper SPE 97760 presented at SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International ThermalOperations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 1-3 November. doi: 10.2118/97760-MS.
Farouq Ali, S.M. and Abad, B. 1976. Bitumen Recovery from Oil Sands, UsingSolvents in Conjunction With Steam. J Can Pet Technol 15(3): 80-90. JCPT Paper No. 76-03-11. doi: 10.2118/76-03-11.
Gates, I.D. 2007. Oil phase viscosity behaviour in Expanding SolventSteam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 59(1-2): 123-134. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2007.03.006.
Govind, P.A., Das, S.K., Srinivasan, S., and Wheeler, T.J. 2008. ExpandingSolvent SAGD in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 117571 presented at theInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 30-23October. doi:10.2118/117571-MS.
Gupta, S. and Gittins, S. 2005. Christina Lake Solvent Aided Process Pilot.Paper No. 2005-190 presented at the Petroleum Society's CIPC/Annual TechnicalMeeting, Calgary, 7-9 June.
Gupta, S., Gittins, S., and Picherack, P. 2002. Field Implementation ofSolvent Aided Process. Paper No. 2002-299 presented at the Petroleum Society'sCanadian International Petroleum Conference (CIPC), Calgary, 11-13 June.
Law, D.H.-S. and Nasr, T.N. 2000. Field-Scale Numerical Simulation of SAGDProcess with Top-Water Zone. Paper SPE 65522 presented at SPE/CIM InternationalConference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, 6-8 November. doi: 10.2118/65522-MS.
Leaute, R.P. 2002. Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhancing Recovery (LASER)of Bitumen with CSS: Evolution of Technology From Research Concept to a FieldPilot at Cold Lake. Paper SPE 79011 presented at the SPE International ThermalOperations and Heavy Oil Symposium and International Horizontal Well TechnologyConference, Calgary, 4-7 November. doi: 10.2118/79011-MS.
Leaute, R.P. and Carey, B.S. 2005. Liquid addition to steam for enhancingrecovery (LASER) of bitumen with CSS: Results from the first pilot cycle. Paper2005-161 presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference (CIPC),Calgary, 7-9 June.
Li, W., Mamora, D. D., and Li, Y., 2011a. Light- and Heavy-Solvent Impactson solvent-Aided-SAGD process: A Low- Pressure Experimental study. J Can PetTechnol 50 (4).
Li, W., Mamora, D. D., Li, Y., and Qiu F. D., 2011b. Numerical Investigationof Potential Injection Strategies to Reduce Shale Barrier Impacts on SAGDProcess. J Can Pet Technol 50 (3).
Mehrotra, A.K. and Svrcek, W.Y. 1986. Viscosity of compressed Athabascabitumen. The Canadian J. of Chemical Engineering 64 (5):844-847. doi:10.1002/cjce.5450640520.
Nasr, T.N. and Ayodele, O.R. 2005. Thermal Techniques for the Recovery ofHeavy Oil and Bitumen. Paper SPE 97488 presented at SPE International ImprovedOil Recovery Conference in Asia Pacific, Kuala Lumpur, 5-6 December. doi: 10.2118/97488-MS.
Nasr, T.N. and Ayodele, O.R. 2006. New Hybrid Steam-Solvent Process for theRecovery of Heavy Oil and Bitumen. Paper SPE 101717 presented at the Abu DhabiInternational Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, 5-8 November. doi: 10.2118/101717-MS.
Nasr, T.N., Beaulieu, G., Golbeck, H., and Heck, G. 2003. Novel ExpendingSolvent-SAGD Process ES-SAGD. J Can Pet Technol 42 (1):13-16.
Poling, B.E., Prausnitz, J.M., and O'Connell, J.P. 2000. The Propertiesof Gases and Liquids, fifth edition (hardback). New York City: McGraw-HillProfessional.
Redford, D.A. 1982. The Use of Solvents and Gases with Steam in the Recoveryof Bitumen From Oil Sands. J Can Pet Technol 21 (1): 45-53.JCPT Paper No. 82-01-03. doi:10.2118/82-01-03.
Redford, D.A. and McKay, A.S. 1980. Hydrocarbon-Steam Processes for Recoveryof Bitumen from Oil Sands. Paper SPE 8823 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced OilRecovery Symposium, Tulsa, 20-23 April. doi: 10.2118/8823-MS.
Shu, W.R. 1984. A Viscosity Correlation for Mixtures of Heavy Oil, Bitumen,and Petroleum Fractions. SPE J. 24 (3): 277-282.SPE-11280-PA. doi:10.2118/11280-PA.
Shu, W.R. and Hartman, K.J. 1988. Effect of Solvent on Steam Recovery ofHeavy Oil. SPE Res Eng 3 (2): 457-465. SPE-14223-PA. doi: 10.2118/14223-PA.
Thomas, S. 2007. Enhanced Oil Recovery--An Overview. Oil & GasScience and Technology--Rev. IFP 63 (1): 9-19. doi:10.2516/ogst:2007060.
Zhao, L. 2004a. Steam Alternating Solvent Process. Paper SPE 86957 presentedat the SPE Symposium on International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil andWestern Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA, 16-18 March. doi: 10.2118/86957-MS.
Zhao, L., Nasr, T.N., Hyang, H., Beaulieu, G., Heck, G., and Golbeck, H.2004b. Steam Alternating Solvent Process: Lab Test and Simulation. Paper SPE2004-044 presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary,8-10 June. doi:10.2118/2004-044.