Investigation of Effect of Fracturing Fluid on After-Closure Analysis in Gas Reservoirs
- Mohamed Y. Soliman (Halliburton) | Carlos Miranda (Halliburton) | Hong Max Wang (Halliburton) | Kim Thornton (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 185 - 194
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation
- MiniFrac, after closure analysis, FET, Hydraulic fracturing, DFIT
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 947 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Published techniques for analysis of after-closure fracture data usually assume single-phase flow. These procedures generally rely on the techniques developed for the analysis of buildup tests. Applying the buildup techniques implies that the injected fluid and reservoir fluid have approximately the same properties. This assumption is generally incorrect in case of minifrac tests where the injected fluid may be very different from the reservoir fluids. This situation is at an extreme when the minifrac test is conducted on a gas reservoir and the injected fluid may be a relatively high-viscosity gelled fluid.
In this paper, we review the basic theory behind after-closure analysis. Using a numerical simulator, minifrac tests are simulated and analyzed for both oil- and gas-reservoir cases where an aqueous phase is injected as a fracturing fluid. Analyses of the numerically simulated falloff data are presented. Guidelines for the analysis of such data have been developed and presented.
Field data are also presented. In one case, breakdown, step-rate, and fluid-efficiency tests (FETs) were performed on a tight gas formation and the data were analyzed. The results of using these various techniques are presented. The consistency of results validates conclusions achieved using the numerically simulated data.
|File Size||5 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Abousleiman, Y., Cheng, A.H-D., and Gu, H. 1994. Formation PermeabilityDetermination by Micro or Mini-Hydraulic Fracturing. Journal of EnergyResources Technology 116 (2): 104-114.
Ansah, J., Soliman, M. Y., Ali, S., Moreno C., Jorquera, R., and Warren, J.2006. Optimization of Conformance Decisions Using a New Well-InterventionSimulator. Paper SPE 99697 presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved OilRecovery, Tulsa, 22-26 April. doi:10.2118/99697-MS.
Chen, S., Li, G., and Reynolds A.C. 2006. Analytical Solution forInjection-Falloff-Production Tests. Paper SPE 103271 presentation at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27September. doi:10.2118/103271-MS.
Gu, H., Eibel, J.L., Nolte, K.G., Cheng, A.H-D., and Abousleiman, Y. 1993.Formation Permeability Determination Using Impulse-Fracture Injection. PaperSPE 25425 presented at the Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City,Oklahoma, USA, 21-23 March. doi:10.2118/25425-MS.
Mayerhofer M.J., Ehlig-Economides, C.A., and Economides, M.J. 1995.Pressure-Transient Analysis of Fracture-Calibration Tests. J Pet Technol 47 (3): 229-234; Trans., AIME, 299. SPE-26527-PA. doi: 10.2118/26527-PA.
Nolte, K.G. 1979. Determination of Fracture Parameters from FracturingPressure Decline. Paper SPE 8341 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 23-26 September. doi: 10.2118/8341-MS.
Nolte, K.G. 1986. A General Analysis of Fracturing Pressure Decline WithApplication to Three Models. SPE Form Eval 1 (6): 571-583;Trans., AIME, 281. SPE-12941-PA. doi: 10.2118/12941-PA.
Nolte, K.G., Maniere, J.L., and Owens, K.A. 1997. After-Closure Analysis ofFracture Calibration Tests. Paper SPE 38676 presented at SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 5-8 October. doi: 10.2118/38676-MS.
Pacheco, E., Castro, R., Soliman, M.Y., and Flores, F. 2007. AdvancedNumerical Simulator To Predict Productivity for Conventional andNon-conventional Well Architecture. Paper SPE 107629 presented at the LatinAmerican & Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, 15-18April. doi:10.2118/107629-MS.
Soliman, M.Y., Azari, M., Ansah, J., and Kabir, C.S. 2004. Design,Interpretation, and Assessment of Short-Term, Pressure-Transient Tests. PaperSPE 90837 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Houston, 26-29 September. doi:10.2118/90837-MS.
Soliman, M.Y., Craig, D., Bartko, K. and Rahim, Z., Ansah, J., and Adams, D.2005. New Method For Determination of Formation Permeability, ReservoirPressure, and Fracture Properties from a Minifrac Test. Proc., 40th U.S.Rock Mechanics Symposium (Alaska Rocks 2005): Rock Mechanics for Energy,Mineral and Infrastructure Development in the Northern Regions, Anchorage,ARMA/USRMS 05-658.
Valkó, P.P. and Economides, M.J. 1999. Fluid-Leakoff Delineation inHigh-Permeability Fracturing. SPE Prod & Fac 14 (2):110-116. SPE-56135-PA. doi:10.2118/56135-PA.