A Novel Application of Closed-Fracture Acidizing
- Maysam Pournik (University of Oklahoma) | Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din (Texas A&M University) | Mohamed A. Mahmoud (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 18 - 29
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 3.2.4 Acidising, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing
- acid fracturing
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,247 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The success of acid fracturing depends on the conductivity created and retained under closure stress in addition to the length of conductive fracture. The majority of acid-fracturing treatments show a sharp decline in conductivity with increasing closure stress, with almost no significant conductivity after a short production time. As a result, many wells are refractured to restore them to the original productivity after the initial fracture. However, the success of these refracture treatments has been diverse with respect to extent of stimulation.
A new approach to overcome productivity decline of acid-fractured wells is to perform closed-fracture acidizing (CFA) at the appropriate time in the life of the well to keep fractures conductive. An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effect of CFA on already-acid-fractured cores exposed to a certain level of closure stress. Indiana limestone cores were acidized with a typical acid system of 15 wt% hydrochloric acid (HCl) viscosified with a polymer under typical field conditions. After the first acidizing process, conductivity measurements were conducted on acid-etched core faces up to a certain closure stress. While the fracture was kept under the closure stress, a CFA treatment was conducted under the same conditions as the initial acidizing. The re-etched fractures were once again placed under different levels of closure stress, and conductivity measurements were taken at each stress. Experiments were conducted under different conditions of leakoff, polymer concentration, and closure stress after the first acidizing in order to determine the influence of these parameters on the refracturing conductivity.
In all cases, CFA enhanced fracture-face etching, while it significantly increased fracture conductivity under closure stress. However, leakoff, polymer concentration, and closure stress did influence the degree of success of CFA. Leakoff allowance and lower polymer concentration resulted in the most enhanced fracture conductivity in comparison to the initial acid-fracturing process.
|File Size||708 KB||Number of Pages||12|
Abass, H.H., Al-Mulhem, A.A., Alqam, M.S., and Mirajuddin, K.R. 2006. Acid Fracturing or ProppantFracturing in Carbonate Formation? A Rock Mechanics View. Paper SPE 102590presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,Texas, USA, 24-27 September. doi: 10.2118/102590-MS.
Anderson, M.S. and Fredrickson, S.E. 1989. Dynamic Etching Tests AidFracture-Acidizing Treatment Design. SPE Prod Eng 4(4): 443-449. SPE-16452-PA. doi: 10.2118/16452-PA.
Aud, W.W., Sullivan, R.B., Coalson, E.B., Poulson, T.D., and Warembourg,P.A. 1992. Acid RefracturingProgram Increases Reserves, Cottonwood Creek Unit, Washakie County,Wyoming. J Pet Technol 44 (1): 91-97. SPE-21821-PA.doi: 10.2118/21821-PA.
Bartko, K.M., Conway, M.W., Krawietz, T.E., Marquez, R.B., and Oba, R.G.M.1992. Field and LaboratoryExperience in Closed Fracture Acidizing the Lisburne Field, Prudhoe Bay,Alaska. Paper SPE 24855 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference,Washington, DC, 4-7 October. doi: 10.2118/24855-MS.
Conway, M.W., McMechan, D.E., McGowen, J.M., Brown, D., Chisholm, P.T., andVenditto, J.J. 1985. ExpandingRecoverable Reserves Through Refracturing. Paper SPE 14376 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 22-25September. doi: 10.2118/14376-MS.
Elbel, J.L. and Mack, M.G. 1993. Refracturing: Observation andTheories. Paper SPE 25464 presented at the SPE Production OperationsSymposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 21-23 March. doi:10.2118/25464-MS.
Fredrickson, S.E. 1986. Stimulating Carbonate FormationsUsing a Closed Fracture Acidizing Technique. Paper SPE 14654 presented atthe SPE East Texas Regional Meeting, Tyler, Texas, USA, 21-22 April. doi:10.2118/14654-MS.
Fredrickson, S.E. and Knox, J.A. 1973. Method of Fracture Acidizing a WellFormation. US Patent No. 3,768,564.
Garzon, F.O., Al-Marrri, H.M., Solares, J.R., Franco Giraldo, C.A., andRamanathan, V. 2008. Long TermEvaluation of an Innovative Acid System for Fracture Stimulation of CarbonateReservoirs in Saudi Arabia. Paper IPTC 12668 presented at the InternationalPetroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 3-5 December. doi:10.2523/12668-MS.
Howard, G.C. and Fast, C.R. 1970. Hydraulic Fracturing. MonographSeries, SPE, Richardson, Texas 2.
Inda, A., Steffani, O., Soriano, E., and Robles, F. 2009. Field Development and ProductivityImprovement in Offshore Mexico: An Engineering and Laboratory SynergisticApproach to Carbonate Fracture Acidizing. Paper SPE 121928 presented at the8th European Formation Damage Conference, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 27-29May. doi: 10.2118/121928-MS.
Kalfayan, L. 2000. Production Enhancement with Acid Stimulation,169-179. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell Corporation.
Nasr-El-Din, H.A., A.A. Zahrani, A.A., Garzon, F.O., Giraldo, C.A.F.,Al-Hakami, I.M., and Al-Marri, H.M. 2009. Acid Fracturing of Gas Wells by Useof an Acid Precursor in the Form of Solid Beads: Lessons Learned From FirstField Application. SPE Prod & Oper 24 (2): 320-335.SPE-110895-PA. doi: 10.2118/110895-PA.
Nasr-El-Din, H.A., Al-Driweesh, S.M., Metcalf, A.S., and Chesson, J.B. 2008.Fracture Acidizing: What RoleDoes Formation Softening Play in Production Response? SPE Prod &Oper 23 (2): 184-191. SPE-103344-PA. doi:10.2118/103344-PA.
Parrot, D.I. and Long, M.G. 1979. A Case History of Massive HydraulicRefracturing in the Tight Muddy "J" Formation. Paper SPE 7936 presented atthe Symposium on Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs, Denver, 20-22 May. doi:10.2118/7936-MS.
Pournik, M., Zou, C., Malagon, C., Melendez, M.G., Zhu, D., Hill, A.D., andWeng, X. 2007. Small-ScaleFracture Conductivity Created by Modern Acid-Fracture Fluids. Paper SPE106272 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, CollegeStation, Texas, USA, 29-31 January. doi: 10.2118/106272-MS.
Pursell, D.A., Holditch, S.A., and Blakeley, D. 1988. Laboratory Investigation of InertialFlow in High-Strength Fracture Proppants. Paper SPE 18319 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 2-5 October. doi:10.2118/18319-MS.
Reese, J.L., Britt, L.K., and Jones, J.R. 1994. Selecting Economic RefracturingCandidates. Paper SPE 28490 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 25-28 September. doi:10.2118/28490-MS.
Sizer, J.P., Moullem, A.S., and Abou-Sayed, I.S. 1991. Evaluation of Closed FractureAcidizing Performed in a Tight Limestone Formation. Paper SPE 21440presented at the Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 16-19 November. doi:10.2118/21440-MS.
Soliman, M.Y., Hunt, J.L., and Daneshi, T. 1990. Well-Test Analysis Following aClosed-Fracture Acidizing Treatment. SPE Form Eval 5(4): 369-374; Trans., AIME, 289. SPE-17972-PA. doi:10.2118/17972-PA.
Taylor, K.C., Nasr-El-Din, H.A., and Mehta, S. 2006. Anomalous Acid Reaction Rates inCarbonate Reservoir Rocks. SPE J. 11 (4): 488-496.SPE-89417-PA. doi: 10.2118/89417-PA.
Wang, X., Zou, H., Zheng, X., Zhang, F., Fan, Y., Cheng, X., and Zhang, R.2003. Optimization of AcidFracturing to Improve Heavy Oil Production in Naturally FracturedCarbonates. Paper SPE 80897 presented at the SPE Production and OperationsSymposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 22-25 March. doi:10.2118/80897-MS.