A Study of the Effects of Colloidal Gas Aphron Composition on Pore Blocking
- Nancy Bjorndalen (University of Alberta) | Jose Alvarez (Alberta Research Council) | Eddie Jossy (Alberta Research Council) | Ergun Kuru (University of Alberta)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- March 2011
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 139 - 150
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.8 Formation Damage, 3.2.4 Acidising, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials
- colloidal gas aphrons, drilling fluids, formation damage
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 679 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Drilling fluid containing colloidal gas aphron (CGA) microbubbles can bridge the pores of the reservoir rock in the near-wellbore region and reduce the risks of lost circulation and formation damage. The advantage of using CGA systems is that the CGAs can be removed easily during the initial stages of production, thereby reducing the costs associated with stimulation processes such as acidizing.
Although there has been some work performed on the flow of the microbubbles through porous media, little is known about the optimal conditions for blocking the pores. Specifically, the effect of the interaction between microbubbles and reservoir fluid on the microbubble stability and pore-blocking ability has not been determined.
This study is focused on determining effects of CGA composition on the resistance to the flow of microbubbles through porous media. Increasing resistance to fluid flow was observed as more CGA fluid was injected, indicating that microbubbles could effectively block the pores.
Effects of water, brine, mineral oil, and crude oil, as saturating fluids, on the microbubble stability and pore-blocking ability were also investigated.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Aarra, M.G. and Skauge, A. 1994. A Foam Pilot in a North Sea OilReservoir: Preparation for a Production Well Treatment. Paper SPE 28599presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,25-28 September. doi: 10.2118/28599-MS.
Albrecht, R.A. and Marsden, S.S. 1970. Foams as Blocking Agents in PorousMedia. SPE J. 10 (1): 51-55. SPE-2357-PA. doi:10.2118/2357-PA.
Bjorndalen, N. and Kuru, E. 2008a. Physico-Chemical Characterizationof Aphron-Based Drilling Fluids. J Can Pet Technol 47(11): 15-21. JCPT Paper No. 08-11-15-CS. doi: 10.2118/08-11-15-CS.
Bjorndalen, N. and Kuru, E. 2008b. Stability of Microbubble BasedDrilling Fluids Under Downhole Conditions. J Can Pet Technol 47 (6): 40-47. JCPT Paper No. 08-06-40. doi: 10.2118/08-06-40.
Bjorndalen, N., Jossy, E., Alvarez, J.M., and Kuru, E. 2008. Reducing Formation Damage withMicrobubble Based Drilling Fluids: Understanding the Blocking Ability. JCan Pet Technol 47 (11): 63-69. JCPT Paper No. 08-11-63. doi:10.2118/08-11-63.
Bora, R., Chakma, A., and Maini, B.B. 2003. Experimental Investigation of FoamyOil Flow Using a High Pressure Etched Glass Micromodel. Paper SPE 84033presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8October. doi: 10.2118/84033-MS.
Edwards, S., Matsutsuyu, B., and Willson, S. 2004. Imaging Unstable Wellbores WhileDrilling. SPE Drill & Compl 19 (4): 236-243.SPE-79846-PA. doi: 10.2118/79846-PA.
Growcock, F.B. 2005. Enhanced Wellbore Stabilization and ReservoirProductivity with Aphron Drilling Fluid Technology. Final Report, Award No.DE-FC26-03NT42000, US DOE, Washington, DC (1 October-30 September 2005).
Growcock, F.B., Belkin, A., Fosdick, M., Irving, M., O'Connor, B., andBrookey, T. 2006. Recent Advancesin Aphron Drilling Fluids. Paper SPE 97982 presented at the IADC/SPEDrilling Conference, Miami, Florida, USA, 21-23 February. doi:10.2118/97982-MS.
Hanssen, J.E. and Dalland, M. 1990. Foams for Effective Gas Blockage inthe Presence of Crude Oil. Paper SPE 20193 presented at the SPE/DOEEnhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22-25 April. doi: 10.2118/20193-MS.
Hornbrook, J.W., Castanier, L.M., and Pettit, P.A. 1991. Observations of Foam/Oil Interactionsin a New High Resolution Micromodel. Paper SPE 22631 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 6-9 October. doi:10.2118/22631-MS.
Khalil, F. and Asghari, K. 2006. Application of CO2-foam as a Means ofReducing CO2 Mobility. J Can Pet Technol 45 (1): 37-42.JCPT Paper No. 06-05-02. doi: 10.2118/06-05-02.
Mast, R.F. 1972. MicroscopicBehavior of Foam in Porous Media. Paper SPE 3997 presented at the FallMeeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, San Antonio, Texas, USA,8-11 October. doi: 10.2118/3997-MS.
Nimir, H.B. and Seright, R.S. 1996. Placement Properties of Foams VersusGelants When Used as Blocking Agents. Paper SPE 35172 presented at thePermian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, USA, 27-29March. doi: 10.2118/35172-MS.
Owete, O.S. and Brigham, W.E. 1987. Flow Behavior of Foam: A PorousMicromodel Study. SPE Res Eng 2 (3): 313-323.SPE-11349-PA. doi: 10.2118/11349-PA.
Seright, R.S. and Liang, J.A. 1995. Comparison of Different Types ofBlocking Agents. Paper SPE 30120 presented at the SPE European FormationDamage Conference, The Hague, 15-16 May. doi: 10.2118/30120-MS.
Smith, C.L., Anderson, J.L., and Roberts, P.G. 1969. New Diverting Techniques for Acidizingand Fracturing. Paper SPE 2751 presented at the SPE California RegionalMeeting, San Francisco, 6-7 November. doi: 10.2118/2751-MS.
Vassenden, F., Holt, T., Moen, A., and Ghaderi, A. 2000. Foam Propagation in the Absence andPresence of Oil. Paper SPE 59284 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved OilRecovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3-5 April. doi: 10.2118/59284-MS.