How the In-Situ Combustion Process Works in a Fractured System: 2D Core- and Block-Scale Simulation
- Hossein Fadaei (Institut Français du Pétrole) | Gerald Debenest (Université de Toulouse) | Arjan M. Kamp (Open and Experimental Centre for Heavy Oil) | Michel Quintard (Université de Toulouse) | Gerard Renard (Institut Français du Pétrole)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 118 - 130
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 4.3.4 Scale, 4.3.3 Aspaltenes, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.4.10 Microbial Methods, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 794 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Simulation of an in-situ combustion (ISC) process was performed for a fractured system at core and matrix-block scales. The aim of this work was: (1) To predict the ISC extinction/propagation condition(s), (2) understand the mechanism of oil recovery, and (3) provide some guidelines for ISC upscaling for a fractured system. The study was based on a fine-grid, single-porosity, multiphase, and multicomponent simulation using a thermal reservoir simulator.
First, the simulator was validated for 1D combustion using the corresponding analytical solutions. 2D combustion was validated using experimental results available in the literature. It was found that the grid size should not be larger than the combustion-zone thickness in order for the results to be independent of grid size. ISC in the fractured system was strongly dependent on the oxygen diffusion coefficient, while the matrix permeability played an important role in oil production. The effect of each production mechanism was studied separately whenever it was possible. Oil production is governed mainly by oil drainage because of gravity force, which is enhanced by viscosity reduction; possible pressure-gradient generation in the ISC process seems to have a minor effect. The nature (oil-production rate, saturations distribution, shape of the combustion front) of ISC at core scale was different from that in a single block with surrounding fracture. The important characteristics of different zones (i.e., combustion, coke, and oil zones) at block scale were studied, and some preliminary guidelines for upscaling are presented.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Akin, S., Kok, M.V., Bagci, S., and Karacan, Ö. 2000. Oxidation of Heavy Oil and Their SARAFractions: Its Role in Modeling In-situ Combustion. Paper SPE 63230presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4October. doi: 10.2118/63230-MS.
Aldushin, A.P. and Matkowsky, B.J. 2000. Diffusion Driven CombustionWaves in Porous Media. Combustion Science and Technology 156 (1): 221-250. doi:10.1080/00102200008947304.
Audibert, A. and Monin, J.C. 1985. Laboratory Simulation of Thermal Changesof Heavy Crudes during Thermal Recovery. Presented at the 3rd UNITAR (UNDP)Conference on Heavy Crudes and Tar Sands, Long Beach, California, USA, 22-31July.
Awoleke, O.G. 2007. An Experimental Investigation of In-situ Combustion inHeterogeneous Porous Media. MS thesis, Stanford University, Stanford,California.
Butler, R.M. 1991. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. EnglewoodCliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Castanier, L.M. and Brigham, W.E. 2003. Upgrading of crude oilvia in-situ combustion. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 39 (1-2):125-136. doi:10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00044-5.
Castanier, L.M., Ramey, H.J. Jr., and Brigham, W.E. 1992. Thermal RecoveryResearch at Stanford University. Proc., VNIGRI Symposium on Enhanced OilRecovery, St. Petersburg, Russia, 11-12 October.
Crawford, P.B and Chu, C. 1983. Chapter Six. In Improved OilRecovery, ed. C.R. Hocott and D.C. Bond, Chapter VI. Oklahoma City,Oklahoma: Interstate Oil Compact Commission.
Debenest, G., Mourzenko, V.V., and Thovert, J.-F. 2005. Smoldering in fixed beds ofoil shale grains: governing parameters and global regimes. CombustionTheory and Modeling 9 (2): 301-321.doi:10.1080/13647830500098365.
Fadaei, H., Debenest, G., Kamp, A.M., Quintard, M., and Renard, G. 2008.Study of Heavy Oil Recovery from a Fractured Carbonate Reservoir Using In-situCombustion. Presented at the 11th European Conference on the Mathematics of OilRecovery, Bergen, Norway, 8-11 September.
Farouq Ali, S.M and Meldau, P.B. 1983. In Improved Oil Recovery, ed. C.R.Hocott and D.C. Bond, Chapter VII. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: Interstate OilCompact Commission.
Fassihi, M.R., Brigham, W.E., Ramey, H.J. Jr., and Henry, J. 1984. Reaction Kinetics of In-SituCombustion: Part 1--Observations. SPE J. 24 (4):399-407. SPE-8907-PA. doi: 10.2118/8907-PA.
Freitag, N.P. and Exelby, D.R. 2006. SARA Based Model for SimulatingPyrolysis Reactions That Occur in High Temperature EOR Processes. J. Cdn.Pet. Tech. 45 (3): 38-44.
Greaves, M. and Turta A.T. 1997. Oilfield in-situ combustion process. USPatent No. 5,626,191/Canadian Patent No. 2,176,639.
Greaves, M., Javanmardi, J., and Field, W. 1991. In-situ Combustion inFractured Heavy Oil Reservoir. Presented at the 6th European IOR Symposium,Stavanger, Norway, 21-23 May.
Kumar, M. 1987. Simulation ofLaboratory In-situ Combustion Data and Effect of Process Variation. PaperSPE 16027 presented at the SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, San Antonio,Texas, USA, 1-4 February. doi: 10.2118/16027-MS.
Lacroix, S., Delaplace, P., Bourbiaux, B., and Foulon, D. 2004. Simulation of Air Injection inLight-Oil Fractured Reservoirs: Setting-Up a Predictive Dual PorosityModel. Paper SPE 89931 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. doi: 10.2118/89931-MS.
Miller, J.S and Ray, J. 1883. Laboratory Experiments Simulating FireFlooding Through a Fractured Reservoir. Report, No. DE 83009350, United StatesDepartment of Energy, Washington, DC (April 1883).
Moore, R.G., Belgrave, J.D.M., Mehta, R., Ursenbach, M., Laureshen, C.J.,and Xi, K. 1992. Some InsightsInto the Low-Temperature and High-Temperature In-Situ Combustion Kinetics.Paper SPE 24174 presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium,Tulsa, 22-24 April. doi: 10.2118/24174-MS.
Moore, R.G., Laureshen, C.J., Ursenbach, M., Mehta, R., and Belgrave, J.D.M.1996. Combustion/OxidationBehavior of Athabasca Oil Sands Bitumen. Paper SPE 35392 presented at theSPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 21-24 April. doi:10.2118/35392-MS.
Moore, R.G., Mehta, S.A., Ursenbach, M.G., and Laureshen, C.J. 1998.Strategies for Successful Air Injection-Based IOR Processes. Paper 1998.235presented at the 7th UNITAR International Conference on Heavy Oil and TarSands, Beijing, 27-30 October.
Pooladi-Darvish, M. and Farouq Ali, S.M. 1994. Steam Heating of Fractured FormationContaining Heavy Oil: Basic Premises and a Single-Block Analysis. Paper SPE28642 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, NewOrleans, 25-28 September. doi: 10.2118/28642-MS.
Prats, M. 1982. Thermal Recovery. Monograph Series, SPE, Richardson,Texas 7.
Ramey, H.J. Jr., Stamp, V.W., Pebdani, F.N., and Mallinson, J.E. 1992. Case History of South Belridge,California, In-Situ Combustion Oil Recovery. Paper SPE 24200 presented atthe SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22-24 April. doi:10.2118/24200-MS.
Sarathi, P.S. 1999. In-Situ Combustion Handbook--Principles and Practices.Technical Report, DOE/PC/91008-0374, OSTI ID 3175, National PetroleumTechnology Office, US DOE, Tulsa, Oklahoma (January 1999).
Sarkar, A.K. and Sarathi, P.S. 1993. Thermal processes for heavy oilrecovery. Technical Report No. NIPER-722, Contract No. FC22-83FE60149, NationalInstitute for Petroleum and Energy Research, Bartlesville, Oklahoma (01November 1993).
Schulte, W.M. and de Vries, A.S. 1985. In-Situ Combustion in NaturallyFractured Heavy Oil Reservoirs. SPE J. 25 (1): 67-77.SPE-10723-PA. doi: 10.2118/10723-PA.
STARS User Guide. 2006. Calgary, Alberta: Computer Modelling Group(CMG).
Tabasinejad, F., Karrat, R., and Vossoughi, S. 2006. Feasibility Study of In-situCombustion in Naturally Fractured Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper SPE 103969presented at the First International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico,Cancun, Mexico, 31 August-2 September. doi: 10.2118/103969-MS.
Xia, T. X., Greaves, M., and Turta, A. 2005. Main Mechanism for Stability ofTHAI-Toe-to-Heel Air Injection. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 44 (1):42-48.
Xia, T.X. and Greaves, M. 2001. Down hole Upgrading Athabasca TarSand Bitumen Using THAI-SARA Analysis. Paper SPE 69693 presented at the SPEInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Sumposium, Porlamar, MargaritaIsland, Venezuela, 12-14 March. doi: 10.2118/69693-MS.
Xu, H.H., Okazawa, N.E., Moore, R.G, Laureshen, C.J., Ursenbach, J., andMallory, D.H. 2001. In-Situ Upgrading of Heavy Oils. J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 40 (8).