A Mixing Rule of Self-Diffusivities in Methane Hydrocarbon Mixtures and the Determination of GOR and Oil Viscosities from NMR Log Data
- Jiansheng Chen (Baker Hughes) | Songhua Chen (Baker Hughes)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 275 - 282
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.2.3 Rock properties, 4.6 Natural Gas, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.5.11 Formation Testing (e.g., Wireline, LWD), 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation
- self-diffusivity, GOR, mixing rule, oil viscosity, NMR
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 680 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
A new mixing rule is described for the prediction of the self diffusivities of gas- and liquid-hydrocarbon molecules in methane/oil mixtures. Unlike macroscopic fluid properties, such as density and viscosity, molecular self diffusivity is a microscopic parameter associated with individual molecular species. Thus, a self diffusivity of a binary mixture of gas and oil is a misnomer. Instead, the self diffusivity of each species in the binary system is affected by the presence of the other species. For that reason, the commonly used log-mean based mixing rule that applies to macroscopic properties of the mixtures is unsuitable for self diffusivity when the reference states are pure Components 1 and 2. We found that it is necessary to introduce two new reference states: One is the infinite dilution of Component 1 in Component 2; the other is the infinite dilution of Component 2 in Component 1. The component can be a single-molecule species or a mixture, as long as its self diffusivity or self diffusivity distribution can be measured. Using this approach, the self diffusivity of each component in the mixture follows the log-mean based mixing rule. This new mixing rule is verified with literature data of methane/hexane, ethane/hexane, methane/octane, ethane/octane, methane/decane, and ethane/decane mixtures over a wide range of temperatures, pressures, and solution-gas concentrations.
The new mixing rule is applied, and a detailed procedure is developed, to determine the gas/oil ratio (GOR) and the live-oil viscosity for in-situ volatile oils from nuclear-magnetic-resonance (NMR) log data. First, the self diffusivities and proton fraction of the methane and oil mixture are determined by fitting the NMR-measured diffusivity distribution with a bimodal distribution. Then, the self diffusivities for the four reference states are calculated using the mixing rule. Finally, the GOR is calculated from the proton ratio, while the live-oil viscosity is calculated from the self diffusivity of pure oil and the GOR. The calculated GOR and oil viscosities are compared to the pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) measurement of the oil sample taken from downhole and show good agreement. GOR and oil viscosities from this new technique can be used for optimizing testing and sampling programs, for reservoir-simulation studies, and for the design of surface production facilities.
|File Size||552 KB||Number of Pages||8|
Adamson, A.W. 1960. The Diffusional Behavior and Viscosity of LiquidMixtures. Trans., AIME, 219: 158-165.
Akinsanmi, O., Draup, A., Chen, J., Ong, W., and Gillen, M. 2006.Identification of gas, gas condensate, formation oil, and OBMF in thin-bedturbidite environment using 2-Dimensional NMR interpretation techniques.Presented at the 12th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan, Chiba, Japan,4-5 October.
Beggs, H.D. and Robinson, J.R. 1975. Estimating the Viscosity of Crude OilSystems. J. Pet Tech 27 (9): 1140-1141. SPE-5434-PA.doi: 10.2118/5434-PA.
Carr, H.Y. and Purcell, E.M. 1954. Effects of Diffusion on FreePrecession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Phys. Rev. 94(3): 630-638. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.630.
Chen, S., Beard, D.C., Gillen, M., Fang, S., and Zhang, G. 2002. NR explorerlog acquisition methods: Petrophysical-objective-oriented approach. Presentedat the 44th SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Galveston, Texas, USA, 22-25June.
Dawson, R., Khoury, F., and Kobayashi, R. 1970. Self diffusion measurements inmethane by pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance. AIChE Journal 16 (5): 725-729. doi:10.1002/aic.690160507.
Di Rosa, D., Gyllensten, A., Chen, S., Li, W., Georgi, D., and Tauk, R.2008. Use of the NMR DiffusivityLog To Identify and Quantify Oil and Water in Carbonate Formations. SPERes Eval & Eng 11 (2): 238-245. SPE-101396-PA. doi:10.2118/101396-PA.
Fong, W.S., Sandler, S.I., and Emanuel, A.S. 1996. A Simple Predictive Calculation forthe Viscosity of Liquid Phase Reservoir Fluids With High Accuracy for CO2Mixtures. SPE J. 1 (3): 243-250. SPE-26645-PA. doi:10.2118/26645-PA.
Freed, D.E., Burcaw, L., and Song, Y.-Q. 2005. Scaling Laws forDiffusion Coefficients in Mixtures of Alkanes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (6): 064501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.067602.
Greiner-Schmid, A., Wappmann, S., Has, M., and Lüdemann, H.-D. 1991. Self-diffusion in the compressedfluid lower alkanes: Methane, ethane, and propane. J. Chem. Phys. 94 (8): 5643. doi:10.1063/1.460474.
Harris, K.R. 1978. The density dependence ofthe self-diffusion coefficient of methane at -50º, 25º, and 50º. PhysicaA: Statistical and Theoretical Physics 94 (3-4): 448-464.doi:10.1016/0378-4371(78)90078-X.
Harris, K.R. and Trappeniers, N.J. 1980. The density dependence ofthe self-diffusion coefficient of liquid methane. Physica A: Statisticaland Theoretical Physics 104 (1-2): 262-280.doi:10.1016/0378-4371(80)90087-4.
Helbæk, M., Hafskjold, B., Dysthe, D.K., and Sørland, G.H. 1996. Self-Diffusion Coefficients ofMethane or Ethane Mixtures with Hydrocarbons at High Pressure by NMR. J.Chem. Eng. Data 41 (3): 598-603. doi:10.1021/je950293p.
Lederer, E.L. 1933. Proceedings of the First World PetroleumCongress, Vol. 2, 526-528. London: World Petroleum Council.
Liu, K. 1999. Fully AutomaticProcedure for Efficient Reservoir Fluid Characterization. Paper SPE 56744presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6October. doi: 10.2118/56744-MS.
Lo, S.-W., Hirasaki, G.J., House, W.V., and Kobayashi, R. 2002. Mixing Rules and Correlations of NMRRelaxation Time With Viscosity, Diffusivity, and Gas/Oil Ratio ofMethane/Hydrocarbon Mixtures. SPE J. 7 (1): 24-34.SPE-77264-PA. doi: 10.2118/77264-PA.
McCain, W.D. Jr. 1990. The Properties of Petroleum Fluids, secondedition. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell Publishing Company.
McConnell, J. 1987. The Theory of Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation inLiquids. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oosting, P.H. and Trappeniers, N.J. 1970. Proton-spin-latticerelaxation and self-diffusion in methanes: IV. Self-diffusion in methane.Physica 51 (3): 418-431.doi:10.1016/0031-8914(71)90050-4.
Speight, J.G. 2006. The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, fourthedition. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Tanner, J.E. and Stejskal, E.O. 1968. Restricted Self-Diffusion of Protonsin Colloidal Systems by the Pulsed-Gradient, Spin-Echo Method. J. Chem.Phys. 49 (4): 1768. doi:10.1063/1.1670306.
Todd, M.R. and Longstaff, W.J. 1972. The Development, Testing, andApplication of a Numerical Simulator for Predicting Miscible FloodPerformance. J. Pet Tech 24 (7): 874-882;Trans., AIME, 253. SPE-3484-PA. doi: 10.2118/3484-PA.