Continuous Improvement in Slop-Mud Treatment Technology
- Karen L.J. McCosh (M-I SWACO) | Mukesh Kapila (M-I SWACO) | Rahul Dixit (M-I SWACO) | Paul W. Way (Schlumberger) | Jonathan Phipps (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- September 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 418 - 423
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.11.2 Drilling Fluid Selection and Formulation (Chemistry, Properties), 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3.2.6 Produced Water Management, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.3.4 Scale, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 2 Well Completion, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 702 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Oil-based drilling fluids can become contaminated with significant quantities of water as a result of low efficiency well-bore displacements to water or brine and from operations such as rig and pit cleaning. The presence of excess emulsifiers and oil-wet solids in typical oil-based drilling fluids allows large quantities of water to be emulsified. These oil-continuous emulsions are often termed slop muds.
This paper presents a process for separating and recycling slop muds in a continuous process. Analytical data on the effects of water contamination on oil-based mud, the resultant slop-mud structure, the influence of shear, and quantification of the critical factors controlling phase-separation and chemical dose will be presented. In addition, treatment of the slop-mud on a continuous basis will be demonstrated both on the laboratory and full-scale defining the important process parameters, such as mixing energy, phase recovery rate, recovered drilling fluid properties, and treated water properties.
Development of an understanding of the slop-mud stream enabled a novel continuous treatment system to be built that provides efficient and fast phase-separation with recovery of the valuable drilling fluid phase, with significant advantages over current batch-type systems. The process requires in-line injection and mixing of surfactant into the slop mud, then continuous separation of the waste into water and drilling fluid using a gravity separator. The drilling fluid remains as a water-in-oil emulsion containing solids and other chemical additives, which can be reconditioned to acceptable properties for reuse. The water recovery rates are typically 70 to 90 vol% of the total water present in the slop mud. This recovered water is treated using centrifugation, filtration or other water-treatment techniques to meet or exceed discharge consent limits of 15 mg/L total petroleum hydrocarbon. Water collected in the rig deck-drain system that may also be contaminated with oil or oil-based mud can also be treated in the same manner as the recovered slop water.
Because the process allows continuous treatment of the slop-mud stream, the resultant equipment has significant benefits over the current batch-type systems, including higher throughput and decreased footprint.
|File Size||464 KB||Number of Pages||6|
API RP 13B-2, Recommended Practice for Field Testing Oil-Based DrillingFluids, fourth edition. 2005. Washington, DC: API.
Bansbach, P.L. 1970. The How and Why of Emulsions. Oil & GasJournal 68 (36): 87-93.
Beetge, J.H. and Horne, B.O. 2008. Chemical-Demulsifier DevelopmentBased on Critical-Electric-Field Measurements. SPE J.13 (3): 346-353. SPE-93325-PA. doi: 10.2118/93325-PA.
Boysen, R.E., Alexander, K.L., and McCandless, R.R. 2007. MembraneFiltration: An Emerging Tool for Produced Water Management. Presented at the14th International Petroleum Environmental Conference, Houston, 6-9November.
Darley, H.C.H. and Gray, G.R. 1988. Composition and Properties ofDrilling and Completion Fluids, fifth edition. Houston, Texas: GulfPublishing Company.
Eia, J.T. and Hernandez, E. 2006. Environmental Advances in DrillingFluids and Waste Operations Applying Novel Technology for Fluid Recovery andRecycling. Paper SPE 102737 presented at the SPE Russian Oil and GasTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, 3-6 October. doi:10.2118/102737-MS.
Herzhaft, B., Rousseau, L., Neau, L., Moan, M., and Bossard, F. 2002. Influence of Temperature andClays/Emulsion Microstructure on Oil-Based Mud Low Shear Rate Rheology.Paper SPE 77818 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2 October.doi:10.2118/77818-MS.
Ivan, C. and Dixit, R. 2006. Drilling Slop Water Reclamation. PaperAADE-06-DF-HO-19 presented at the AADE 2006 Fluids Conference, Houston, 11-12April.
Juliussen, T. 2007. Epcon CFU--An Alternative Technology to TraditionalProduced Water Treatment. Presented at the 14th International PetroleumEnvironmental Conference, Houston, 6-9 November.
Robinson, J. and Veil, J. 2007. An Overview of Offshore and Onshore ProducedWater Treatment Technologies. Presented at the 14th International PetroleumEnvironmental Conference, Houston, 6-9 November.