A New Azimuthal Deep-Reading Resistivity Tool for Geosteering and Advanced Formation Evaluation
- Michael S. Bittar (Halliburton Energy Services) | James D. Klein (ConocoPhillips) | Beste Randy (Halliburton Energy Services) | Guoyu Hu (Halliburton Energy Services) | Min Wu (Halliburton Energy Services) | Jason L. Pitcher (Halliburton Energy Services) | Chris Golla (Halliburton Energy Services) | Gary D. Althoff (Halliburton Energy Services) | Mark Sitka (Halliburton Energy Services) | Vadim Minosyan (Halliburton Energy Services) | Martin D. Paulk (Halliburton Energy Services)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 270 - 279
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 1,417 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Drilling services and oil companies have long been interested in acquiring the capability of landing a well accurately in a hydrocarbon reservoir and remaining in it for optimal drainage. Although traditional logging-while-drilling (LWD) propagation resistivity tools can help to achieve this goal, their overall effectiveness is not satisfactory because they lack azimuthal sensitivity. Ideally, geosteering and advanced formation-evaluation methods, such as anisotropy calculations, require azimuthally sensitive measurements.
This paper discusses a newly developed propagation resistivity tool that is designed to be azimuthally sensitive for use in geosteering and formation evaluation while drilling. It uses the tilted-antenna concept to produce directionally sensitive measurements that are lacking in traditional LWD propagation tools. This paper also discusses the theory and the development of this tool, as well as the experimentation and numerical-modeling data used to characterize its azimuthal capability. Advanced application algorithms used to calculate the horizontal and the vertical resistivity (anisotropy calculation), as well as dipping angle, will be explained in detail. Finally, the paper presents and discusses field examples to demonstrate that this newly developed tool is a two-in-one service: geosteering and advanced formation evaluation.
The azimuthal deep-reading resistivity is shown to bear promise for use in optimization of well trajectory and well placement and in advanced formation evaluation while drilling. This newly developed tool is superior to traditional propagation tools in locating bed boundaries and in keeping the well in the desired pay zone. In addition to providing traditional multiple-depth-of-investigation resistivity measurements, this new tool provides multiple-depth-of-investigation azimuthal resistivity measurements.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Barber, T., Anderson, B., Abubakar, A., Broussard, T., Chen, K.-C.,Davydycheva, S., Druskin, V. et al. 2004. Determining Formation ResistivityAnisotropy in the Presence of Invasion. Paper SPE 90526 presented at theSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. DOI:10.2118/90526-MS.
Bell, C., Hampson, J., Eadsforth, P., Chernali, R., Helgesen, T., Meyer, H.,Peveto, C. et al. 2006. Navigating and Imaging in ComplexGeology With Azimuthal Propagation Resistivity While Drilling. Paper SPE102637 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SanAntonio, Texas, USA, 24-7 September. DOI: 10.2118/102637-MS.
Bittar , M. 2000. Electromagnetic wave resistivity tool having a tiltedantenna for determining the horizontal and vertical resistivities and relativedip angle in anisotropic earth formations. US Patent No. 6,163,155.
Bittar , M. 2002. Electromagnetic wave resistivity tool having a tiltedantenna for geosteering within a desired payzone. US Patent No. 6,476,609.
Bittar, M.S. and Rodney, P.F. 1994. The effects of rock anisotropy on MWDelectromagnetic wave resistivity sensors. Paper PP presented at the SPWLAAnnual Logging Symposium, 19-22 June.
Bittar, M.S., Rodney, P.F., Mack, S.G., and Bartel, R.P. 1993. A Multiple-Depth-of-InvestigationElectromagnetic Wave Resistivity Sensor: Theory, Experiment, and FieldTest. SPE Form Eval 8 (3): 171-176. SPE-22705-PA. DOI:10.2118/22705-PA.
Clark, B., Lüling, M.G., Jundt, J., Ross, M., and Best, D. 1988. A dualdepth resistivity measurement for FEWD. Paper A presented at the SPWLA AnnualLogging Symposium, 5-8 June.
Li, Q., Omeragic D., Chou L., Yang L., Duong K., Smits J., Yang, J. et al.2005. New directional electromagnetic tool for proactive geosteering andaccurate formation evaluation while drilling. Paper UU presented at the SPWLAAnnual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, 26-29 June.
Meyer, W.H. 1995. New two frequency propagation resistivity tools. Paper XXpresented at the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Paris, 16-19 June.
Rodney, P.F. and Wisler, M.M. 1986. Electromagnetic Wave Resistivity MWDTool. SPE Drill Eng 1 (5): 337-346; Trans.,AIME, 281. SPE-12167-PA. DOI: 10.2118/12167-PA.