A Critical Review for Proper Use of Water/Oil/Gas Transfer Functions in Dual-Porosity Naturally Fractured Reservoirs: Part I
- Benjamin Ramirez (Marathon Oil Co.) | Hossein Kazemi (Colorado School of Mines) | Mohammed Al-kobaisi (Colorado School of Mines) | Erdal Ozkan (Colorado School of Mines) | Safian Atan (Marathon Oil Co.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- April 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 200 - 210
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 1,583 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Accurate calculation of multiphase-fluid transfer between the fracture and matrix in naturally fractured reservoirs is a crucial issue. In this paper, we will present the viability of the use of simple transfer functions to account accurately for fluid exchange resulting from capillary, gravity, and diffusion mass transfer for immiscible flow between fracture and matrix in dual-porosity numerical models. The transfer functions are designed for sugar-cube or match-stick idealizations of matrix blocks.
The study relies on numerical experiments involving fine-grid simulation of oil recovery from a typical matrix block by water or gas in an adjacent fracture. The fine-grid results for water/oil and gas/oil systems were compared with results obtained with transfer functions. In both water and gas injection, the simulations emphasize the interaction of capillary and gravity forces to produce oil, depending on the wettability of the matrix.
In gas injection, the thermodynamic phase equilibrium, aided by gravity/capillary interaction and, to a lesser extent, by molecular diffusion, is a major contributor to interphase mass transfer. For miscible flow, the fracture/matrix mass transfer is less complicated because there are no capillary forces associated with solvent and oil; nevertheless, gravity contrast between solvent in the fracture and oil in the matrix creates convective mass transfer and drainage of oil.
Using the transfer functions presented in this paper, fracture- and matrix-flow calculations can be decoupled and solved sequentially--reducing the complexity of the computation. Furthermore, the transfer-function equations can be used independently to calculate oil recovery from a matrix block.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Acs, G., Doleschall, S., and Farkas, E. 1985. General Purpose CompositionalModel. SPE J. 25 (4) 543-553. SPE-10515-PA. DOI:10.2118/10515-PA.
Al-Kandari, H.A. 2002. Numerical simulation of gas-oil gravity drainage forcentrifuge experiments and scaled reservoir matrix blocks. PhD dissertation,Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
Al-Kandari, H.A., Kazemi, H., and Van Kirk, C.W. 2002. Gas InjectionEnhanced Oil Recovery in High Relief Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Presentedat the Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City,State of Kuwait, 14-16 December.
Al-Kobaisi, M., Kazemi, H., Ramirez, B., Ozkan, E., and Atan, S. 2009. A Critical Review for Proper Use ofWater/Oil/Gas Transfer Functions in Dual-Porosity Naturally FracturedReservoirs: Part II. SPE Res Eval & Eng 12 (2):XX-SS. SPE-11778-PA. DOI: 10.2523/11778-MS.
Balogun, A., Kazemi, H., Ozkan, E., Al-Kobaisi, A., and Ramirez, B. 2007. Verification and Proper Use ofWater/Oil Transfer Function for Dual-Porosity and Dual-PermeabilityReservoirs. Paper SPE 104580 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and GasShow and Conference, Kingdom of Bahrain, 11-14 March. DOI:10.2118/104580-MS.
Barenblatt, G.I., Zheltov, I.P., and Kochina, I.N. 1960. Basic concepts in thetheory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks. J. ofApplied Mathematics and Mechanics 24 (5): 1286-1303.DOI:10.1016/0021-8928(60)90107-6.
Beliveau, D. 1989. PressureTransients Characterize Fractured Midale Unit. J. Pet Tech41 (12): 1354-1362; Trans., AIME, 287. SPE-15635-PA.DOI: 10.2118/15635-PA.
Blair, P.M. 1964. Calculation ofOil Displacement by Countercurrent Water Imbibition. SPE J.4 (3): 195-202; Trans., AIME, 231. SPE-873-PA. DOI:10.2118/873-PA.
Chang, M.-M. 1993. NIPER-696:Deriving the shape factor of a fractured rock matrix. Technical report,Contract No. DE93000170, US DOE, Washington, DC (September 1993). DOI:10.2172/10192737.
Civan, F. and Rasmussen, M.L. 2002. Analytical Hindered-Matrix-FractureTransfer Models for Naturally Fractured Petroleum Reservoirs. Paper SPE74364 presented at the SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition inMexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 10-12 February. DOI: 10.2118/74364-MS.
Fung, L.S.K. 1991. Simulationof Block-to-Block Processes in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPE ResEng 6 (4): 477-484. SPE-20019-PA. DOI: 10.2118/20019-PA.
Gilman, J.R. 1986. An EfficientFinite-Difference Method for Simulating Phase Segregation in the Matrix Blocksin Double-Porosity Reservoirs. SPE Res Eng 1 (4):403-413; Trans., AIME, 281. SPE-12271-PA. DOI: 10.2118/12271-PA.
Gilman, J.R. 2003. Practical aspects of simulation of fractured reservoirs.Presented at the International Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Buhl,Baden-Baden, Germany, 23-27 June.
Gilman, J.R. and Kazemi, H. 1988. Improved Calculations for Viscous andGravity Displacement in Matrix Blocks in Dual-Porosity Simulators. J.Pet Tech 40 (1): 60-70; Trans., AIME, 285.SPE-16010-PA. DOI: 10.2118/16010-PA.
Hagoort, J. 1980. Oil Recoveryby Gravity Drainage. SPE J. 20 (3): 139-150.SPE-7424-PA. DOI: 10.2118/7424-PA.
Heinemann, Z.E. and Mittermeir, M.G. 2006. Rigorous derivation of theKazemi-Gilman-Elsharkawy generalized dual-porosity shape factor. Paper B044presented at the European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery,Amsterdam, 4-7 September.
Horie, T., Firoozabadi, A., and Ishimoto, K. 1990. Laboratory Studies of CapillaryInteraction in Fracture/Matrix Systems. SPE Res Eng 5(3): 353-360. SPE-18282-PA. DOI: 10.2118/18282-PA.
Hoteit, H. and Firoozabadi, A. 2006. Numerical Modeling of Diffusion inFractured Media for Gas Injection and Recycling Schemes. Paper SPE 103292presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,Texas, USA, 24-27 September. DOI: 10.2118/103292-MS.
Iffly, R., Rousselet, D.C., and Vermeulen, J. L. 1972. Fundamental Study of Imbibition inFissured Oil Fields. Paper SPE 4102 presented at the SPE Annual Meeting,San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8-11 October. DOI: 10.2118/4102-MS.
Kazemi, H. and Gilman, J.R. 1993. Multiphase flow in fractured petroleumreservoirs. In Flow and Contaminant Transport in Fractured Rock, ed. J.Bear, C.-F. Tsang, G. de Marsily, 267-323. San Diego, California: AcademicPress.
Kazemi, H., Merrill, J.R., Porterfield, K.L., and Zeman, P.R. 1976. Numerical Simulation of Water-Oil Flowin Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPE J. 16 (6):317-326; Trans., AIME, 261. SPE-5719-PA. DOI:10.2118/5719-PA.
Kleppe, J. and Morse, R.A. 1974. Oil Production From FracturedReservoirs by Water Displacement. Paper SPE 5084 presented at the SPEMeeting, Houston, 6-9 October. DOI: 10.2118/5084-MS.
Kyte, J.R. 1970. A CentrifugeMethod To Predict Matrix-Block Recovery in Fractured Reservoirs. SPEJ. 10 (2): 161-170; Trans., AIME, 249.SPE-2729-PA. DOI: 10.2118/2729-PA.
Lim, K.T. and Aziz, K. 1995. Matrix-fracture transferfunctions for dual porosity simulators. J. Pet. Sci. Eng.13 (3-4): 169-178. DOI: 10.1016/0920-4105(95)00010-F.
Litvak, B.L. 1985. Simulation and characterization of naturally fracturedreservoirs. Proc., Reservoir Characterization Technical Conference,Dallas, 561-583.
Lu, H., Di Donato, G., and Blunt, M.J. 2006. General Transfer Functions forMulti-Phase Flow. Paper SPE 102542 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September. DOI:10.2118/102542-MS.
Mattax, C.C. and Kyte, J.R. 1962. Imbibition Oil Recovery From Fractured,Water-Drive Reservoir. SPE J. 2 (2): 177-184;Trans., AIME, 225. SPE-187-PA. DOI: 10.2118/187-PA.
Rangel-German, E.R. and Kovscek, A.R. 2003. Time-Dependent Matrix-Fracture ShapeFactors for Partially and Completely Immersed Fractures. Paper SPE 84411presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8October. DOI: 10.2118/84411-MS.
Saidi, A.M. 1983. Simulation ofNaturally Fractured Reservoirs. Paper SPE 12270 presented at the SPEReservoir Simulation Symposium, San Francisco, 15-18 November. DOI:10.2118/12270-MS.
Sonier, F., Souillard, P., and Blaskovich, F.T. 1988. Numerical Simulation of NaturallyFractured Reservoirs. SPE Res Eng 3 (4): 1114-1122;Trans., AIME, 285. SPE-15627-PA. DOI: 10.2118/15627-PA.
Uleberg, K. and Kleppe, J. 1996. Dual porosity, dual permeabilityformulation for fractured reservoir simulation. Presented at the NorwegianUniversity of Science and Technology, Trondheim RUTH Seminar, Stavanger.
Warren, J.E. and Root, P.J. 1963. The Behavior of Naturally FracturedReservoirs. SPE J. 3 (3): 245-255; Trans., AIME,228. SPE-426-PA. DOI: 10.2118/426-PA.
Watts, J.W. 1986. ACompositional Formulation of the Pressure and Saturation Equations. SPERes Eng 1 (3): 243-252; Trans., AIME, 281.SPE-12244-PA. DOI: 10.2118/12244-PA.
Wong, T.W., Firoozabadi, A., and Aziz, K. 1990. Relationship of the Volume-Balance Method of Compositional Simulationto the Newton-Raphson Method. Paper SPE 21462 (supplement to paper SPE18424) available from SPE, Richardson, Texas.
Yamamoto, R.H., Padgett, J.B., Ford, W.T., and Boubeguira, A. 1971. Compositional Reservoir Simulation forFissured Systems--The Single-Block Model. SPE J. 11(2): 113-128. SPE-2666-PA. DOI: 10.2118/2666-PA.
Zhang, X., Morrow, N.R., and Ma, S. 1996. Experimental Verification of aModified Scaling Group for Spontaneous Imbibition. SPE Res Eng11 (4): 280-285. SPE-30762-PA. DOI: 10.2118/30762-PA.