Olefin-Based Synthetic-Drilling-Fluids Volumetric Behavior Under Downhole Conditions
- Barkim Demirdal (Marquis Fluids) | Jose C. Cunha (Petrobras America)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 239 - 248
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 1.7.5 Well Control, 1.8 Formation Damage, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 1.11.2 Drilling Fluid Selection and Formulation (Chemistry, Properties), 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.7.2 Managed Pressure Drilling, 1.7.1 Underbalanced Drilling, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- volumetric, managed pressure drilling, drilling fluids, synthetic, downhole conditions
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 1,141 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Usual practice in drilling engineering is to determine drilling-fluid density at surface conditions assuming that drilling-fluid density does not change with changing downhole conditions. This assumption may result in inaccuracy while estimating static and dynamic pressures in the wellbore, especially when synthetic-based drilling fluids are used. Inaccurate estimation of the pressure profile in the annulus can lead to severe well problems such as kicks, drilling-fluid losses, and wellbore instability. In addition, inaccurate pressure-profile estimation can affect the success of managed-pressure-drilling (MPD) operations, which require real-time knowledge of wellbore pressures to keep wellbore pressure between formation pore and fracture pressures using a control choke placed on the return line of the annulus.
Effects of pressure and temperature on volumetric behavior of two olefin-based synthetic oils are investigated in this study using a mercury-free pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) system. The olefin-based synthetic oils used in this study are C16C18 internal olefin (IO) and C12C14 linear alpha olefin (LAO). To simulate deep offshore situations, the temperature is ranged between 25 and 175°C, while the pressure is ranged between 0 and 14,000 psig.
In addition, volumetric performances of olefin-based synthetic-oil systems under investigation are compared with those of water, brine solution, mineral oil, diesel oil, and n-paraffin-based oil under similar conditions.
The study shows that the volumetric properties of synthetic-based oils are more sensitive to pressure and temperature conditions compared to water, brine solutions, mineral oil, and diesel oil. Once emulsion systems containing synthetic-based oils are used, density change with respect to downhole conditions should be modeled to increase the reliability of pressure-profile calculations.
|File Size||808 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Demirdal, B. 2001. The Study of Flow of Paraffin Based Synthetic DrillingFluid at Elevated Pressure and Elevated Temperature (EPET) Conditions. MScthesis, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Demirdal, B., Miska, S., Takach, N., and Cunha, J.C. 2007. Drilling Fluids Rheological andVolumetric Characterization Under Downhole Conditions. Paper SPE 108111presented at the Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference,Buenos Aires, 15-18 April. doi: 10.2118/108111-MS.
Grigull, U., Straub, J., and Schiebener, P. ed. 1990. Steam tables inSI-units: concise steam tables in SI-units (student's tables). Properties ofordinary water substance up to 1000 °C and 100 megapascal = Wasserdampftafeln :Kurzgefasste Dampftafeln in SI- Einheiten (Studententafeln) : Zustandsgrössenvon gewöhnlichem Wasser und Dampf bis 1000°C und 1000 bar, third enlargededition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Hemphill, T. and Isambourg, P. 2005. New model predicts oil, synthetic muddensities. Oil and Gas Journal 103 (16): 56-58.
Hoberock, L.L., Thomas, D.C., and Nickens, H.V. 1982a. Bottom-Hole MudPressure Variations Due to Compressibility and Thermal Effects. Paper presentedat the IADC Drilling Technology Conference, Houston, 9-11 March.
Hoberock, L.L., Thomas, D.C., and Nickens, H.V. 1982b. Here's HowCompressibility and Temperature Affect Bottom-Hole Mud Pressure. Oil and GasJournal 80 (3): 159-164.
Isambourg, P., Anfinsen, B.T., and Marken, C. 1996. Volumetric Behavior of Drilling Mudsat High Pressure and High Temperature. Paper SPE 36830 presented at theEuropean Petroleum Conference, Milan, Italy, 22-24 October. doi:10.2118/36830-MS.
Kutasov, I.M. 1988. Empirical Correlation Determines Downhole Mud Density.Oil and Gas Journal 86 (December 12): 61-63.
McMordie, W.C. Jr., Bland, R.G., and Hauser, J.M. 1982. Effect of Temperature and Pressure onthe Density of Drilling Fluids. Paper SPE 11114 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 26-29 September. doi:10.2118/11114-MS.
Methven, N.E. and Baumann, R. 1972. Performance of Oil Muds at HighTemperatures. Paper SPE 3743 presented at the SPE European Spring Meeting,Amsterdam, 16-18 May. doi: 10.2118/3743-MS.
Peters, E.J., Chenevert, M.E., and Zhang, C. 1990. A Model for Predicting the Density ofOil-Base Muds at High Pressures and Temperatures. SPE Drill Eng5 (2): 141-148; Trans., AIME, 289. SPE-18036-PA.doi: 10.2118/18036-PA.
Sorelle, R.R., Jardiolin, R.A., Buckley, P., and Barrios, J.R. 1982. Mathematical Field Model PredictsDownhole Density Changes in Static Drilling Fluids. Paper SPE 11118presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans,26-29 September. doi: 10.2118/11118-MS.