Gauge, Cutting Structure, Torque Control Components--What Really Counts for Optimal Tool Face Control With FC Drill Bits?
- Steven P. Barton (ReedHycalog) | Henry S. May (ReedHycalog) | Simon Johnson (ReedHycalog)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 293 - 300
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6.2 Technical Limit Drilling, 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 1.6.1 Drilling Operation Management, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.5.1 Bit Design, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 1.5 Drill Bits
- depth-of-cut control, torque control, motor steerable, torsional stability, tapered gauge
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,025 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Tool-face control is widely regarded as one of the greatest challenges when drilling directionally with an FC (fixed cutter) drill bit on a positive displacement motor (PDM).
Tool-face offset is proportional to the torque generated by the bit. FC bits, by nature, generate high levels of torque. If an external force acting on the bit causes an FC bit to over-engage, a large change in downhole torque is typically produced, which causes rotation of the drillstring and loss of tool-face orientation. It is therefore desirable for an FC bit to produce a torque response that does not vary greatly with changes in the external forces applied.
This paper examines the effect of varied components of an FC drill bit to determine the key design requirements to deliver a smooth torque response and improved directional performance. This includes evaluation of the results from a comprehensive series of laboratory tests to determine the effectiveness of a number of varied, removable torque controlling components (TCC). The goal was to establish a configuration that would provide predictable torque response to applied weight on bit (WOB), allowing cutting structures to be independently optimized for overall higher penetration rates.
A novel gauge geometry was engineered to reduce drag and deliver a smoother borehole. This would provide less torque when sliding and beneficial gauge pad interaction with the borehole when in rotating mode.
Field performance studies clearly demonstrate that matching TCC, an optimized cutting structure, and gauge geometry to a steerable assembly delivers smooth torque response and improved directional control. Benefits within rotary vertical applications are also demonstrated. Successful application has resulted in significant time and cost savings.
|File Size||950 KB||Number of Pages||8|
Barr, J.D. 1980. Optimisation of Radial Distribution of Stratapax (T1)Cutters in Rock Drilling Bits. Paper presented at the Energy-Sources TechnologyConference, New Orleans, 1 February, ASME Petroleum Division.
Barton, S. 2000. Development ofStable PDC Bits for Specific Use on Rotary Steerable Systems. Paper SPE62779 presented at IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology, Kuala Lumpur,11-13 September. doi: 10.2118/62779-MS.
Barton, S., Carrington, D., Clegg, J., Chia, C., and Garkasi, A. 2007. PDC Bit Designed for High Lateraland Torsional Stability Significantly Improves Rotary Steerable Performance inthe Middle East. Paper SPE 108248 presented at the SPE/IADC Middle EastDrilling and Technology Conference, Cairo, 22-24 October. doi:10.2118/108248-MS.
Barton, S., May, H., and Johnson, S. 2007. Geometry and Placement of TorqueControl Components--How Does This Affect Torque Response With FC Drill Bits?Paper AADE-07-NTCE-07 presented at the 2007 AADE National Technical Conferenceand Exhibition, Houston, 10-12 April.
Clegg, J. and Barton, S. 2006. Improved Optimization of BitSelection Using Mathematically Modeled Bit Performance Indices. Paper SPE102287 presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conferenceand Exhibition, Bangkok, Thailand, 13-15 November. doi: 10.2118/102287-MS.
DeLucia, F.V. 1989. Benefits,Limitations, and Applicability of Steerable System Drilling. Paper SPE18656 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, New Orleans, 28 February-3March. doi: 10.2118/18656-MS.
Fuller, J. 1988. Rotary drill bits. US Patent 4,718,505. granted Jan 12,1988
Henderson, H.I. 1967. Drilling Bit. US Patent No. 3,308,896.
Johnson, S. 2008. A New Methodof Producing Laterally Stable PDC Drill Bits. SPE Drill & Compl23 (3): 314-324. SPE-98986-PA. doi: 10.2118/98986-PA.
Makohl, F. and Jurgens, R. 1986. Evolution and Differences ofDirectional and High-Performance Downhole Motors. Paper SPE 14742 presentedat the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Dallas, 10-12 February. doi:10.2118/14742-MS.
Niznik, M.R., Carson, A.D., Wise, K.J., and Carson, F. 2006. A New Approach to Stick-Slip ManagementIntegrating Bit Design and Rotary Steerable System Characteristics. PaperSPE 98962 presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Miami, Florida, USA,21-23 February. doi: 10.2118/98962.
Roberts, T.S. 1998. Developmentof a New Concept of Steerable PDC Bit for Directional Drilling. Paper SPE39307 presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, 3-6 March. doi:10.2118/39307-MS.
Whitten, R.G. and Petrey, P.A. III. 1989. Unleashing the Power of SteerableSystems. Paper SPE 18655 presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, NewOrleans, 28 February-3 March. doi: 10.2118/18655-MS.