A Practical Iterative Scheme for Coupling Geomechanics With Reservoir Simulation
- Pierre Samier (Total S.A.) | Atef Onaisi (Total S.A.) | Sergio de Gennaro (Total EP UK)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- October 2008
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 892 - 901
- 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir, 5.5.8 History Matching, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 3 Production and Well Operations
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 1,096 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The use of reservoir simulation coupled with geomechanics has been increasing in recent years as its utility in modeling physical phenomena such as compaction, subsidence, induced fracturing, enhancement of natural fractures and/or fault activation, and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) recovery has become apparent. Among different methods investigated by researchers, the iterative explicit method appears to be the preferred method for field-scale simulation.
This method is a loose coupled approach between a reservoir simulator and a geomechanical simulator. At user-defined steps, the fluid pressures are transmitted to the geomechanical tool, which computes the actual stresses and reports the modifications of porosities and permeabilities back to the reservoir simulator.
This paper presents a new iterative scheme that allows any reservoir simulator to be coupled with any nonlinear finite-element-method (FEM) package for the stress analysis without any limitation on the functionality of either simulator. The convergence of this new scheme is discussed, and results are presented for three cases described below.
The first case is a validation case used by other SPE papers. The second case is a synthetic model of a highly compacting reservoir sensitive to water saturation. The third case is a full-field reservoir model.
The importance of geomechanics in problems such as wellbore stability, hydraulic fracturing, and subsidence is well known. In recent years, there has been growing awareness of the importance of the link between fluid flow and geomechanics in the management of stress-sensitive reservoirs (Chen and Teufel 2001; Gutierrez et al. 1994, 1995; Gutierrez and Lewis 1998; Osorio et al. 1999; Settari and Mourits 1998; Somerville and Smart 2000; Stone et al. 2000; Tran et al. 2002). New needs for coupled simulations appear, such as assessing the integrity of the overburden for heavy-oil recovery using thermal mechanisms (e.g., SAGD technique) or for acid-gas injection. Standard reservoir simulation of compaction drive accounts for nonlinear porosity changes determined from uniaxial-strain tests on cores. In many cases, laboratory-derived compressibility must be adjusted to match the contribution of compaction to total hydrocarbon recovery. Geomechanical effects such as stress arching and nonunique stress path are among the causes of discrepancy between laboratory-derived and field compressibility factors. If compressibility varies linearly with the mean reservoir pressure, then predictive reservoir modeling can be achieved without coupling between stress and flow. However, geomechanical effects are rarely linear, for a number of reasons. These include load variations because of modification of pressure, temperature, and saturation; change of the mechanism of production; and progressive activation of faults, and fractures that affect mechanisms such as stress arching and a nonlinear stress path. Unlike standard compaction-drive simulation, there is no simple linear method to account for the effects of stress on permeability, especially for fractured systems, in which the changes of permeability might be directional, localized, and strongly nonlinear.
There are several ways to achieve the coupling between flow and stress (Charlier et al. 2002; Samier et al. 2006; Yale 2002; Chen and Teufel 2000; Koutsabeloulis and Hope 1998; Lewis and Ghafouri 1997; Settari and Walters 1999; Mainguy and Longuemare 2002; Dean et al. 2006; Gutierrez and Lewis 1998; Thomas et al. 2002). The most rigorous coupling is achieved with fully coupled simulators, which not only solve the flow and the mechanical equations simultaneously but also allow for anisotropy and nonlinearity of the rock constitutive model. The feasibility and accuracy of such simulators, as far as complex and large-scale reservoir systems are concerned, have yet to be proved. Partial coupling on the other hand consists of linking a flow simulator with a stress simulator, allowing a good compromise between feasibility and accuracy. A one-way link from flow to stress simulator is often used for subsidence forecasts. However, to solve the compaction-drive problem, one-way coupling is not sufficient. To ensure the compatibility of pore-volume calculations from the flow and the stress simulators, iterations must be performed within each stress-analysis step before proceeding to the next stress step with or without permeability changes.
|File Size||8 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, 106-111, 161-166.Oxford, UK: Environmental Science Series, Elsevier.
Charlier, R., Fourmaintraux, D., Samier, P., Radu, J.-P., and Guiducci, C.2002. Numerical Simulation of theCoupled Behavior of Faults During the Depletion of aHigh-Pressure/High-Temperature Reservoir. Paper SPE 78199 presented at theSPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, USA, 20-23 October. DOI:10.2118/78199-MS.
Chen, H-Y. and Teufel, L.W. 2000. Coupling Fluid-Flow and Geomechanicsin Dual-Porosity Modeling of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs—Model Descriptionand Comparison. Paper SPE 59043 presented at the SPE InternationalPetroleum Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 1-3February. DOI: 10.2118/59043-MS.
Chen, H-Y. and Teufel, L.W. 2001. Reservoir Stress Changes Induced byProduction/Injection. Paper SPE 71087 presented at the SPE Rocky MountainPetroleum Technology Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 21-23 May. DOI:10.2118/71087-MS.
Dean, R.H., Gai, X., Stone, C.M., and Minkoff, S.E. 2006. A Comparison of Techniques forCoupling Porous Flow and Geomechanics. SPEJ 11 (1): 132-140.SPE-79709-PA. DOI: 10.2118/79709-PA.
Dormieux, L., Mata, C., and Sarda, J.-P. 2000. Mechanical modelling ofchalk/water interaction: Micromechanical and macroscopic approaches. Paperpresented at the Symposium on Mathematical Models in Soil Mechanics, Scilla,Italy, 19-22 September.
Gutierrez, M. and Lewis, R.W. 1998. The Role of Geomechanics in ReservoirSimulation. Paper SPE 47392 presented at SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics inPetroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 8-10 July. DOI: 10.2118/47392-MS.
Gutierrez, M., Makurat, A., and Cuisiat, F. 1995. Coupled HTM Modelling ofFractured Hydrocarbon Reservoirs During Cold Water Injection. Proc., 8thInternational Congress on Rock Mechanics, Tokyo, Vol. 3, 1387-1390.
Gutierrez, M., Tunbridge, L., Hansteen, H., Makurat, A., Barton, N., andLanda, G.H. 1994. Modelling of the compaction behaviour of fractured chalk.Proc., Eurock94, Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Delft, TheNetherlands, 803-810.
Jin, M., Somerville, J., and Smart, B.G.D. 2000. Coupled Reservoir Simulation Appliedto the Management of Production Induced Stress-Sensitivity. Paper SPE 64790presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China,Beijing, 7-10 November. DOI: 10.2118/64790-MS.
Koutsabeloulis, N.C. and Hope, S.A. 1998. "Coupled"Stress/Fluid/Thermal Multi-Phase Reservoir Simulation Studies IncorporatingRock Mechanics. Paper SPE 47393 presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics inPetroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 8-10 July. DOI: 10.2118/47393-MS.
Lewis, R.W. and Ghafouri, H.R. 1997. A novel finite element double porosity model for multiphase flow throughdeformable fractured porous media. International J. for Numerical andAnalytical Methods in Geomechanics 21 (11): 789-816. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199711)21:11<789::AID-NAG901>3.0.CO;2-C.
Mainguy, M. and Longuemare, P. 2002. Coupling fluid flow and rockmechanics: Formulation of the partial coupling between reservoir andgeomechanical simulators. Oil & Gas Science and Technology—Rev.IFP 57 (4): 355-367. DOI: 10.2516/ogst:2002023.
Osorio, J.G., Chen, H-Y., and Teufel, L.W. 1999. Numerical Simulation of the Impact ofFlow-Induced Geomechanical Response on the Productivity of Stress-SensitiveReservoirs. Paper SPE 51929 presented at the SPE Reservoir SimulationSymposium, Houston, 14-17 February. DOI: 10.2118/51929-MS.
Samier, P., Onaisi, A., and Fontaine, G. 2006. Comparisons of Uncoupled and VariousCoupling Techniques for Practical Field Examples. SPEJ 11(1): 89-102. SPE-79698-PA. DOI: 10.2118/79698-PA.
Schroeder, C., Bois, A-P., Maury, V., and Halle, G. 1998. Water/Chalk (or Collapsible Soil)Interaction: Part II. Results of Tests Performed in Laboratory on Lixhe Chalkto Calibrate Water/Chalk Models. Paper SPE 47587 presented at SPE/ISRM RockMechanics in Petroleum Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 8-10 July. DOI:10.2118/47587-MS.
Settari, A. and Mouritis, F.M. 1998. A Coupled Reservoir and GeomechanicalSimulation System. SPEJ 3 (3): 219-226. SPE-50939-PA. DOI:10.2118/50939-PA.
Settari, A. and Walters, D.A. 1999. Advances in Coupled Geomechanical andReservoir Modeling With Applications to Reservoir Compaction. Paper SPE51927 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 14-17February. DOI: 10.2118/51927-MS.
Stone, T., Bowen, G., Papanastasiou, P., and Fuller, J. 2000. Fully Coupled Geomechanics in aCommercial Reservoir Simulator. Paper SPE 65107 presented at the SPEEuropean Petroleum Conference, Paris, 24-25 October. DOI: 10.2118/65107-MS.
Thomas, L.K., Chin L.Y., Pierson, R.G., and Sylte, J.E. 2002. Coupled Geomechanics and ReservoirSimulation. Paper SPE 77723 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2 October.DOI: 10.2118/77723-MS.
Tran, D., Settari, A., Nghiem, L. 2002. New Iterative Coupling Between aReservoir Simulator and a Geomechanics Module. Paper SPE 78192 presented atthe SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference, Irving, Texas, 20-23 October. DOI:10.2118/78192-MS.
Yale, D.P. 2002. CoupledGeomechanics-Fluid Flow Modeling: Effects of Plasticity and PermeabilityAlteration. Paper SPE 78202 presented at the SPE/ISRM Rock MechanicsConference, Irving, Texas, 20-23 October. DOI: 10.2118/78202-MS.