Hydraulic-Fracture-Model Sensitivity Analyses of a Massively Stacked, Lenticular, Tight Gas Reservoir
- Christopher A. Green (Perenco Holdings Ltd) | Robert D. Barree (Barree & Associates) | Jennifer L. Miskimins (Colorado School of Mines)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2009
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 66 - 73
- 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 3 Production and Well Operations, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 4.3.4 Scale, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 2.2.2 Perforating, 1.2.3 Rock properties
- 115 in the last 30 days
- 1,505 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper assesses critically the importance of various inputs that are used for a common method to develop a simulator model of hydraulic fractures (HFs) in geologically complex, fluvial, tight gas reservoirs. A planar 3D fracture simulator is used with a fully coupled fluid-/solids-transport simulator. The geomechanical rock properties from logs (Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, and Biot's constant) and diagnostic minifracture injection tests of individual sandstone reservoirs were investigated to assess their importance in developing a valid stress model.
This paper describes the investigations by use of a model matched previously with both net surface pressure and microseismic/tiltmeter data. From these results, it is possible to obtain a better understanding of how fractures grow and interact with complex fluvial reservoirs, allowing operators to optimize field-well performance and completion methods better in these geologic settings. Additionally, the minimum critical data recommendations necessary to develop such a model have been identified and will aid operators in developing their data-acquisition programs. Although developed in the Rocky Mountain region, the presented technique can be extended to other similar geologically complex reservoirs worldwide.
Currently, engineers have to undertake an ever-more complete HF evaluation to evaluate fully the well potential and the effectiveness of the treatment design for creating the desired fracture. Geologically complex reservoirs require in-depth knowledge of both fluid mechanics and the reservoir-rock mechanics. It is only recently that the HF engineer has acquired the tools available to model reservoirs effectively by use of fully 3D models, coupled with improvements in reservoir analytical techniques.
The overall objective of this study is to undertake sensitivity analyses of a model matched previously with a method that practitioners consider to be accurate for developing a 3D HF simulation of a geologically complex reservoir. Previous work has been carried out in the Piceance basin (Ely et al. 1995) and other geologically similar tight gas reservoirs (Craig et al. 2000), but the techniques used in this study are those applied currently to generate input data for an accurate model of HFs in complex, fluvial, tight gas reservoirs. The simulator outputs were matched initially with direct diagnostic results from fracture mapping to help constrain the model and aid in the simulator-output matching process (Green et al. 2007). In that model, six different intervals containing several production zones each were hydraulically fractured and analyzed. This work is part of ongoing research to help operators and researchers identify the minimum data necessary to model and optimize effectively the HF treatments in geologically complex reservoirs.
The US Department of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory sponsored a number of projects during the 1980s, and a significant amount of the research work was undertaken at the Multi-Well Experiment site near Rifle, Colorado (Settari and Cleary 1986). This multidisciplinary research carried out in the Piceance basin has gone a long way in helping the stimulation-technology development in tight gas reservoirs. However, further development of stimulation technology requires models that can be used to analyze, target, and optimize HF treatments and to predict well production. This study assesses the inputs required to model a well in these complex geological systems and makes a recommendation for the minimum data necessary to develop a fully 3D model of a hydraulically fractured well.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||8|
Barree, R.D. 1983. A PracticalNumerical Simulator for Three-Dimensional Fracture Propagation in HeterogeneousMedia. Paper SPE 12273 presented at the SPE Reservoir StimulationSymposium, San Francisco, California, USA, 15-18 November. DOI:10.2118/12273-MS.
Barree, R.D. 1998. Applicationsof Pre-Frac Injection/Falloff Tests in Fissured Reservoirs--Field Examples.Paper SPE 39932 presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-PermeabilityReservoirs Symposium, Denver, 5-8 April. DOI: 10.2118/39932-MS.
Barree, R.D. 2000. Fracture modeling with GOHFER using extensive real-datainput. Proc., Three Dimensional and Advanced Hydraulic Fracture ModelingSymposium, Seattle, Washington, USA, 29 July 2000, 78-87.
Craig, D.P and Brown, T.D. 1999. Estimating Pore Pressure andPermeability in Massively Stacked Lenticular Reservoirs Using DiagnosticFracture-Injection Tests. Paper SPE 56600 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. DOI:10.2118/56600-MS.
Craig, D.P., Odegard, C.E, Pearson, W.C. Jr., and Schroeder, J.E. 2000. Case History: Observations FromDiagnostic Injection Tests in Multiple Pay Sands of the Mamm Creek Field,Piceance Basin, Colorado. Paper SPE 60321 presented at the SPE RockyMountain Regional/Low- Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition,Denver, 12-15 March. DOI: 10.2118/60321-MS.
Ely, J.W., Brown, T.D., and Reed, S.D. 1995. Optimization of Hydraulic FractureTreatments in the Williams Fork Formation of the Mesaverde Group. Paper SPE29551 presented at the Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 19-22March. DOI: 10.2118/29551-MS.
Gidley, J.L. 1989. Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing. MonographSeries, SPE, Richardson, Texas 12: 452.
Green, C.A., Barree, R.D., and Miskimins, J.L. 2007. Development of a Methodology forHydraulic Fracturing Models in Tight, Massively Stacked, LenticularReservoirs. Paper SPE 106269 presented at the SPE Hydraulic FracturingTechnology Conference, College Station, Texas, USA, 29-31 January. DOI:10.2118/106269-MS.
McGuire, W.J. and Sikora, V.J. 1960. The Effect of Vertical Fractures onWell Productivity. J. Pet Tech12 (10): 72-74;Trans., AIME, 219. SPE-1618-G. DOI: 10.2118/1618-G.
Miskimins, J.L. 2002. The effect of thin-bedded sands and shales onhydraulic fracture growth through the use of electrofacies and hydraulicfracture modeling. PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden,Colorado, 258.
Mullen, M., Roundtree, R. and Barree, R.D. 2007. A Composite Determination ofMechanical Rock Properties for Stimulation Design (What To Do When You Don'tHave a Sonic Log). Paper SPE 108139 presented at the Rocky Mountain Oil& Gas Technology Symposium, Denver, 16-18 April. DOI:10.2118/108139-MS.
Pantoja, D.M. 1998. Petrophysical analysis of vuggy carbonates andthin-bedded sands and shales for improved reservoir management. MS thesis,Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 226.
Settari, A. and Cleary, M.P. 1986. Development and Testing of aPseudo-Three-Dimensional Model of Hydraulic Fracture Geometry. SPE ProdEng 1 (6): 449-466; Trans., AIME, 281.SPE-10505-PA. DOI: 10.2118/10505-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Branagan, P.T., Peterson, R.E., and Wolhart, S.L. 1998a. An Interpretation of M-Site HydraulicFracture Diagnostic Results. Paper SPE 39950 presented at the SPE RockyMountain Regional/Low- Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 5-8 April.DOI: 10.2118/39950-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Peterson, R.E., Branagan, P.T., Engler, B.P., and Wolhart,S.L. 1998b. In-Situ Stress andModuli: Comparison of Values Derived from Multiple Techniques. Paper SPE49190 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, NewOrleans, 27-30 September. DOI: 10.2118/49190-MS.