Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

Testing Protocol And Breakeven Cost Analysis of Mud Dewatering For Closed-loop Drilling System

Authors
A.K. Wojtanowicz (The University of Texas at Austin)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/97-03-06
Document ID
PETSOC-97-03-06
Publisher
Petroleum Society of Canada
Source
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume
36
Issue
03
Publication Date
March 1997
Document Type
Journal Paper
Language
English
ISSN
0021-9487
Copyright
1997. Petroleum Society of Canada
Disciplines
1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 1.11.4 Solids Control, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 1.10 Drilling Equipment
Downloads
1 in the last 30 days
133 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 12.00
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 35.00
Abstract

Closed-loop drilling operations in environmentally sensitive areas require integration of conventional solids control system with chemically: enhanced centrifugation, a continuous dewatering process. The paper presents a design method for continuous dewatering. The method-is based on rigsite mud dewaterability testing and breakeven cost economics.

The protocol for dewaterability test describes instrumentation and stepwise procedure to measure, dewatering cake's moisture; content, and evaluate efficiency of volume reduction Emphasized is preparation of weighted mud samples through removal of weighting material and correction for residual barite. The presented testing protocol eliminates volumetric measurements and replaces them with weight measurements, which improve accuracy by an order of magnitude.

The paper explains how to use results from dewaterability tests to analyse cost efficiency of the dewatering component in closed-loop drilling operations. The analysis is based upon an analytical model of breakeven cost The model combines dewaterability with depth related quantities representing drilling progress and rates of waste generation; recycling and disposal The paper shows: 1. How to evaluate dewatering -performance; while drilling; 2. How to set up technical requirements soliciting bids for dewatering services; and, 3: How to predict drilling depth below which the process is not economical.

Introduction

Continuous dewatering of drilling mud is a well site process for separating and recycling the mud liquid phase and minimizing the volume of drilling waste. The process has been already patented (1) and used in field operations (2, 3, 4). The analysis of published reports from these applications shows that economic performance of the dewatering process depends primarily upon three factors: 1. high cost of off-sit~ disposal; 2. restricted disposal on-site (a ban on the annular injection, for example); and, 3. the degree of volume reduction attained thorough dewatering (5). Therefore, any successful implementation of the dewatering process requires testing the mud dewaterability and combining the test results with cost factors to analyse process economics.

Dewaterability is the ability of a drilling fluid to release its water phase if subjected to mechanical expression. Before the expression, the drilling fluid has to be chemically conditioned in order to destabilize the suspension and free the water phase. (The design of chemical conditioning and its optimization has been described elsewhere (6).) Like other characteristics of drilling muds-the API filtration, for instance-dewaterability results from complex physical mechanisms but can be determined simply by measuring relative volume of released water and moisture content of the dewatering drilling fluid to calculate volume reduction efficiency E VR. The objective of this paper is to present the dewaterability testing procedure.

Currently, the only method for evaluation of dewatering performance is based on post-well or monthly recaps. In this method, cumulative volume of waste drilling mud is used to average cumulative expenditures and calculate the cost of dewatering per barrel of waste mud (7). Then, this cost is compared with the hypothetical disposal cost of the same barrel without using dewatering process. Finally, a conclusion is made whether the use of dewatering would result in savings or losses. Although correct in principle, the method is deficient because it does not help to design the process or evaluate its daily performance.
File Size  1 MBNumber of Pages   13
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 11/12
    • Issue 9/10
    • Issue 7/8
    • Issue 7
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 13
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
Show more

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in