Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

Genetic Algorithm (GA)-Based Correlations Offer More Reliable Prediction of Minimum Miscibility Pressures (MMP) Between Reservoir Oil and CO or Flue Gas

Authors
M.K. Emera (University of Adelaide) | F. Javadpour (University of Calgary) | H.K. Sarma (University of Adelaide)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/07-08-01
Document ID
PETSOC-07-08-01
Publisher
Petroleum Society of Canada
Source
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
Volume
46
Issue
08
Publication Date
August 2007
Document Type
Journal Paper
Language
English
ISSN
0021-9487
Copyright
2007. Petroleum Society of Canada
Disciplines
6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 2.1.3 Sand/Solids Control, 4.3.3 Aspaltenes, 5.8.3 Coal Seam Gas, 5.4.9 Miscible Methods, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment
Downloads
1 in the last 30 days
495 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 12.00
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 35.00

Abstract

Two new genetic algorithm (GA)-based correlations were proposed for more reliable prediction of minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) between reservoir oil and CO2 or flue gas. Both correlations are particularly useful when experimental data are lacking and also in developing an optimal laboratory program to estimate MMP.

The key input parameters in a GA-based CO2-oil MMP correlation, in order of their impact, were: reservoir temperature, MW of C5+, and volatiles (C1 and N2) to intermediates (C2-C4, H2S and CO2) ratio. This correlation, which has been successfully validated with published experimental data and compared to common correlations in the literature, offered the best match with the lowest error (5.5%) and standard deviation (7.4%).

For a GA-based flue gas-oil MMP correlation, the MMP was regarded as a function of the injected gas solvency into the oil which, in turn, is related to the injected gas critical properties. It has also been successfully validated against published experimental data and compared to several correlations in the literature. It yielded the best match with the lowest average error (4.6%) and standard deviation (6.2%). Moreover, unlike other correlations, it can be used more reliably for gases with high N2 (up to 20%) and non-CO2 components (up to 78%), e.g., H2S, N2, SOx, O2 and C1-C4.

Introduction

The MMP is a vital design parameter for CO2 miscible flooding projects. It impacts both operational and reservoir engineering aspects during the flood. Therefore, an operator must investigate the effects of various factors on the MMP, and consequently, their eventual impact on the project's operational strategy and surface facilities. The main factors affecting MMP are: reservoir temperature, oil composition and injected gas purity. The reservoir temperature has a big impact on MMP, as the MMP increases with the increase in the temperature and decreases with its decrease(1-3). On the other hand, the oil composition has a significant impact on MMP in that the MMP increases with the increase in oil molecular weight. A high oil volatiles fraction (e.g. C1) in the reservoir oil causes the MMP to rise, whereas a high intermediates (e.g. C2-C4) fraction reduces the MMP(2). Furthermore, the presence of non-CO2 (e.g. H2S, N2, SOx and O2) in the injected gas affects MMP, either raising or lowering it depending on the type of the component. From an operational perspective, the existence of these non-CO2 components in the injected gas should not be treated as a rigid impediment. In fact, the existence of certain components such as H2S and SOx could have a positive impact, as they contribute towards lowering the MMP. The presence of C1 and N2, on the other hand, could be detrimental as they cause the MMP to rise. As the separation of such components from the gas is difficult and costly, the current trend is to use the flue gas stream as it is, provided such impurities are below a certain optimum level. A gas stream containing such non-CO2 components are referred to as either low-purity CO2 or flue gas in the context of this paper.

File Size  806 KBNumber of Pages   7
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 11/12
    • Issue 9/10
    • Issue 7/8
    • Issue 7
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 13
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 12
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 11
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 10
    • Issue 09
    • Issue 08
    • Issue 07
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 06
    • Issue 05
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
    • Issue 04
    • Issue 03
    • Issue 02
    • Issue 01
Show more

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in