Understanding Pore Structure of Mudrocks and Pore-Size Dependent Sorption Mechanism Using Small Angle Neutron Scattering
- Amirsaman Rezaeyan (Heriot-Watt University, the Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh, UK) | Timo Seemann (RWTH Aachen University, Clay and Interface Mineralogy, Aachen, Germany) | Pieter Bertier (RWTH Aachen University, Clay and Interface Mineralogy, Aachen, Germany) | Vitaliy Pipich (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Centre for Neutron Science at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum, Garching, Germany) | Leon Leu (Imperial College London, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, London, UK) | Niko Kampman (Shell Global Solutions International B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands) | Artem Feoktystov (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Centre for Neutron Science, at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum, Garching, Germany) | Lester Barnsley (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich Centre for Neutron Science, at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum, Garching, Germany) | Andreas Busch (Heriot-Watt University, the Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh, UK)
- Document ID
- Unconventional Resources Technology Conference
- SPE/AAPG/SEG Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 18-19 November, Brisbane, Australia
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC)
- Mudrocks, Pore Structure, Small Angle Neutron Scattering, Pore Size Distribution, Pore Size dependent Sorption Mechanism
- 46 in the last 30 days
- 46 since 2007
- Show more detail
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
To quantitatively analyse the pore structure at a broad pore scale range (~ 2 nm to ~ 2 μm), low pressure sorption (LPS) and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) were conducted on several mudrocks originating from radioactive waste storage sites, hydrocarbon seals and shale gas reservoirs across the globe. These include Opalinus Clay, Switzerland, Posidonia Shale, Germany, and Carmel Claystone, Bossier Shale, and Eagle Ford Shale, USA. Furthermore, upon injection of supercritical fluids (deuterated methane, CD4) into the pore space of mudrocks, the phase behaviour depending on pore size was investigated with subsequent neutron scattering. The results have revealed a vast heterogeneity, which can be related to the high clay contents. Due to the high clay contents, pores smaller than 10 nm constitute a large fraction of total porosity (25-30 %) and up to 80 % of specific surface area (SSA). Moreover, total porosity and SSA are not significantly affected by thermal maturation. However, thermal maturity contributes to different pore size distribution (PSD) related to meso- and macro-pores. Thermal maturation is likely to develop porosity at macroscale range, which can enhance the permeability for continuum flow in organic rich mudrocks. Results obtained from supercritical fluid sorption within SANS experiments demonstrated the formation of an adsorbed phase characterised by a higher density than predicted for the bulk fluid by the equation of state. The effect of sorbed phase is pore size dependent. It implies that the density as well as the volume fraction of the adsorbed phase are influenced by the pore structure; sorbed phase tends to fill small pores, followed by progressively filling larger pores. Mineralogy and maturity interplays contribute to a pore network of few-to-several nano-Darcy permeability in which pore size dependent transport mechanisms can vary from diffusional transport in small pores to slip flow in progressively larger pores. In order to improve pore network models, the incorporation of SANS PSD as well as pore size dependent sorption are important to more realistically understand storage capacity and/or transport phenomena in mudrocks.
|File Size||788 KB||Number of Pages||13|
Bahadur, J., Melnichenko, Y. B., Mastalerz, Maria. 2014. Hierarchical Pore Morphology of Cretaceous Shale: A Small-Angle Neutron Scattering and Ultrasmall-Angle Neutron Scattering Study. Energy & Fuels 28 (10): 6336–6344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef501832k.
Bahadur, Jitendra, Ruppert, Leslie F., Pipich, Vitaliy. 2018. Porosity of the Marcellus Shale: A contrast matching small-angle neutron scattering study. International Journal of Coal Geology 188: 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.02.002.
Blakey, Ronald C., Havholm, Karen G., and Jones, Lawrence S. 1996. Stratigraphic analysis of eolian interactions with marine and fluvial deposits, Middle Jurassic Page Sandstone and Carmel Formation, Colorado Plateau, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research 66 (2): 324–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/D426833D-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
Brunauer, Stephen, Deming, Lola S., Deming, W. Edwards. 1940. On a Theory of the van der Waals Adsorption of Gases. Journal of the American Chemical Society 62 (7): 1723–1732. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01864a025.
Busch, Andreas, Schweinar, Kevin, Kampman, Niko. 2017. Determining the porosity of mudrocks using methodological pluralism. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 454. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP454.1.
Feoktystov, Artem V., Frielinghaus, Henrich, Di, Zhenyu. 2015. KWS-1 high-resolution small-angle neutron scattering instrument at JCNS: current state. Journal of Applied Crystallography 48 (1): 61–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714025977
Javadpour, F. 2009. Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone). Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 48 (08): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.2118/09-08-16-DA.
Kampman, N., Busch, A., Bertier, P.. 2016. Article. Observational evidence confirms modelling of the long-term integrity of CO2-reservoir caprocks. Nature Communications 7: 12268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12268
Leu, L., Georgiadis, A., Blunt, M. J.. 2016. Multiscale Description of Shale Pore Systems by Scanning SAXS and WAXS Microscopy. Energy & Fuels 30 (12): 10282–10297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02256.
Loucks, Robert G., Reed, Robert M., Ruppel, Stephen C.. 2012. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG Bulletin 96 (6): 1071–1098. http://aapgbull.geoscienceworld.org/content/96/6/1071.abstract.
Melnichenko, Y. B. 2015. Small-Angle Scattering from Confined and Interfacial Fluids, 329: Springer, Cham, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01104-2.
Melnichenko, Y. B., Wignall, G. D., Cole, D. R.. 2006. Adsorption of supercritical CO2 in aerogels as studied by small-angle neutron scattering and neutron transmission techniques. The Journal of Chemical Physics 124 (20): 204711–11. http://link.aip.org/link/?JCP/124/204711/1.
Melnichenko, Yuri B., Mayama, H., Cheng, G.. 2009. Monitoring Phase Behavior of Sub- and Supercritical CO2 Confined in Porous Fractal Silica with 85% Porosity. Langmuir 26 (9): 6374–6379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la904032p.
NIST. Scattering Length Density Calculator. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for Neutron Research, https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/sldcalc.html.
Radlinski, A.P., Ioannidis, M.A., Hinde, A.L.. 2002. Multiscale characterization of reservoir rock microstructure: combining small angle neutron scattering and image analysis. Proc., Proceedings of 2002 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA2002-35), Monterey, California, Sept. 23-27.
Rother, Gernot, Melnichenko, Yuri B., Cole, David R.. 2007. Microstructural Characterization of Adsorption and Depletion Regimes of Supercritical Fluids in Nanopores. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111 (43): 15736–15742. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp073698c.