Automated Stimulation Design Allocation in Multiple Coal Seam Wells Offers Efficient, Consistent and Compliant Framework
- Steven Dewar (Origin Energy Ltd) | Andrew Hall (Pentagram Petrophysics Pty Ltd) | Elliot Kirk-Burnnand | Sameer Ganpule (Origin Energy Ltd)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, 17-19 November, Virtual
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 2.2.2 Perforating, 2 Well completion, 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 5.6 Formation Evaluation & Management
- Automated Stimulation, Frac Design, Optimisation, Compliance, Coal Seam Gas
- 9 in the last 30 days
- 9 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
One of the keys to successful and environmentally responsible well stimulation programs in coal seam gas development is to establish consistent procedures for the safeguarding, planning and executing activities across multiple wells. The aim of this paper is to show how a novel application of petrophysical program scripting can be used to make the stimulation process more efficient, consistent and compliant across assets with varying requirements.
A macro embedded in petrophysical evaluation software applies a series of rules to rank coals by thickness, allocate a series of perforations and stimulation type based upon coal rank and spacing and then produces actionable treatment schedules which are seamlessly implemented in well stimulation operations at well sites. To do this, the macro grades all coals within the well by thickness based upon a cut-off on the density log, with the thickest coal being graded highest. The macro then identifies the top ranked coal and places perforations based on user defined logic, geological information from offset wells, permeability attributes of the target coal layer(s), depth and vertical separation between adjoining coal targets. Based on the stimulation type assigned, a stimulation schedule is generated that includes estimates of fluid volumes, proppant volumes, injection rates, proppant ramp type and stipulates flush conditions (over-flush or under-flush).
Coals thicker than a maximum perforation size are perforated in an upper, middle and lower configuration. Most coals are thinner than the maximum allowable perforation interval and so the macro looks up and down the borehole to include thinner coals within a potential perforation window. The system then generates the stimulation schedule as described above. The macro continues to allocate perforations and stimulation schedules for each validated coal interval and sequentially tries to maximise the total target coal interval along the wellbore. Certain environmental constraints are included in the macro logic to maintain local and regional commitments. For example, coal zones in proximity of permeable non-coal layers i.e. interburden are automatically excluded from stimulation.
Multiple advantages of this system have been realised including, a) effective QA/QC as outputs can be directly plotted against the well logs giving the user a quick and easy visual check b) actionable instructions that site based teams can execute including exact perforation depths and stimulation schedules c) provide realistic materials and costs estimates that ensure efficient planning and logistics, d) monitor and document any variations between allocated schedule versus actual execution, e) provide estimate of expected net coal connectivity at a well, development package and asset level which feeds into production and recovery forecasts, f) plan future optimisation studies or pilots and g) most importantly offers a consistent, efficient and compliant framework that can be applied across multiple assets, engineering teams and service providers.
This paper focuses on capabilities and advantages of using a macro to automate stimulation design allocation for CSG multi-well (>100 wells) assets. Details of individual stimulation designs for Walloons Coal measures are mentioned in other publications (Kirk-Burnnand et al., 2015 and Flottmann et al. 2018) and hence not covered here.
|File Size||10 MB||Number of Pages||22|
Flottmann, T., Pandey, V. J., Ganpule, S., Kirk-Burnnand, E., Zadmehr, M., Simms, N., Jenkinson, J., Renwick-Cooke, T., Tarenzi, M. and Mishra, A. Fracture Stimulation Challenges in Tight Walloons Coal Measures: Surat Basin Queensland, Australia. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 191958, Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, October 23-25, 2018, Brisbane, Australia.
Green, P.M., Carmichael, D.C., Brain, T.J., Murray, C.G., McKeller, J.L., Beeston, J.W. & Gray, A.R.G. 1997. Lithostratigraphic units in the Bowen and Surat Basin Queensland. In: Green, P.M. ed. The Surat and Bowen Basins, south-east Queensland, pp.41-108. Minerals and Energy Review Series, Queensland Department of Mines and Energy. Brisbane Qld.
Hamilton, S.K., Esterle, J.S. and Sliwa, R. 2014. Stratigraphic and depositional framework of the Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Queensland, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences: An International Geoscience Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 61 (8): 1061-1080, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08120099.2014.960000
Hoffman, K.L., Totterdell, J.M., Dixon, O., Simpson, G.A., Brakel, A.T., Wells, A.T. and McKellar, J.L. 2009, Sequence stratigraphy of Jurassic strata in the lower Surat Basin succession, Queensland, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences: An International Geoscience Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 56:3, 461-476, https://doi.org/10.1080/08120090802698737
Kirk-Burnnand, E., Pandey, V. J., Flottmann, T. and Trubshaw, R. L. 2015. Hydraulic Fracture Design Optimisation in Low Permeability Coals, Surat Basin, Australia. Presented at The SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 9-11 November. SPE-176895-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/176895-MS.
Scott, S, Anderson, B, Crosdale, P.Dingwall, J. and Leblang, G. 2004. Revised Geology and Coals Seam Gas Characteristics of the Walloon Subgroup – Surat Basin Queensland, Australia. In: Boult, P.J., Johns, D.R. and Lang, S.C. (eds.): Proceedings of the Eastern Australasian Basins symposium, Petroleum Exploration Society Australia Special publication, 345-355.
Tavener, E., Flottmann, T and Brooke-Barnett, S. 2017. In situ stress distribution and mechanical stratigraphy in the Bowen and Surat Basins, Queensland, Australia, In: Turner, J.P., Healy, D.; Hillis, R.R., Welch, M.J. Geomechanics and Geology, Geological Society London Special Publication 458, pp. 31-48.
Turner, S., Bean, L.B., Dettmann, M., McKeller, J.L., McLoughlin, S., and Thulborn, T. 2009, Australian Jurassic sedimentary and fossil sucessions: current work and future prospects for marine and non-marine correlation, GFF,131:1-2, 49-70, https://doi.org/10.1080/11035890902924877