A Critical Review of Capillary Number and its Application in Enhanced Oil Recovery
- Hu Guo (China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Yan'an Universtiy and Universitat Stuttgart) | Kaoping Song (China University of Petroleum-Beijing) | Rudolf Hilfer (Universitat Stuttgart)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, 31 August - 4 September, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 2 Well completion, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.3.6 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex)
- capillary number, interfacial tension, capillary desaturation curve, EOR, chemical flooding
- 114 in the last 30 days
- 120 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Capillary number (Ca), defined as dimensionless ratio of viscous force to capillary force, is one of the most important parameters in enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The ratio of viscous and capillary force is scale-dependent. At least 33 different Cas have been proposed, indicating inconsistencies between various applications and publications. The most concise definition containing velocity, interfacial tension and viscosity is most widely used in EOR. Many chemical EOR applications are thus based on the correlation between residual oil saturation (ROS) and Ca, which is also known as capillary desaturation curve (CDC). Various CDCs lead to a basic conclusion of using surfactant to reduce interfacial to ultra-low to get a minimum ROS and maximum displacement efficiency. However, after a deep analysis of Ca and recent new experimental observations, the traditional definition of Ca was found to have many limitations and based on misunderstandings. First, the basic object in EOR is a capillary-trapped oil ganglia thus Darcy's law is only valid under certain conditions. Further, many recent tests reported results contradicting previous ones. It seems most Cas cannot account for mixed-wet CDC. The influence of wettability on two-phase flow is important but not reflected in the definition of the Ca. Then, it is certainly very peculiar that, when the viscous and capillary forces acting on a blob are equal, the current most widely used classic Ca is equal to 2.2* 10−3. Ideally, the condition Ca ∼ 1 marks the transition from capillary dominated to viscous-dominated flow, but most Cas cannot fulfill this expectation. These problems are caused by scale dependent flow characterization. It has been proved that the traditional Ca is of microscopic nature. Based on the dynamic characterization of the change of capillary force and viscous force in macroscopic scale, a macroscopic Ca can well explain these complex results. The requirement of ultra-low IFT from microscopic Ca for surfactant flood is not supported by macroscopic Ca. The effect of increasing water viscosity to EOR is much higher than reducing IFT. Realizing the microscopic nature of the traditional Ca and using CDCs based on the more reasonable macroscopic Ca helps to update screening criteria for chemical flooding.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||32|
Sheng JJ. Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Studies. 1st ed. London: Gulf Professional Publishing; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386545-8.00022-1.
Rucker M, Berg S, Armstrong RT, Georgiadis A, Ott H, Schwing A, From connected pathway flow to ganglion dynamics. Geophys Res Lett 2015;42:3888–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064007.
Thomas S, Farouq Ali SM. Micellar-Polymer Flooding: Status and Recent Advances. J Can Pet Technol 1992;31:53–60. https://doi.org/10.2118/92-08-05.
Guo H, Li Y, Kong D, Ma R, Li B, Wang F. Lessons Learned from Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer(ASP) Flooding Field Tests in China. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 2019;22:78–99. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.2118/186036-PA.
Guo H, Dou M, Hanqing W, Wang F, Yuanyuan G, Yu Z, Review of Capillary Number in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Kuwait Oil Gas Show Conf 2015. https://doi.org/10.2118/175172-MS.
Zhu Y, Hou Q, Jian G, Ma D, Wang Z. Current development and application of chemical combination flooding technique. Pet Explor Dev 2013;40:96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60009-9.
Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Niu J, Liu W, Hou Q. The research progress in the alkali-free surfactant-polymer combination flooding technique. Pet Explor Dev 2012;39:371–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60053-6.
Liu W, Luo L, Liao G, Zuo L, Wei Y, Jiang W. Experimental study on the mechanism of enhancing oil recovery by polymer-surfactant binary flooding. Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Explor Dev 2017;44:600–7. https://doi.org/10.11698/PED.2017.04.13.
Larson RG, Davis HT, Scriven LE. Displacement of residual nonwetting fluid from porous media. Chem Eng Sci 1981;36:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(81)80049-8.
Moore TF, Slobod RL. Displacement of Oil by Water-Effect of Wettability, Rate, and Viscosity on Recovery. SPE- 502-G. Fall Meet. Pet. Branch AIME, 1955, p. 16. https://doi.org/10.2118/502-G.
Reed LR, Healy RN. Some Physicochemical Aspects of Microemulsion Flooding: A Review. AIChE Symp. Improv. Oil Recover. by Surfactant Polym. Flooding, Kansas City, Kansas, 12-14 April, 1977, p. 383–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90406-6.
Arriola A, Willhite GP, Green DW. Trapping of Oil Drops in a Noncircular Pore Throat and Mobilization Upon Contact With a Surfactant. SPE-9404-PA. Soc Pet Eng J 1983;23:99–114. https://doi.org/10.2118/9404-pa.
Chatzis I, Morrow N. Correlation of Capillary Number Relationships for Sandstone. Soc Pet Eng J 1984;24:555–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/10114-PA.
Morrow N, Lim H, Ward J. Effect of Crude-Oil-Induced Wettability Changes on Oil Recovery. SPE Form Eval 1986;1:89–103. https://doi.org/10.2118/13215-PA.
Chatzis I, Kuntamukkula MS, Morrow NR. Effect of Capillary Number on the Microstructure of Residual Oil in Strongly Water-Wet Sandstones. SPE-13213-PA. SPE Reserv Eng 1988;3:903–12. https://doi.org/10.2118/13213-PA.
Morrow NR, Chatzis I, Taber JJ. Entrapment and Mobilization of Residual Oil in Bead Packs. SPE Reserv Eng 1988;3:927–34. https://doi.org/10.2118/14423-PA.
Delshad M, Fathi Najafabadi N, Anderson G, Pope G, Sepehrnoori K. Modeling Wettability Alteration By Surfactants in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 2009;12:361–70. https://doi.org/10.2118/100081-PA.
AlQuaimi BI, Rossen WR. Capillary Desaturation Curve for Residual Nonwetting Phase in Natural Fractures. SPE J 2018;23:788–802. https://doi.org/10.2118/189448-PA.
Chatzis I, Morrow NR. Correlation of Capillary Number Relationships for Sandstone. SPE-101 14-PA. Soc Pet Eng J 1984;24:555–62. https://doi.org/10.2118/10114-PA.
Leverett MC. Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids. SPE-941152-G. Trans AIME 1941;142:152–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1958.200.129.
Lefebvre du Prey EJ. Factors Affecting Liquid-Liquid Relative Permeabilities of a Consolidated Porous Medium. SPE-3039-PA. Soc Pet Eng J 1973;13:39–47. https://doi.org/10.2118/3039-PA.
Melrose JC, Brandner CF. Role of Capillary Forces in Determining Microscopic Displacement Efficiency for Oil Recovery by Waterflooding. J Can Pet Technol 1974;13:54–62. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.2118/74-04-05.
Ehrlich R, Hasiba HH, Raimondi P. Alkaline Waterflooding for Wettability Alteration-Evaluating a Potential Field Application. J Pet Technol 1974;26:1335–43. https://doi.org/10.2118/4905-PA.
Abrams A. The Influence of Fluid Viscosity, Interfacial Tension, and Flow Velocity on Residual Oil Saturation Left by Waterflood. Soc Pet Eng J 1975;15:437–47. https://doi.org/10.2118/5050-PA.
Stegemeier GL. Mechanisms of Entrapment and Mobilization of Oil in Porous Media. Improv. Oil Recover. by Surfactant Polym. Flooding, New York City: Academic Press. Inc; 1977, p. 55–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-641750-0.50006-2.
Hughes RG, Blunt MJ. Network modeling of multiphase flow in fracture. Adv Water Resour 2001;24:409–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00064-6.
Armstrong RT, Georgiadis A, Ott H, Klemin D, Berg S. Critical capillary number: Desaturation studied with fast X- ray computed microtomography. Geophys Res Lett 2014;41:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058075.
Hilfer R, Armstrong RT, Berg S, Georgiadis A, Ott H. Capillary saturation and desaturation. Phys Rev E 2015;92:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.063023.
Chang C, Kneafsey TJ, Zhou Q, Oostrom M, Ju Y. Scaling the impacts of pore-scale characteristics on unstable supercritical CO2-water drainage using a complete capillary number. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2019;86:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.04.010.
Hilfer R. Macroscopic equations of motion for two-phase flow in porous media. Phys Rev E 1998;58:2090–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.2090.
Anton L, Hilfer R. Trapping and mobilization of residual fluid during capillary desaturation in porous media. Phys Rev E 1999;59:6819–23. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.59.6819.
Biswal B, Hilfer R. Microstructure analysis of reconstructed porous media. Physica A 1999;266:307–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00607-4.
Hilfer R, Besserer H. Macroscopic two-phase flow in porous media. Phys B 2000;279:125–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(99)00694-8.
Hilfer R. Review on scale dependent characterization of the microstructure of porous media. Transp Porous Media 2002;46:373–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015014302642.
Pickup GE, Hern CY. The development of appropriate upscaling procedures. Transp Porous Media 2002;46:119–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015055515059.
Hilfer R. Capillary pressure, hysteresis and residual saturation in porous media. Physica A 2006;359:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.05.086.
Hilfer R. Macroscopic capillarity without a constitutive capillary pressure function. Physica A 2006;371:209–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.051.
Hilfer R. Macroscopic capillarity and hysteresis for flow in porous media. Phys Rev E 2006;73:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016307.
Yeganeh M, Hegner J, Lewandowski E, Mohan A, Lake LW, Cherney D, Capillary Desaturation Curve Fundamentals. SPE Improv. Oil Recover. Conf., 2016, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.2118/179574-MS.
Lenormand R, Zarcone C. Physics of Blob Displacement in a Two-Dimensional Porous Medium. SPE Form Eval 1988;3:271–5. https://doi.org/10.2118/14882-PA.
Mohanty K. Multiphase Flow in Porous Media: III. Oil Mobilization, Transverse Dispersion, and Wettability. SPE-12127-MS. SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib., 1983. https://doi.org/10.2523/12127-MS.
Andrew CE, Fjelde I, Abeysinghe K, Lohne A. Effect of interfacial tension on water/oil relative permeability and remaining saturation with consideration of capillary pressure. SPE-143028-MS. SPE Eur. Conf. Exhib. held Vienna, Austria, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2118/143028-MS.
Abeysinghe KP, Fjelde I, Lohne A. Dependency of remaining oil saturation on wettability and capillary number. SPE Saudi Arab Sect Tech Symp Exhib 2012. https://doi.org/10.2118/160883-MS.
Zhang H, Dong M, Zhao S. Which one is more important in chemical flooding for enhanced court heavy oil recovery, lowering interfacial tension or reducing water mobility? Energy and Fuels 2010;24:1829–36. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901310v.
Gao S, Peng S, Han P, Chen G, Liu H, Yan W, Enhanced oil recovery test based on wells and stations utilization to reduce cost after polymer flooding. SPE Middle East Oil Gas Show Conf. MEOS, 2019, p. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2118/194752-ms.
Hou J, Liu Z, Zhang S, Yue X, Yang J. The role of viscoelasticity of alkali/surfactant/polymer solutions in enhanced oil recovery. J Pet Sci Eng 2005;47:219–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.04.001.
Shen P, Wang J, Yuan S, Zhong T, Jia X. Study of enhanced-oil-recovery mechanism of alkali/surfactant/polymer flooding in porous media from experiments. SPE J 2009;14:237–44. https://doi.org/10.2118/126128-PA.
Qi LQ, Liu ZZ, Yang CZ, Yin YJ, Hou JR, Zhang J, Supplement and optimization of classical capillary number experimental curve for enhanced oil recovery by combination flooding. Sci China Technol Sci 2014;57:2190–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5666-2.
Wang D, Wang G, Wu W, Xia H, Yin H. The influence of viscoelasticity on displacement efficiency -From micro- To macroscale. SPE Annu Tech Conf Exhib 2007;1:304–13. https://doi.org/10.2523/109016-ms.
Azad MS, Trivedi JJ. Quantification of the Viscoelastic Effects During Polymer Flooding: A Critical Review. SPE J 2019:1–27. https://doi.org/10.2118/195687-pa.
Wang D, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Gong X, Wang G. Viscous-Elastic Polymer Fluids Rheology and Its Effect Upon Production Equipment. SPE-77496-PA. SPE Prod Facil 2004;19:209–16. https://doi.org/10.2118/77496-PA.
Wang D, Cheng J, Yang Q, Gong W, Li Q. Viscous-elastic polymer can increase microscale displacement efficiency in cores. SPE-63227-MS. SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib., 2000. https://doi.org/10.2523/63227-ms.
Qi P, Ehrenfried DH, Koh H, Balhoff MT. Reduction of residual oil saturation in sandstone cores by use of viscoelastic polymers. SPE J 2017;22:447–58. https://doi.org/10.2118/179689-PA.
Erincik MZ, Qi P, Balhoff MT, Pope GA. New method to reduce residual oil saturation by polymer flooding. SPE J 2018;23:1944–56. https://doi.org/10.2118/187230-pa.
Mai A, Bryan J, Goodarzi N, Kantzas A. Insights into non-thermal recovery of heavy oil. J Can Pet Technol 2009;48:27–35. https://doi.org/10.2118/09-03-27.
Andrew EC, Fjelde I, Abeysinghe K, Lohne A. Effect of Interfacial Tension on Water/Oil Relative Permeability on the Basis of History Matching to Coreflood Data. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 2014;17:37–48. https://doi.org/10.2118/143028-PA.
Lenormand R, Touboul E, Zarcone C. Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media. J Fluid Mech 1988;189:165–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088000953.
McDougall SR, Sorbie KS. Combined effect of capillary and viscous forces on waterflood displacement efficiency in finely laminated porous media. SPE Annu Tech Conf Exhib 1993;Sigma:563–78. https://doi.org/10.2523/26659-ms.
Georgiadis A, Berg S, Makurat A, Maitland G, Ott H. Pore-scale micro-computed-tomography imaging: Nonwetting- phase cluster-size distribution during drainage and imbibition. Phys Rev E 2013;88:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.033002.
Hilfer R, Lemmer A. Differential porosimetry and permeametry for random porous media. Phys Rev E - Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys 2015;92:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.013305.
Hilfer R, Biswal B, Mattutis HG, Janke W. Multicanonical simulations of the tails of the order-parameter distribution of the two-dimensional Ising model. Comput Phys Commun 2005;169:230–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2005.03.053.
Hilfer R, Seybold HJ. Computation of the generalized Mittag-Leffler function and its inverse in the complex plane. Integr Transform Spec Funct 2006;17:637–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652460600725341.
Aghaei A, Piri M. Direct pore-to-core up-scaling of displacement processes: Dynamic pore network modeling and experimentation. J Hydrol 2015;522:488–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.004.
Mattila K, Puurtinen T, Hyvaluoma J, Surmas R, Myllys M, Turpeinen T, A prospect for computing in porous materials research: Very large fluid flow simulations. J Comput Sci 2016;12:62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2015.11.013.
Biswal B, Manwart C, Hilfer R. Three-dimensional local porosity analysis of porous media. Phys A Stat Mech Its Appl 1998;255:221–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00111-3.
Dullien F a. L. Porous Media Fluid Transport and Pore Structure Second Edition. 2nd ed. Academic Press. Inc; 1992. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.005657.
Schluter S, Berg S, Rucker M, Armstrong RT, Vogel HJ, Hilfer R, Pore-scale displacement mechanisms as a source of hysteresis for two-phase flow in porous media. Water Resour Res 2016;52:2194–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018254.
Zhao B, MacMinn CW, Juanes R. Wettability control on multiphase flow in patterned microfluidics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:10251–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603387113.
Rabbani HS, Or D, Liu Y, Lai CY, Lu NB, Datta SS, Suppressing viscous fingering in structured porous media. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:4833–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800729115.
Hoyer P, Alvarado V, Carvalho MS. Snap-offin constricted capillary with elastic interface. Phys Fluids 2016;28. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4939150.
Pak T, Butler IB, Geiger S, Van Dijke MIJ, Sorbie KS. Droplet fragmentation: 3D imaging of a previously unidentified pore-scale process during multiphase flow in porous media. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:1947–52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420202112.
Datta SS, Ramakrishnan TS, Weitz DA. Mobilization of a trapped non-wetting fluid from a three-dimensional porous medium. Phys Fluids 2014;26. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4866641.
Berg S, Ott H, Klapp SA, Schwing A, Neiteler R, Brussee N, Real-time 3D imaging of Haines jumps in porous media flow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:3755–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221373110.
Armstrong RT, Berg S. Interfacial velocities and capillary pressure gradients during Haines jumps. Phys Rev E 2013;88:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.043010.
Stegemeier GL. Relationship of Trapped Oil Saturation to Petrophysical Properties of Porous Media. SPE Improv Oil Recover Symp 1974. https://doi.org/10.2118/4754-MS.
Andrew M, Bijeljic B, Blunt MJ. Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography. Adv Water Resour 2014;68:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.014.
Ruspini LC, Farokhpoor R, oren PE. Pore-scale modeling of capillary trapping in water-wet porous media: A new cooperative pore-body filling model. Adv Water Resour 2017;108:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.07.008.
Zhao B, MacMinn CW, Primkulov BK, Chen Y, Valocchi AJ, Zhao J, Comprehensive comparison of pore- scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116:13799–806. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116.
Bourgoyne AT, Caudle B.H., Kimbler O.K. Effect of interfacial films on the displacement of oil by water in porous media. SPE-3272-PA. Soc Pet Eng J 1972;12:60–8. https://doi.org/10.2118/3272-pa.
Cooke CE, Williams RE, Kolodzie PA. Oil Recovery By Alkaline Waterflooding. J Pet Technol 1974;26:1365–74. https://doi.org/10.2118/4739-PA.
Lakatos-Szabo J, Lakatos I. Effect of alkaline materials on interfacial rheological properties of oil-water systems. Colloid Polym Sci 1999;277:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003960050365.
Raj I, Qu M, Xiao L, Hou J, Li Y, Liang T, Ultralow concentration of molybdenum disulfide nanosheets for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 2019;251:514–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.078.
Luo D, Wang F, Zhu J, Cao F, Liu Y, Li X, Nanofluid of graphene-based amphiphilic Janus nanosheets for tertiary or enhanced oil recovery: High performance at low concentration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:7711–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608135113.
Radnia H, Rashidi A, Solaimany Nazar AR, Eskandari MM, Jalilian M. A novel nanofluid based on sulfonated graphene for enhanced oil recovery. J Mol Liq 2018;271:795–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.070.
Rosestolato JCS, Perez-Gramatges A, Lachter ER, Nascimento RSV. Lipid nanostructures as surfactant carriers for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel 2019;239:403–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.11.027.
Dai C, Huang Y, Lyu X, Li L, Sun Y, Zhao M, Solid-like film formed by nano-silica self-assembly at oil-water interface. Chem Eng Sci 2019;195:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.11.042.
Berthet H, Hebert M, Barbouteau S, Andriamananjaona P, Rivenq R. Pore-scale insights on trapped oil during waterflooding of sandstone rocks of varying wettability states'. Petrophysics 2019;60:229–39. https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV60N2-2019a1.
Alpak FO, Zacharoudiou I, Berg S, Dietderich J, Saxena N. Direct simulation of pore-scale two-phase visco-capillary flow on large digital rock images using a phase-field lattice Boltzmann method on general-purpose graphics processing units. Comput Geosci 2019;23:849–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-9818-0.
Teklu TW, Alameri W, Kazemi H, Graves RM. Contact angle measurements on conventional and unconventional reservoir cores. Unconv. Resour. Technol. Conf. URTeC 2015, 2015, p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2118/178568-ms.
Seright RS. How Much Polymer Should Be Injected During a Polymer Flood? Review of Previous and Current Practices. SPE J 2017;22:11–3. https://doi.org/10.2118/179543-PA.