Impact of Well Shut-in After Hydraulic-Fracture Treatments on Productivity and Recovery in Shale Oil Reservoirs
- Esmail Eltahan (The University of Texas at Austin) | Fabio Bordeaux Rego (The University of Texas at Austin) | Wei Yu (The University of Texas at Austin, Sim Tech LLC) | Kamy Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, 31 August - 4 September, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.8 Formation Damage, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 1.8 Formation Damage, 2 Well completion, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- Imbibition, Water Block, Improved Oil Recovery, Unconventional Resources, Reservoir Simulation
- 141 in the last 30 days
- 150 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Water invasion, associated with hydraulic fracturing, often causes hydrocarbon-mobility hindrance, known as water blocking. The effect on productivity is largely dependent on saturation profiles inside fractures and formation matrix. Enhancement to hydrocarbon recovery has been reported in some field cases after shutting in wells for long time periods. Here we conduct numerical-simulation studies to investigate the effect of well shut-in on initial productivity and long-term recovery.
We replicate post-fracturing conditions with an extensive fracture network that intermeshes with formation matrix. The models are designed using either logarithmically spaced, locally refined grid or embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM). Starting with varying initial fluid distributions, we compare productivity and recovery of two cases: one that does not start production until after 32 days of shut-in, and another that starts immediately without soaking. For the initial conditions that favor shut-in, we carry out case studies in attempt to find the ideal shut-in conditions for maximum recovery improvement.
Results confirm improvement in early productivity after shut-in for all the considered initial fluid-distribution cases. The majority of cases exhibit net gain in total oil recovery. We report improvement in recovery of as much as 5%, owing to spontaneous imbibition. Imbibition of the injected water into formation matrix causes fluid redistribution and favored mobility for the non-wetting phase, and hence enhanced hydrocarbon productivity. The simulations take into account spontaneous imbibition and gravity segregation, but do not consider geo-mechanical forces, water adsorption or chemical reactions. When capillary forces are neglected, well productivity and recovery decrease, even when the well is not shut in. Such observations underline imbibition counter-current flow as an important production mechanism that should not be neglected in shale-oil-reservoir simulations.
|File Size||8 MB||Number of Pages||24|
Bostrom, N., Chertov, M., Pagels, M., Willberg, D., Chertova, A., Davis, M., and Zagorski, W. 2014. The Time-Dependent Permeability Damage Caused by Fracture Fluid. Paper SPE 168140, presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 26–28 February.
Fan, L., Thompson, J.W., and Robinson, J.R. 2010. Understanding Gas Production Mechanism and Effectiveness of Well Stimulation in the Haynesville Shale through Reservoir Simulation. Paper SPE 136696, presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19–21 October.