Geomechanical Characterization and Modeling in the Montney for Hydraulic Fracturing Optimization
- Qiuguo Li (Schlumberger) | Oscar Michi (Schlumberger) | Drazenko Boskovic (Schlumberger) | Alexey Zhmodik (Schlumberger) | Majid Faskhoodi (Schlumberger) | Giselle Ferrer (Schlumberger) | Venkateshwaran Ramanathan (Schlumberger) | Taofeek Ogunyemi (Schlumberger) | Raouf Ameuri (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, 29 September - 2 October, Virtual
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1.8 Seismic Modelling, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 0.2 Wellbore Design, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 3.3.2 Borehole Imaging and Wellbore Seismic, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 2 Well completion, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 3.3 Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, 3 Production and Well Operations, 0.2.2 Geomechanics
- stimulated rock volume, Montney, hydraulic fracturing, Geomechanics, microseismic
- 33 in the last 30 days
- 33 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Geomechanics plays a significant role in hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation and in the interaction between hydraulic fractures and natural fractures, especially in unconventional reservoirs. This paper provides a detailed description of a geomechanical characterization and modeling study for evaluating the impact of geomechanics on completions and hydraulic fracturing stimulations optimization in the Montney resource play, Canada.
Following an integrated workflow, 1D mechanical earth models (MEM) for ten wells were constructed in the study area. These 1D MEMs include elastic and strength properties, pore pressure, direction and magnitude of in-situ stresses. Extensive rock mechanics core testing data were used to calibrate the elastic and strength properties. Pore pressure and fracture closure pressure data from diagnostic fracture injection tests were also available to calibrate pore pressure and minimum in-situ stress. Maximum horizontal stress was constrained by modeling wellbore stability and matching it with caliper logs and wellbore stability features on wellbore image.
A 3D mechanical earth model was subsequently constructed using a 3D geological model, the 1D MEMs, and seismic inversion data. Elastic properties from seismic inversion were used to populate mechanical properties in the 3D model. In-situ stresses were numerically simulated to account for the impact of faults and structural and mechanical property variation on in-situ stress distribution.
The geomechanical analysis shows that there is a decreasing trend in Young’s modulus from upper Montney to lower Montney while Poisson’s ratio is relatively constant in the Montney. The pore pressure in some parts of the field is high and varies across the field. Stress regime is predominantly strike-slip with relatively large stress anisotropy, and this has implications on the hydraulic fracture network that would be simulated, shearing of natural fractures and the stimulated reservoir volume. Rock elastic and strength properties, pore pressure, and in-situ stresses were found to be heterogenous across the whole field. The relatively large variation in pore pressure in the study area and the structural complexities have large impact on the distribution of stresses. Faults alter the stress distribution locally and could affect hydraulic fracture propagation. Hydraulic fracture simulations were subsequently performed, and the geometry of the simulated hydraulic fractures and the stimulated reservoir volume were validated with microseismic events. The effects of geomechanics on fracture geometry and ultimately reservoir production were evaluated.
Because of the significant impact of geomechanics on hydraulic fracturing, it is critical to characterize and model geomechanics accurately. This paper provides a comprehensive approach and application to a field in the Montney, showcasing the integrated method of geomechanical characterization and hydraulic fracture simulation and production modeling using various data. The analysis provides an interrelationship among geomechanical parameters, microseismicity and stimulated reservoir volume.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Albright, J.N. and Pearson, C.F. 1982. Acoustic Emissions as a Tool for Hydraulic Fracture Location: Experience at the Fenton Hill Hot Dry Rock Site. SPE J., 22 (4): 523–530. SPE-9509-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9509-PA.
Chen, Z., Narayan S.P., Yang, Z. and Rahman S.S. 2000. An Experimental Investigation of Hydraulic Behaviour of Fractures and Joints in Granitic Rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci., 37 (7): 1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00039-3.
Handwerger, D.A., Willberg, D., Pagels, M., Rowland, B. and Keller, J.F. 2012. Reconciling Retort versus Dean Stark Measurements on Tight Shales. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8–10 October. SPE-159976-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/159976-MS.
Mayerhofer, M.J., Lolon, E.P., Warpinski, N.R., Cipolla, C.L., Walser, D. and Rightmire, C.M. 2010. What is Stimulated Reservoir Volume? SPE Production & Operations, 25 (1). SPE-119890-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/119890-PA.
Rutledge, J.T. and Phillips, W.S. 2003. Hydraulic Stimulation of Natural Fractures as Revealed by Induced Microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, East Texas. Geophysics, 68 (2): 441. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1567214.
Thiercelin, M.J. and Plumb, R.A. 1991. A Core-Based Prediction of Lithologic Stress Contrasts in East Texas Formations. Paper presented at the 1991 SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting and Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado, 15–17 April. SPE-21847-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/21847-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Mayerhofer, M.J., Vincent, M.C., Cipolla, C.L., and Lolon, E.P. 2008. Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity. Paper presented at the SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference, Keystone, Colorado, USA, 10–12 February. SPE-114173-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/114173-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Wolhart, S.L., and Wright, C.A. 2004. Analysis and Prediction of Microseismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE J., 9 (1): 24–33. SPE-87673-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/87673-PA.
Yu, X., Leaney, S., Sun, J., Pankaj, P.Weng, X., Onda, H., Donovan, M., Nielsen, J. and Duhault, J. 2015. Integration of Microseismic Data and an Unconventional Fracture Modeling Tool to Generate the Hydraulically Induced Fracture Network: A Case Study from the Cardium Formation, West Central Alberta, Canada. Paper presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference held in San Antonio, Texas, USA, 20–22 July. URTeC-2015-2154594. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2154594.