Productivity Index for SAGD Producers During Steam-Flashing: Coning Model I and II
- Mazda Irani (Ashaw Energy Ltd.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Canada Heavy Oil Conference, 29 September - 2 October, Virtual
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5.8 History Matching, 2.3.3 Inflow Control Equipment, 2 Well completion, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 2.3 Completion Monitoring Systems/Intelligent Wells, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 2.4 Sand Control, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
- Flow-Control-Device, Flashing, IPR, subcool, localized flashing
- 54 in the last 30 days
- 54 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Over the last decade, steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process has been successfully commercialized in Alberta and Saskatchewan thermal projects. Remediation of slotted liner wells in cases of erosion, or high gas/steam production later in life requires a different basis of design based on specific well challenges and will be challenged by the additional pressure drops due to poor or variable sand control productivity. Flow Control Devices (FCDs) have demonstrated significant potential for improving recovery in SAGD production wells. FCD experience in SAGD has been primarily positive and most producers performed better with FCDs. While for some operators the results are mixed or negative. The first generation of FCDs deployed in SAGD projects were not designed for such process and in some cases ill-suited. Furthermore, current modeling methods deployed have significant limitations that prevent appropriate FCD design or understanding, and although they can be history matched, typically do not provide useful insight into the pressure drops encountered or held understand the benefit of different devices. In order to design and optimize FCDs for SAGD, it is necessary to characterize different FCDs under the steam-breakthrough condition, and accurately model the flashing in the near wellbore area associated with low-subcool operation. The extensive chocking in FCDs, far greater than initial design, in many cases is due to near-wellbore flashing.
This work is a continuation of three previous parts discussing the liquid pool modeling for SAGD producers (Irani, 2018, 2019 and Irani and Gates, 2018). The purpose of this work is to create a PI that fit for purpose of SAGD liquid pool pre- and post-flashing that mainly can be used for analysis and optimization of FCDs. With FCDs, the draw-down pressure is typically higher, resulting in flashing near the well bore. If there is flashing in the near wellbore area, the temperature gradient within liquid pool yields the saturation curve. The flashing causes the reduction in the relative permeability of the liquid phase, that creates new equilibrium that stabilizes at lower rates. Such new equilibrium analysis is conducted by forcing a new temperature gradient to the model. The main output of such analysis is the produced steam quality at the producer sand-face. The steam quality is an important input for the flow control devices (FCDs) especially at subcool close to the zero, as it controls its behavior. This type of analysis can help the operators evaluate the effectiveness of different type of FCDs, whether they are primarily momentum- or friction-style devices.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||21|
Edmunds, N.R. 2000. Investigation of SAGD Steam Trap Control in Two and Three Dimensions. J Can Pet Technol 39(1): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.2118/00-01-02.
Heidari, M.R., & Nghiem, L.X., 2018. Dynamic Steam-Trap-Control Simulation Technique: Formulation, Implementation, and Performance Analysis. SPE J. 23(6): 2015?2025. https://doi.org/10.2118/182611-PA
Irani, M. and Cokar, M., 2016. Discussion on the Effects of Temperature on Thermal Properties in the Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process. Part 1: Thermal Conductivity, SPE J. 21(2): 334—352. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/178426-PA.
Irani, M., & Ghannadi, S., 2019. On Temperature Fall-Off Interpretation in Circulation Phase of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process. SPE J. 24(3): 1002—1015, http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/189740-PA.
Irani, M., 2013. Understanding the Steam-Hammer Mechanism in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Wells, SPE J. 18(6): 1181?1201. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/165456-PA.
Irani, M., 2018. On Subcool Control in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Producers—Part I: Stability Envelopes, SPE J. 23(3): 841?867. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/187956-PA.
Irani, M., 2019. On Subcool Control in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Producers—Part II: Localized-Hot-Spots Effects and Optimization of Flow-Control Devices, SPE J. 24(4): 1613—1629. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/193369-PA.
Perkins, T. K., 1993. Critical and Subcritical Flow of Multiphase Mixtures Through Chokes, SPE Drilling & Completion, 8(4): 271–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20633-PA.
Stahl, R.M., Smith, J.D., Hobbs, S. and Clarke, C.M., 2014. Application of Intelligent Well Technology to a SAGD Producer: Firebag Field Trial, presented in SPE Heavy Oil Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 10–12, https://doi.org/10.2118/170153-MS
Stone, T.W., Brown, G., Guyaguler, B., Bailey, W.J., & Law, D.H.S., 2011. Practical Control of SAGD Wells with Dual Tubing Strings to Achieve Enhanced Conformance and Production. Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. November 15-17. https://doi.org/10.2118/149352-MS
Stone, T.W., Yardumian, H.E., Bailey, W.J., Damas, C., Naccache, P.F., & Morton, A., 2010. Dynamic SAGD Well Flow Control Simulation. Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, October 19-21, https://doi.org/10.2118/138054-MS
Vachon, G. P., Klaczek, W., Erickson, P. J., Langer, D. C., Booy, D., & Baugh, A., 2015. Use of Flow Control Devices (FCDs) to Enforce Conformance in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Completions, presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 9-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/174416-MS.
Vinsome, K., McGee, B.C.W., Vermeulen, F.E. and Chute, F.S., 1994. Electrical Heating, JCPT, 33(04): 29—36. http://dx.doi:10.2118/94-04-04