Multi-Well Poroelastic Pressure Interference Analysis: Towards Real-Time Fracture Diagnostics
- Ripudaman Manchanda (The University of Texas at Austin) | Brendan Elliott (The University of Texas at Austin) | Puneet Seth (The University of Texas at Austin) | Mukul Sharma (The University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 4-6 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- fracture interference, real time, poroelastic pressure, analytical model, fracture diagnostics
- 343 in the last 30 days
- 346 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Traditionally, time-consuming, numerical simulations are used to calculate and interpret poroelastic pressure changes induced by hydraulic fractures. In this work, we develop and apply semi-analytical models to calculate the poroelastic pressure signature and estimate the geometry of the propagating fracture. The speed of the analytical forward model allows us to apply inverse models (which require the forward model to be run hundreds of times) to compute the fracture geometry in near-real-time.
A 3-D, semi-analytical model is developed to calculate reservoir deformation, stress shadow, and pressure changes around multiple hydraulic fractures. The model is extended and combined with an inversion algorithm to calculate the geometry of the propagating fracture for a measured poroelastic pressure signature recorded in a monitoring well. The model is then applied to a real field scenario with a treatment well and a fractured monitoring well where the pressure signature measured in the monitoring wells is used to estimate the dimensions of the propagating fractures in several fracturing stages.
The analytical model presented here is shown to be very accurate for predicting the stress shadow of multiple propagating fractures. This model is used to quantify the impact of various operational unknowns on the poroelastic pressure signature. We consider scenarios where the pressure change in the monitoring well is measured through isolated fractures in the monitoring well. We demonstrate the impact of the number of propagating fractures, their length, height, net pressure, and the monitoring well fracture geometry on the observed pressure change. Based on this understanding, an inversion algorithm is developed to convert the recorded poroelastic pressure into the dimensions of the propagating fractures and the dimensions of the monitoring fractures. Finally, the method is used to interpret poroelastic pressure measurements recorded in a pair of wells in the Delaware basin to estimate fracture dimensions.
In this work, we showcase the development and application of a novel semi-analytical model to interpret poroelastic pressure signatures observed in isolated monitoring well fractures. The application of the new method to estimate fracture dimensions is shown using a newly developed inversion algorithm. The efficient computations provide clear evidence that the developed workflow can be used for near-real-time fracture diagnostics.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Bommer, P., Bayne, M., Mayerhofer, M., Machovoe, M., Staron, M., 2017. Re-Designing from Scratch and Defending Offset Wells: Case Study of a Six-Well Bakken Zipper Project, McKenzie County, ND, in: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2118/184851-MS
Bommer, P.A., Bayne, M.A., 2018. Active Well Defense in the Bakken: Case Study of a Ten-Well Frac Defense Project, McKenzie County, ND, in: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2118/189860-MS
Daneshy, A.A., 2014. Fracture Shadowing: Theory, Applications and Implications, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 27-29. https://doi.org/10.2118/170611-MS
Elliott, B., Manchanda, R., Seth, P., Sharma, M.M., 2019. Interpreting Inter-Well Poroelastic Pressure Transient Data: An Analytical Approach Validated with Field Case Studies. Unconv. Resour. Technol. Conf. https://doi.org/10.105530/urtec-2019-449
Hwang, J., Szabian, M.J., Sharma, M., 2017. Hydraulic Fracture Diagnostics and Stress Interference Analysis by Water Hammer Signatures in Multi-Stage Pumping Data, in: Proceedings of the 5th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, USA. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2017-2687423
Kahn, C., Cottingham, B., Kashikar, S., Senften, S., Coenen, E., 2018. Rapid evaluation of diverter effectiveness from poroelastic pressure response in offset wells. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconv. Resour. Technol. Conf. 2018, URTC 2018 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2018-2902114
Manchanda, R., Bryant, E.C., Bhardwaj, P., Cardiff, P., Sharma, M.M., 2018. Strategies for Effective Stimulation of Multiple Perforation Clusters in Horizontal Wells. SPE Prod. Oper. 33, 539-556. https://doi.org/10.2118/179126-PA
Manchanda, R., Zheng, S., Gala, D., Sharma, M.M., 2019c. Simulating the Life of Hydraulically Fractured Wells Using a Fully-Coupled Poroelastic Fracture-Reservoir Simulator, in: Proceedings of the 7th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, USA. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-490
Nordgren, R.P., 1972. Propagation of a Vertical Hydraulic Fracture. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 12, 306-314. https://doi.org/10.2118/3009-PA
Roussel, N.P., Agrawal, S., 2017. Introduction to Poroelastic Response Monitoring - Quantifying Hydraulic Fracture Geometry and SRV Permeability from Offset-Well Pressure Data 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2017-2645414
Seth, P., Manchanda, R., Kumar, A., Sharma, M., 2018. Estimating Hydraulic Fracture Geometry by Analyzing the Pressure Interference Between Fractured Horizontal Wells, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/191492-MS
Seth, P., Manchanda, R., Zheng, S., Gala, D., Sharma, M., 2019c. Poroelastic Pressure Transient Analysis: A New Method for Interpretation of Pressure Communication Between Wells During Hydraulic Fracturing, in: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/194358-MS
Spicer, S., Coenen, E., 2018. Estimation of fracture geometries from poroelastic pressure responses in offset wells. SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconv. Resour. Technol. Conf. 2018, URTC 2018 2141-2160. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2018-2886118
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S.J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K.J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A.R.J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C., Polat, I., Feng, Y., Moore, E.W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E.A., Harris, C.R., Archibald, A.M., Ribeiro, A.H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., Contributors, S. 1. 0, 2019. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python 1-22.