Investigating Near-Wellbore Diversion Methods for Refracturing Horizontal Wells
- Junjing Zhang (ConocoPhillips) | Matt White (ConocoPhillips) | Jamie McEwen (ConocoPhillips) | Sam Schroeder (ConocoPhillips) | David D. Cramer (ConocoPhillips)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 4-6 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Diversion, Near Wellbore Diverter, Unconventional Reservoirs, ISIP, Refracturing
- 445 in the last 30 days
- 452 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Near-wellbore diversion of fracturing fluid and proppant is a common objective when refracturing horizontal wells for expanding treatment coverage within the lateral. There are five broad categories of near-wellbore diversion methods: (1) particulate diversion for bridging open fractures connected to the wellbore, (2) perforation sealing to limit injectivity into open perforation clusters at the wellbore, (3) filling up the drained fracture system with water for achieving more uniform pressurization (i.e., fill-up), (4) injection rate cycling/hesitation fracturing and (5) mechanical isolation by installing cemented or expandable liners in the lateral followed by plug and perf stimulation. These tactics can be used in isolation or combined. Particulate diverting agents can be additionally categorized by particle type (e.g., granular, fibrous) and solubility characteristics. Perforation sealing agents consist of deformable and rigid/spherical subtypes, both of which can be further categorized by solubility characteristics.
In this study, treatment and production data for 72 company-operated refractured wells in a North America shale play were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the various near-wellbore diversion methods and materials. An index was formulated using information on reservoir depletion to normalize changes in bottom hole fracture pressure over time. This was determined by periodically discontinuing injection to obtain instantaneous shut in pressures (ISIP’s) over the course of the treatment. The calculated indices were plotted for each type of diverting system to compare trends for gaining insight on in-situ stress buildup. Production data grouped by different diversion methods were also analyzed. The near-wellbore diversion methods included mixed-size particulates with and without fibrous materials, deformable and rigid perforation sealers, fill-up tactics in which near-wellbore diverting agents were not utilized and mechanical isolation by cementing a newly installed liner in the lateral followed by plug and perf stimulation.
Frac hit analysis of offset well treatments indicated that refracturing treatments using particulate diverters were heel biased with respect to reservoir re-pressurization. The study showed that the incremental pressure as a result of diverter landing on perforations is a poor indication of diverter efficiency. Non-normalized ISIP trend is misleading as an indicator for post-refracturing well performance. Refractured wells with either particulate diverters or perforation sealers both show initial fluid fill-up into the depleted region before the stress buildup plateaus. Wells that have liners installed and cemented inside the original wellbore and that are then re-stimulated with standard plug-and-perf techniques show superior performance compared to all other diversion methods. Choice of diversion can have a significant impact on results, but not all particulate diverters or perforation sealers behave similarly. Wells refractured using only the fill-up method have long term productivity on par with or better than wells refractured with most types of diverting agents.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||23|
Cash, R., Zhu, D., & Hill, A. D. 2016. Acid Fracturing Carbonate-Rich Shale: A Feasibility Investigation of Eagle Ford Formation. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference, 24-26 August, Beijing, China. SPE-181805-MS. http://doi:10.2118/181805-MS.
Ciezobka, J., Maity, D., & Salehi, I. 2016. Variable Pump Rate Fracturing Leads to Improved Production in the Marcellus Shale. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 9-11 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-179107-MS. http://doi:10.2118/179107-MS.
Cramer, D. D. 2008. Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Lessons Learned, Successful Practices, Areas for Improvement. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference, 10-12 February, Keystone, Colorado, USA. SPE-114172-MS. http://doi:10.2118/114172-MS.
Cramer, D., Friehauf, K., Roberts, G., & Whittaker, J. 2019. Integrating DAS, Treatment Pressure Analysis and Video-Based Perforation Imaging to Evaluate Limited Entry Treatment Effectiveness. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 5-7 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-194334-MS. http://doi:10.2118/194334-MS.
Emrich, C., Shaw, D., Reasoner, S., & Ponto, D. 2001. Codell Restimulations Evolve to 200% Rate of Return. Presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, 24-27 March, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. SPE-67211-MS. http://doi:10.2118/67211-MS.
French, S., Rodgerson, J., & Feik, C. 2014. Re-fracturing Horizontal Shale Wells: Case History of a Woodford Shale Pilot Project. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 4-6 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-168607-MS. http://doi:10.2118/168607-MS.
Furui, K., Fuh, G.-F., Abdelmalek, N. A., & Morita, N. 2009. A Comprehensive Modeling Analysis of Borehole Stability and Casing Deformation for Inclined/Horizontal Wells Completed in a Highly Compacting Chalk Formation. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 4-7 October, New Orleans, Louisiana. SPE-123651-MS. http://doi:10.2118/123651-MS.
Glasbergen, G., Todd, B. L., Van Domelen, M. S., & Glover, M. D. 2006. Design and Field Testing of a Truly Novel Diverting Agent. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A., 24-27 September 2006. SPE-102606-MS. http://doi:10.2118/102606-MS.
Grieser, B., Calvin, J., & Dulin, J. 2016. Lessons Learned: Refracs from 1980 to Present. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 9-11 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-179152-MS. http://doi:10.2118/179152-MS.
Leonard, R. S., Woodroof, R. A., Senters, C. W., Wood, T. M., & Drylie, S. W. 2016. Evaluating and Optimizing Refracs - What the Diagnostics Are Telling Us. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26-28 September, Dubai, UAE. SPE-181676-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/181676-MS.
Leveille, G. P. 2019. https://static.conocophillips.com/files/resources/2019-02-19-barclays-shale-technology-leveille-fina.pdf. Barclays Shale Oil Technical Teach In.
Lindsay, G. J., White, D. J., Miller, G. A., Baihly, J. D., & Sinosic, B. 2016. Understanding the Applicability and Economic Viability of Refracturing Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Plays. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 9-11 February. SPE-179113-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179113-MS.
Miller, G., Lindsay, G., Baihly, J., & Xu, T. 2016. Parent Well Refracturing: Economic Safety Nets in an Uneconomic Market. Presented at the SPE Low Perm Symposium, 5-6 May, Denver, Colorado, USA. SPE-180200-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180200-MS.
Miller, J. D., Ponto, D. A., & Reasoner, S. J. 2004. Fracturing Fluid Viscosity Profiles Determine Well Productivity in a Remedially Stimulated Tight Gas Reservoir. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26-29 September, Houston, Texas. SPE-90194-MS. http://doi:10.2118/90194-MS.
Pawlik, M., Champagne, J., Whitworth, J., & Trebing, C. 2014. Optimizing Frac Plug Mill Outs in Horizontal Wells using Coiled Tubing. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, 25-26 March, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-168279-MS. http://doi:10.2118/168279-MS.
Pope, C., Charlton, A., Inscore, J., Epperson, R., & Sumner, B. 2017. Stop, Drop and Circulate; An Engineered Approach to Coiled Tubing Drillouts. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 9-11 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA. SPE-187337-MS. http://doi:10.2118/187337-MS.
Raterman, K., Liu, Y., & Warren, L. 2019. Analysis of a Drained Rock Volume: An Eagle Ford Example. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 22-24 July, Denver, Colorado, USA. URTEC-2019-263-MS. http://doi:10.15530/urtec-2019-263.
Ryan, M., Gohari, K., Bilic, J., Livescu, S., Lindsey, B. J., Johnson, A., & Baird, J. 2019. Challenging the Industry’s Understanding of Hole Cleaning During the Drillouts of Frac Plugs with a New Holistic Approach. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September - 2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. SPE-195865-MS. http://doi:10.2118/195865-MS.
Sencenbaugh, R. N., Lytle, D. M., Birmingham, T. J., Simmons, J. C., & Shaefer, M. T. 2001. Restimulating Tight Gas Sand: Case Study of the Codell Formation. Presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, 21-23 May, Keystone, Colorado. SPE-71045-MS. http://doi:10.2118/71045-MS.
Senters, C. W., Johnson, M. D., Leonard, R. S., Ramos, C. R., Squires, C. L., Wood, T. M., & Woodroof, R. A. 2018. Diversion Optimization in New Well Completions. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 23-25 January, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-189900-MS. http://doi:10.2118/189900-MS.
Vincent, M. C. 2010. Refracs: Why Do They Work, and Why Do They Fail in 100 Published Field Studies? Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Florence, Italy, 19-22 September 2010. SPE-134330-MS. http://doi:10.2118/134330-MS.
Wolhart, S. L., McIntosh, G. E., Zoll, M. B., & Weijers, L. 2007. Surface Tiltmeter Mapping Shows Hydraulic Fracture Reorientation in the Codell Formation, Wattenberg Field, Colorado. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 11-14 November, Anaheim, California, U.S.A. SPE-110034-MS. http://doi:10.2118/110034-MS.
Wang, D., Wang, X., Liu, G., & Economides, M. 2012. A New Way of Staged Fracturing Using Ball Sealers. SPE Production & Operations, 27(3): 278 – 283. https://doi.org/10.2118/140529-PA.
Weijers, L., Wright, C., Mayerhofer, M., Pearson, M., Griffin, L., & Weddle, P. 2019. Trends in the North American Frac Industry: Invention through the Shale Revolution. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 5-7 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. SPE-194345-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/194345-MS.
Weng, X., Siebrits, E. 2007. Effect of Production-Induced Stress Field on Refracture Propagation and Pressure Response. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 29-31 January, College Station, Texas, U.S.A. https://doi.org/10.2118/106043-MS.
Whitfield, T., Watkins, M. H., & Dickinson, L. J. 2018. Pre-Loads: Successful Mitigation of Damaging Frac Hits in the Eagle Ford. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 September, Dallas, Texas, USA. SPE-191712-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191712-MS.
Zhang, J., Cramer, D. D., McEwen, J., White, M., & Bjornen, K. 2019. Use of Far-Field Diverters To Mitigate Parent- and Infill-Well-Fracture Interactions in Shale Formations. SPE Production & Operations. July 2019. https://doi.org/10.2118/194329-PA.