Automated Geosteering with Fault Detection and Multi-Solution Tracking
- Stefan Maus (H&P Technologies) | Timothy Gee (H&P Technologies) | Alexander M. Mitkus (H&P Technologies) | Kenneth McCarthy (H&P Technologies) | Eric Charney (H&P Technologies) | Aida Ferro (H&P Technologies) | Qianlong Liu (H&P Technologies) | Jackson Lightfoot (H&P Technologies) | Paul Reynerson (H&P Technologies) | David M. Velozzi (H&P Technologies) | Rocky Mottahedeh (United Oil & Gas Consulting Ltd)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, 3-5 March, Galveston, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition
- Automated Typelog Correlation, Automated Steering, Automated Geosteering, Autonomous Drilling, Logging While Drilling
- 50 in the last 30 days
- 118 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Development of autonomous drilling technologies requires the automated analysis and interpretation of Logging While Drilling (LWD) data to optimally land the well in the target formation and keep it in the pay zone. This paper presents a fully automated geosteering algorithm, which includes advanced LWD filtering, fault detection, correlation, tracking of multiple interpretations with associated probabilities and visualization using novel stratigraphic misfit heatmaps.
Traditional geosteering uses manual stretch, compress and match techniques to correlate measurements along the subject wellbore against corresponding reference type logs. This results in a crude representation of strata by linear sections with offsets at fault locations. Instead of automating this manual process, we instead determine the possible interpretations as solutions of a geophysical inverse problem in which the total misfit between the subject and reference data is minimized. Interpretations are parameterized as discontinuous splines to accurately follow curved strata interjected by fault offsets. To account for ambiguities, multiple possible interpretations are continuously tracked in real time and assigned probabilities based on the misfit between the latest measurements and the reference data. Unrealistic solutions are suppressed by penalizing strong curvature and large fault offsets. Viable interpretations are simultaneously visualized in real time as paths on a novel stratigraphic misfit heat map, where they may be corroborated against valleys of minimal misfit between the subject and reference data. The user can guide the interpretation by setting control points on the heat map which the automated solutions must respect.
The algorithm has been validated using wells from different regions across North America for which previous manual geosteering interpretations are available. The automated spline interpretations represent the actual curved strata more accurately than manual interpretations. Operationally, the automated interpretations can be provided within minutes compared to typical manual turn-around times of hours. Automation leads to more consistent and repeatable results, removing the subjectivity of manual interpretations.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Arbus, T. & S. Wilson (2019, July 24). Cybersteering: Automated Geosteering By Way of Distributed Computing and Graph Databases in the Cloud, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-335.
Bittar, M. and Ahmet Aki, (2015), Advancement and economic benefit of geosteering and well-placement technology, The Leading Edge 34: 524–526, 528–528, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34050524.1
DeVerse, S., & Maus, S. (2016, September 21). Optimizing Lateral Well Spacing by Improving Directional Survey Accuracy. Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/181772-MS
Dupuis, J. and J.-M. Denichou, (2015), Automatic inversion of deep-directional-resistivity measurements for well placement and reservoir description, The Leading Edge 34: 504–506, 508–508, 510–512, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34050504.1
Gremillion, J., Flowers, M., Tvrdy, N., Okoro, M., & Newnam, Z. (2019, July 31). Selection of Logging-While-Drilling Measurements for Geosteering of Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2019-934
Lesso, W.G., and S.V. Kashikar (1996), The Principles and Procedures of Geosteering, IADC/SPE 35051, https://doi.org/10.2118/35051-MS
Maus, S., & DeVerse, S. (2015, July 20). Enhanced Wellbore Placement Accuracy Using Geomagnetic In-Field Referencing and Multi-Station Correction. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2015-2173526
Noynaert, S. F. (2016, August 1). What I Wish My Geologist Knew about Drilling: Geosteering from a Drilling Engineer's Perspective. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2016-2461948
Pitcher, J. and F. Gallice, (2015), Beyond gamma ray: Determining a geosteering program for a new unconventional reservoir, The Leading Edge 34: 514–516, 518–518, 520–520, 522–522, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34050514.1
Torres-Verdín, C., and J. Zhou, (2015), Introduction to this special section: Well geosteering, The Leading Edge 34: 494–494, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34050494.1
Winkler, H. (2017). Geosteering by exact inference on a Bayesian network. Geophysics, Vol. 82, No. 5, P. 279–291, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0569.1
Woodward, R., and Noynaert, S. (2017, July 24). If It's So Easy, Why Don't You Come Do It Yourself? A Response to "What I Wish My Geologist Knew About Drilling: A Drilling Engineer's View of Geosteering"; Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2017-2697532
Zhou, J. (2015), Uncertainty in geosteering and interpretation of horizontal wells — The necessity for constraints and geometric models, The Leading Edge 34: 496–498, 500–500, 502–503, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34050496.1