Special Considerations for Well Tubular Design at Elevated Temperatures
- Gang Tao (C-FER Technologies 1999 Inc.) | Cam Matthews (C-FER Technologies 1999 Inc.) | Adrian Adams (CNOOC International)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, 3-5 March, Galveston, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference and Exhibition
- 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 4.3.4 Scale, 7 Management and Information, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making
- Tubular Design, Elevated Temperature, Finite Element Analysis, Strain Rate, Connection Evaluation
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 117 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Understanding of material properties for tubular design under HPHT conditions goes well beyond the basics of the classic methods routinely employed in the industry. The objective of this paper is to highlight several important characteristics of the stress-strain response of high strength tubular materials which differ at elevated temperatures relative to room temperature, and to demonstrate the significant impact these differences can have on the pipe body strength and connection mechanical/sealability performance under HPHT conditions.
Coupon test results of high strength tubulars commonly used in HPHT wells are presented to demonstrate the key differences in the stress-strain response at elevated temperatures versus room temperature. The tensile tests were also performed in a manner to emphasize the importance of strain rate effect on the material response. Analytical equations are used to demonstrate the strain rate effect on pipe body ductile rupture and collapse strengths. In addition, advanced non- linear Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results are presented to further illustrate the substantial impact that the temperature and rate-dependent material properties have on pipe body and connection performance in HPHT applications.
The coupon test results show a significant change in the tubular material response at elevated temperatures, such as reduction of key mechanical properties (e.g. Young's modulus, yield and ultimate tensile strengths, etc.) and substantial strain rate effects at temperatures representative of HPHT conditions. Calculations using analytical equations provide a quantitative estimation of critical load thresholds, beyond which the structural integrity of tubulars may be subjected to increased failure risk when strain rate effect is not accounted for. Advanced FEA simulations provide a further understanding of the pipe body and connection response under HPHT load conditions. Based on the observations from this study, recommendations are made on a few special considerations in well tubular design for elevated temperature applications. In addition, the findings also provide the basis for a critical discussion of the applicable ASTM/API test standards and the need to understand the effect of different strain/loading rates that may be employed in material characterization and full-scale testing of tubular products at elevated temperatures.
Collectively the information and results presented in the paper are expected to be very useful to the new generation of engineers charged with the tubular design for challenging well applications involving elevated temperature and severe load conditions.
The paper raises an awareness of the importance of considering strain rate effects for tubular design at elevated temperatures. The outcome of this study will also be used to support the recommendation of using a yield strength determination closer to or at the material proportional limit rather than a constant strain value (per API 5CT (2018)) for specifying the load envelope to be employed when qualifying tubular connections for elevated temperature service.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||33|
ASTM E8/E8M-16a, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. 2016. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A.
ASTM E21-17, Standard Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials. 2017. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0021-17.
ASTM E111-17, Standard Test Method for Young's Modulus, Tangent Modulus, and Chord Modulus. 2017. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0111-17.
ASTM E139-11 (2018), Standard Test Methods for Conducting Creep, Creep-Rupture, and Stress-Rupture Tests of Metallic Materials, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International, http://www.astm.org.
ASTM E328-13, Standard Test Methods for Stress Relaxation Tests for Materials and Structures, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, http://www.astm.org.
ASTM A370-16, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products. 2016. Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0370-16.
Castilla, R. 2017. Scatterplot of P-T Conditions for Wells in the Oil Industry (HPHT) and Geothermal Energy. Wikimedia Commons. December. URL:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HPHT-O%26G_and_Geothermal_wells.png
Chaboche, J. L. 2008. A Review of Some Plasticity and Viscoplasticity Constitutive Theories. International Journal of Plasticity 24 (1): 1642-1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.03.009.
Cernocky, E. P., Aaron, V. D., Paslay, P.R.. 2005. Combined Axial Tension/Compression and Internal Pressure Testing of Mini-Pipe Specimens in H2S Environment to Determine Three Dimensional (Triaxial) Stress States which Produce Crack Initiation Failure: Explanation of the New Test Fixture, Mini-Pipe Specimen, and Preliminary Test Results. Paper presented at the SPE High Pressure/High Temperature Sour Well Design Applied Technology Workshop, Woodlands, Texas, USA, 17-19 May. SPE-97577-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/97577-MS.
Ioka, I., Kaji, Y., Miyamoto, Y.. 1992. Creep Collapse of a Heat Transfer Tube Subjected to External Pressure at High Temperatures. Nuclear Engineering and Design 137 (2): 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(92)90024-P.
Kaiser, T. 2005. Post-Yield Material Characterization for Strain-Based Design. SPE J. 14 (1): 128-134. SPE-97730-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/97730-PA.
Kaji, Y., Ioka, I., Nishiguchi, I. and Miyamoto, Y. 1996. Estimation of Creep Buckling Deformation Under External Pressure at Elevated Temperature. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 188 (2): 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2842180.
Klever, F.J. and Toshitaka Tamano, T. 2006. A New OCTG Strength Equation for Collapse Under Combined Loads. SPE Drill & Compl 21 (3): 164-179. SPE-90904-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/90904-PA.
Klever, F.J. and Stewart, G. 1998. Analytical Burst Strength Prediction of OCTG With and Without Defects. Paper presented at SPE Applied Technology Workshop on Risk Based Design of Well Casing and Tubing, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 7-8 May. SPE-48329-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/48329-MS.
Landmark, WellCat Software. 2015. http://www.dnex.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Attachment-2_Landmark-Drilling-Apps-DATASHEET.pdf
Lokna, J. 2014. Evaluation of Work Flow in Drilling and Completion. MSc. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (May 2014). https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/240460/746077_FULLTEXT01.pdf?sequence=1
Maldonado, B. 2005. Special Design Strategies Vital as HPHT Completions Edge Toward 500°F, 30,000 psi. Drilling Contractor, 61 (5): 66-70. URL: https://iadc.org/dcpi/dc-septoct05/Sept05-hpht.pdf
Maruyama, K., Tsuru, E., Ogasawara, M.. 1990. An Experimental Study of Casing Performance Under Thermal Cycling Conditions. SPE Drilling Eng 5 (2): 156-164. SPE-18776-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18776-PA.
Eustes, A., Tutuncu, A., Baker, R.. 2018. Application of Horizontal Well Completion Techniques to Enhanced Geothermal Systems. Final report, Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, Colorado (August 2018). URL:https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/71201.pdf.
Nowinka, J., Kaiser, T. and Lepper, B. 2007. Strain-Based Design of Tubulars for Extreme Service Wells. Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 20-22 February. SPE-105717-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/105717-MS.
Pathak, P. D., Christopher G., Kocurek, C. G.. 2014. Design Method Combining API and ASME Codes for Subsea Equipment for HP/HT Conditions up to 25,000-psi Pressure and 400°F Temperature. Oil and Gas Fac 3 (2): 47-55. SPE-169813-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/169813-PA.
Payne, M. 2010. HP/HT Challenges. J Pet Technol 62 (4): 70. SPE-0410-0070-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0410-0070-JPT.
Rahman, S., Mason, S., Sathuvalli, U. B.. 2018. Tubular Ratings Used in Well Containment Screening Tool. Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 6-8 March. SPE-189690. https://doi.org/10.2118/189690-MS.
Richie, D. A and Rosenfeld, M. J. 2012. Investigation of Temperature Derating Factors for High-Strength Line Pipe. STP-PT-049, ASME Standards Technology LLC, New York, New York. https://www.asme.org/getmedia/3b5dc971-b64e-4c5f-9ac6-fd1e9e995b9d/33292.pdf.
Shadravan, A. and Amani, M. 2012. HPHT 101-What Petroleum Engineers and Geoscientists Should Know About High Pressure High Temperature Wells Environment. Energy Science and Technology 4 (2): 36-60. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.est.1923847920120402.635.
Shahreyar, N. and Finley, D. 2014. Importance of Thermal/Stress Loading Analysis of Tubulars in HPHT Wells. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25-58 March. OTC-24852-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/24852-MS.
Wah, T. and Gregory, R.K. 1961. Creep Collapse of Long Cylindrical Shells Under High Temperature and External Pressure. Journal of the Aerospace Science, 28 (3): 177-188. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8922.
Zhang, Y., Lian, Z., Zhou, M.. 2018. Viscoelastic Behavior of a Casing Material and Its Utilization in Premium Connections in High-temperature Gas Wells. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10 (12): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018817452.