Perforating Crushed Zone Fracture Mechanism
- G. G. Craddock (Halliburton) | Federico Rios (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 19-21 February, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2020. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Laboratory, Perforating, Simulation, Crushed Zone, Fracture
- 29 in the last 30 days
- 29 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Perforations are used to flow hydrocarbons into a well. Impeding that flow are damaged zones from drilling and the crushed zone lining the walls of perforation tunnels into the rock. In addition, charges can affect a region beyond the crushed zone. This region is termed the "fracture damage zone," and the nature of this region is examined in this paper. The fracture damage zone is the area where the concrete model shows altered effects. This region of damage is not necessarily failed, but is the most likely region of fracture. This work discusses the use of a shock hydrocode to delineate this region. Because the hydrocode is a continuous code, specific fracture paths are not predicted. The code is run for big hole (BH). deep penetration (DP), and fracture (Frac) shaped charges. The damaged region is compared for the types of shaped charges. Simulation results indicate that the region of fracture damage follows the bow shock. This semicircular bow shock region continues propagation after the jet has stopped, but eventually diminishes outward from the jet origin. Generally, the BH charge has a wider damage region than the DP charge, with the DP charge damage region being narrower and deeper than the BH (because of the depth of penetration). The damage zone of the Frac charge is between those of the BH and DP charges. In addition, the damaged region may not be sufficiently affected to actually create failure caused by fractures. "Distance" to the fracture limit is characterized. This ready-to-fracture region is discussed in terms of making it a failed fracture region by external influences, such as propellant stimulation.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Craddock, G.G., Wight, J., and Harive, K. 2016. Finite Element Modeling to Determine Perforating Gun Collapse Failure Mode and an Engineered Solution. Paper presented at the SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completion Conference, Galveston, Texas, USA, 14-15 September. SPE-180311-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180311-MS.
Craddock. G.G., Smith, J., and Haggerty, D. 2018. Perforation Crushed Zone Characteristics in a Subsurface Sandstone. Paper presented at the SPE Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 7-9 February. SPE-189483-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189483-MS.
Haimson, B. and Fairhurst, C. 1967. Initiation and Extension of Hydraulic Fractures in Rocks. SPE J. 7 (03): 310–318. SPE-1710-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1710-PA.