Digitally Transforming Front End Decommissioning Planning
- Farzan Marfatia (Ajero Pty Ltd)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Symposium: Decommissioning and Abandonment, 3-4 December, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- digital transformation, software as a service, Decommissioning, front-end planning, comparative assessment
- 25 in the last 30 days
- 26 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
National legislation requires removal of offshore oil and gas assets post cessation of production. However, this legislation is currently being challenged due to; Safety concerns, advances in environmental research, technical challenges, societal and economic impacts.
The Comparative Assessment is one method of addressing these factors. An online platform has been developed for this purpose that uses adapted, industry standards and norms to generate a comprehensive assessment assisting in the development of an auto-generated high-level decommissioning plan with high level cost estimates.
The Comparative Assessment’s seven-stage process is incorporated in the online platform and when utilised in a facilitated ‘HAZID’ style workshop, the platform enables all relevant subject matter experts to complete the assessment in days, in lieu of months of consultancy.
The algorithms development for the online platform includes the implementation of a quantitative Comparative Assessment process with complementing high-level cost estimates in-line with AACE class 4 and ASPE Level 1 estimates.
The cost estimates explore various removal techniques currently used in the industry. These techniques are then analysed by performing sensitivity studies for different removal methodologies, vessel charters and cost variance from actual decommissioning case studies.
In order to improve efficiency in the decommissioning industry, the development of an online platform capable of an industry recognised decision making process and cost of decommissioning will improve planning and assist in assessing the global decommissioning liability.
|File Size||696 KB||Number of Pages||13|
Guidelines for Comparative Assessment in Decommissioning Programmes. (2015). 1st ed. [ebook] London, England: Oil & Gas UK, pp.1–49. Available at: https://oilandgasuk.co.uk/product/en037/ [Accessed 10 Aug. 2018].
BP (2013). NWH Decommissioning Programme- Close Out Report. 1st ed. [ebook] BP. Available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/country-sites/en_gb/united-kingdom/home/pdf/NWH_Decommissioning_Programme_Close_Out.pdf [Accessed 21 Dec. 2018].
Clarksons Platou (2019). Subsea Broker Report. [PDF] BP. Available at: https://www.clarksons.com/services/broking/
Woodliffe, J., 2019. Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Installations in European Waters : The End of a Decade of Indecision?. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, [Online]. 14, 1–10. Available at: https://brill.com/view/journals/estu/14/1/article-p101_5.xml
Hamilton, A. (2019). Owner Cost Estimate Reviews. 1st ed. [ebook] p.15. Available at: http://www.icoste.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/92_FINAL-PAPER-ICEC-2014.pdf [Accessed 21 Aug. 2019].
Nixon, B. (2013). Decommissioning North Sea Giants. Ingenia, [online] (57), pp.13–19. Available at: https://www.ingenia.org.uk/getattachment/Ingenia/Issue-57/Decommissioning-North-Sea-giants/Nixon.pdf [Accessed 10 Dec. 2018].
Premier Oil (2019). Shelley Field Decommissioning Programme - Close Out Report. 1st ed. [ebook] Premier Oil. Available at: http://www.premier-oil.com/premieroil/assets/lib/documents/ShelleyFieldDecommissioningProgramme-CloseOutReport.pdf [Accessed 21 Aug. 2019].
Spirit Energy (2016). Rose Decommissioning Close-Out Report. 1st ed. [ebook] Aberdeen, UK: Spirit Energy. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/745345/Rose_Close_Out_Report.pdf [Accessed 14 Dec. 2018].