Water Shut-Off with Polymer in the Alvheim Field
- Kåre Langaas (Aker BP ASA) | Arne Stavland (Norwegian Research Centre)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 3-6 June, London, England, UK
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3 Production and Well Operations, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 5.5.8 History Matching, 3.5.5 Water Shut-off, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.3.6 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 3.5 Well Intervention, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment
- disproportionate permeability reduction, eor, water shut-off, biopolymer, polymer
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 183 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The Alvheim field, offshore Norway, has subsea wells with long horizontal branches completed with sand screens. After 10 years of production, water production starts to constrain the oil production. Mechanical water shut-off is impossible in these wells, hence other methods are of interest. In a well workover in 2013, two high-viscous polymer pills were bull-headed and squeezed into the reservoir. The well productivity was reduced with around 50% while the water-cut dropped and pointed to potentially 3 mmstb of extra oil recovery. A research study was initiated with the objectives to understand the changed well performance and if polymer bull-heading can be a future method to reduce water production and enhance oil production.
An experimental laboratory program started with filtration tests of polymer solutions based on the polymer used in the well operation. Core flood experiments were performed by injecting polymer into two parallel mounted cores, then back producing these individually with either water or oil. Several combinations of parallel cores were tested with polymer injection: high vs. low permeability, high oil saturation vs. low oil saturation, outcrop sandstone vs. Alvheim core, as well as two different polymer versions.
The polymer recipe as used in the well operation showed to plug standard filters with filter size larger than the reservoir pore sizes but did not plug the cores. The polymer recipe as used in the well gave a better disproportionate permeability reduction (DPR) than the alternative polymer variant with similar viscosity. A theoretical model for the shear rate in the porous media matched the experimental measured data excellent. The core results show a stable permeability reduction factor of 100-450 for water, while only a factor 2-10 and decreasing with time for oil. The achieved DPR ratio of 45-80 is better than the trend from earlier published results.
The DPR as measured in the laboratory was next integrated in the reservoir model as part of the history match of the treated well. The Alvheim field has several reservoir zones separated with thin shales, and this reservoir zonation seems key for this EOR method to work.
The laboratory work, the reservoir studies and the field experience all point to a possible robust and simple EOR method for Alvheim and similar oil fields. The polymer seems to act as a "magic filter", allowing oil to pass while not water. Future work includes more research and maturing a new polymer pilot on Alvheim.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||23|
Kalfayan, L. J., and Dawson, J.C. 2004. Successful Implementation of Resurgen Permeability Modifiers (RPM) Technology in Well Treatments Requires Realistic Expectations. Paper SPE 90430 presented at the SPE ATCE, Houston, Texas, U.S.A, 26-29 September. SPE-90430-MS. DOI:10.2118/90430-MS.
Langaas, K. and Hjellbakk, A. 2015. Integrated Reservoir Modelling of the Alvheim Field. Paper SPE 173875 presented at the SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 22 April. https://doi.org/10.2118/173875-MS.
Langaas, K., Hjellbakk, A., Leonthin, M. A.. 2016. Making a cross-flow water injector in the Alvheim Field. Paper SPE 181489 presented at the SPE ATCE, Dubai, UAE, 26-28 September. https://doi.org/10.2118/181489-MS
Langaas, K., Jeurissen, E. J. W. G., and Abay, H. K. 2018. Combining Passive and Autonomous Inflow-Control Devices in a Trilateral Horizontal Well in the Alvheim Field, SPEPO Dec 2018. SPE-187288-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/187288-PA.
Morgan, J., Gunn, A., Fitch, G.. 2002. Development and Deployment of a "Bullheadable" Chemical System for Selective Water shut off leaving Oil/Gas Production Unharmed. Paper SPE 78540 presented at the 10th Abu Dhabi International Exhibition and Conference, 13-18 October. SPE-78540-MS. DOI:10.2118/78540-MS.
Seright, R. S. 2009. Disproportionate Permeability Reduction With Pore-Filling Gels. SPEJ March 2009. SPE-99443-PA. DOI:10.2118/99443-PA.
Stavland, A., Ekrann, S., Hettervik, K. O.. 1998. Disproportionate Permeability Reduction Is Not a Panacea. SPEREE 1 (4): 359-366. SPE-50983-PA. DOI:10.2118/50983-PA.
Stavland, A. and Nilsson, S. 2001. Segregated Flow is the Governing Mechanism of Disproportionate Permeability Reduction in Water and Gas Shutoff. Paper SPE 71519 presented at SPE ATCE, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September-3 October. doi:10.2118/71510-MS.
Stavland, A., Andersen, K. I., Sandøy. 2006. How To Apply a Blocking Gel System for Bullhead Selective Water Shutoff: From Laboratory to Field. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Paper SPE 99729 presented at SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 22-26 April. doi:10.2118/99729-MS
Stavland, A. 2010. How to Apply the Flow Velocity as a Design Criterion in RPM Treatments. SPEPO 25 (02). SPE-121850-PA. doi:10.2118/121850-PA.
Sydansk, R. D. and Southwell. G. P. 2000. More Than 12 Years Experience With a Successful Conformance-Control Polymer-Gel Technology. SPEPF 15 (4) 270-278. SPE-66558-PA. DOI:10.2118/66558-PA.
Sydansk, R. D. and Seright, R. S. 2007. When and Where Relative Permeability Modification Water-Shutoff Treatments Can Be Successfully Applied, SPEPO 22 (02). SPE-99371-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/99371-PA.
Zaitoun, A., Kohler, N., Bossie-Codreanu, D.. 1999. Water Shutoff by Relative Permeability Modifiers: Lessons from Several Field Applications. Paper SPE 56740 presented at the SPE ATCE, Houston, Texas, USA, 3-6 October. SPE-56740-MS. DOI:10.2118/56740-MS.