The Impact of Re-Injecting Flowback Fluids on Formation Damage. Case Study: Marcellus Shale
- Lifu Zhang (Texas A&M University) | Michael Tice (Texas A&M University) | Berna Hascakir (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Western Regional Meeting, 23-26 April, San Jose, California, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 1.8 Formation Damage, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2 Well completion, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design
- Flowback Water Re-Injection, Marcellus Shale Formation, Water-Rock Interaction, Formation Damage
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 130 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Reuse of flowback water in hydraulic fracturing is usually used by industry to reduce consumption, transportation and disposal cost of water. But because of complex interactions between injected water and reservoir rocks, induced fractures may be blocked by impurities carried by flowback and mineral precipitation by water-rock interactions, which causes formation damage. Therefore, knowledge of flowback water-rock interactions is important to understand the changes within the formation and effects on hydraulic fracturing performance.
This study focuses on investigating flowback water-rock interactions during hydraulic fracturing in Marcellus Shale Formation. Simple deionized water-rock interactions and complicated flowback water-rock interactions were studied under static and dynamic conditions. In static experiments, crushed reservoir rock samples were exposed to water for three weeks at room condition. In the dynamic experiment, continuous water flow interacted with rock samples through the core-flooding experimental system for three hours at reservoir condition. Before and after experiments, rock samples were characterized to determine the change on the rock surfaces. Water samples were analyzed to estimate the particle precipitation tendency and potential to modify flow pathway.
Surface elemental concentrations, mineralogy and SEM images of rock samples were characterized. Ion contents, particle size, TDS and Zeta potential in the water samples were analyzed. In both static and dynamic experiments, compared with deionized water-rock interaction, rock samples after being exposed to flowback water show change in the elemental compositions, more fine particles attachment and new minerals detected on rock surface due to effect of flowback water. In produced water, Na, Sr and Cl are extremely high after flowback water-rock interactions because of flowback water contamination. Water parameter analysis indicates after flowback water-rock interactions, suspensions in produced water have highest precipitation tendency because of extremely highest TDS, largest particle size and lowest absolute Zeta potential relative to all water samples. Therefore, according to rock and water characterization, if flowback water without any treatment would be reused in the field hydraulic fracturing operation, created flow pathways and pores are more likely to be blocked and formation damage will be caused.
This study provides information on comparison between deionized water-rock interaction and flowback water interaction. The information enhances the understanding of basic water-rock interaction mechanisms and evaluates formation damage caused by reuse of flowback water.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Abrams, A. 1977. Mud Design to Minimize Rock Impairment Due To Particle Invasion. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/5713-PA
Ali, M., Hascakir, B., 2017. Water-Rock Interaction for Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Green River, and Barnett Shale Samples and Implications for Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Engineering, SPE Journal, 22, 01, 162-171, SPE-177304-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/177304-PA
Ali, M., Banerjee, S., Hascakir, B. 2016. Produced Water Management for Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/184139-MS
Avary, K.L., and Lewis, J.E., 2008, New interest in cores taken thirty years ago: the Devonian Marcellus Shale in northern West Virginia: http://www.papgrocks.org/avary_pp.pdf, accessed September 2016.
Gandossi, Luca; Von Estorff, Ulrik. 2015. An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production - Update 2015 (PDF). Scientific and Technical Research Reports (Report). Joint Research Centre of the European Commission; Publications Office of the European Union.
Gros N. 2003. Ion Chromatographic Analyses of Sea Waters, Brines and Related Samples. Water 2013, 5, 659-676; doi:10.3390/w5020659
Guerra, K., Drewes, J. 2008. Produced Water in the Western United States: Geographical Distribution, Occurrence, and Composition. Environmental Engineering Science - ENVIRON ENG SCI. 25. 239-246. 10.1089/ees.2007.0026.
International Energy Agency. 2013. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 - EIA. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf
International Energy Agency. 2014. Annual Energy Outlook 2014 - EIA https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2014).pdf
International Energy Agency. 2016. Annual Energy Outlook 2014 - EIA. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2016).pdf
Jarvie, D. M., R. J. Hill, T. R. Ruble, and R. M. Pollastro. 2007. Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment: AAPG Bulletin, v. 91, no. 4, p. 475-499, doi:10.1306
Kar, T., Ovalles C., Rogel, E., Vien, J., Hascakir, B. 2016. The residual oil saturation determination for Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Solvent-SAGD. Fuel. 172. 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.029.
Kar, T., Hascakir, B. 2017. In-situ Kerogen Extraction via Combustion and Pyrolysis. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Volume 154, 2017, Pages 502-512, ISSN 0920-4105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.051.
Kar, T., Mukhametshina, A., Unal, Y., Hascakir, B. 2015. The Effect of Clay Type on Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Performance. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/173795-PA
Lippes J, R. 2015. Environmental Concerns Resulting from Horizontal Drilling. https://flimarcellusconference.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/environmental-concerns-resulting-from-horizontal-drilling1.pdf
Lustgarten, Abrahm. 2012. Injection Wells: The Poison beneath Us. ProPublica, www.propublica.org/article/injection-wells-the-poison-beneath-us.