Synergistic Effect between Surfactant and Nanoparticles on the Stability of Methane Foam in EOR Processes
- Chen Qian (University of Calgary) | Ali Telmadarreie (University of Calgary) | Mingzhe Dong (University of Calgary) | Steven Bryant (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Western Regional Meeting, 23-26 April, San Jose, California, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2 Well completion, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors
- Nanoparticles, Foam-oil interaction, Methane foam, Mobility control, Foam EOR
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 174 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The major challenge in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by gas injection is poor volumetric sweep efficiency, mainly due to the high gas mobility and reservoir heterogeneity. Injecting gas as a foam increases sweep efficiency, but maintaining foam stability within the reservoir remains a challenge. This research evaluates the synergistic interaction of one type of nanoparticle and a surfactant to increase foam stability, using the concentration ratio of the two components to tune the affinity of the nanoparticle for the gas/liquid interface. We test the capability of the synergistic two-component system to stabilize methane foam and compare it with foam stabilized by surfactants only. A key distinction is the foam stability upon contact with oil, and we explain the observations in static and dynamic conditions.
Foam stability was measured both in static (foam height) and dynamic (flow through porous media) conditions. In the static test, foam is generated by the shaking method, and foam texture (bubble size and shape) and the decay of foam height with time are indicators of foam stability. To test static stability in presence of oil, heavy oil is injected into the foam-liquid interface. In dynamic test, foam is pre-generated before flowing at elevated pressures into sandpacks containing various oil saturations. Normalized pressure gradient, and apparent viscosity are the indicators of foam stability and effectiveness for improving oil recovery.
The extent to which nanoparticles are covered with surfactant governs the foam stability both in static and dynamic conditions. Static foam is stable in the presence of oil only if the nanoparticles are partially covered by the surfactant. In the dynamic test, foam stabilized with the only surfactant collapses in the porous media when oil is present. Nanoparticles alone could not generate foam regardless of the presence of oil, but foam stabilized with nanoparticles partially covered by surfactant is stable in the presence of both residual and initial oil. In both static and dynamic conditions, nanoparticles completely covered with a bilayer of surfactant do not stabilize foam in the presence of oil. Partially covered nanoparticles foam also demonstrated salt tolerance in both static and dynamic test. Thus at appropriate surface coverage, the combination of nanoparticles and surfactant is more effective than either stabilizer alone.
The result shows that surfactant and nanoparticles interaction is important in foam stability in the porous media with oil. In particular, this interaction is synergistic at certain coverage. This type of synergy can provide much more robust mobility control for EOR processes involving gas injection.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Emrani, A. S., & Nasr-El-Din, H. A. (2017, April 1). Stabilizing CO2 Foam by Use of Nanoparticles. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/174254-PA.
Hirasaki, G. J., & Lawson, J. B. (1985, April 1). Mechanisms of Foam Flow in Porous Media: Apparent Viscosity in Smooth Capillaries. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/12129-PA