Proppant Transport and Behavior in Horizontal Wellbores Using Low Viscosity Fluids
- Faraj A. Ahmad (Colorado School of Mines) | Jennifer L. Miskimins (Colorado School of Mines)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 5-7 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2 Well completion, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 2.2.2 Perforating, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 3 Production and Well Operations, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- Proppnat transport, Proppnat behavior, Proppant distribution, Settling velocity, Low viscoisty fluid
- 430 in the last 30 days
- 430 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
One of the most significant components of hydraulic fracturing modeling is the prediction of proppant transport in both the wellbore and fractures, as the resulting conductivity has a great impact on post treatment production. In multistage horizontal well treatments, the distribution of proppant between multiple perforation clusters has a substantial impact on treatment behaviors and results. If the proppant is not evenly distributed between the perforation clusters, the perforated intervals will not be equally stimulated. Only a few studies evaluating proppant transport in horizontal wellbores are found in the literature. This paper aims to investigate the parameters that have a large influence on the proppant settling in the wellbore and distribution of the proppants between perforation clusters, as well as providing insight into post-treatment flowback behaviors.
The approach to this work uses a model of a horizontal wellbore with three perforation clusters at shot densities of 4 SPF with 90-degree phasing. Fresh water was used as a carrier fluid to transport the proppant in the horizontal pipe. Two different types of proppants, sand and ultra-light-weight ceramic, of varying mesh sizes were used. Two design parameters, injection rate and proppant concentration, have been varied throughout the experimental tests.
The results from this work demonstrate that proppant settling velocity in the wellbore is different for each type of proppant. These differences are mainly due to the changes in the proppant concentration as well as the changes in the size and shape of proppant particles. The uneven proppant distribution between perforation clusters was mostly observed in cases where the density of proppnat was relatively high and at low flow rates. However, at high flow rates, the toe cluster received the largest amount of proppant. This occurs because the high flow rates near the first and second clusters prevent the proppant particles from turning into the perforation tunnels. The ultra-light weight ceramic shows the most even distribution between the perforation clusters since the density difference between the carrier fluid and the proppant particle is relatively low. The most significant finding is that the low viscosity fluid (fresh water) is not an effective transport system for larger particles with relatively high densities.
The results obtained from this study can be used to improve the understanding of good practices of fracture stimulation flushing, as well as proppant distribution/deposition throughout the horizontal pipe during the fracture stimulation treatment and during flowback processes.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Alotaibi, M.A. and Miskimins, J.L. 2015. Slickwater Proppant Transport in Complex Fractures: New Experimental Findings and Scalable Correlation. Presented at the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas. 28-30 September. SPE-174828-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174828-MS.
Al-Tailji, W.H., Northington, N., Conway, M.T. and Davidson, B.M. 2014. Minimizing Over-Flush Volumes at the End of Fracture-Stimulation Stages - An Eagle Ford Case Study. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 27-29 October. SPE-170743-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170743-MS.
Biot, M.A. and Medlin, W.L. 1985. Theory of Sand Transport in Thin Fluids. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, NV, 22-25 September. SPE-14468-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/14468-MS.
Crespo, F., Aven, N.K., Cortez, J., Soliman, M.Y., Bokane, A., Jain, S. and Deshpande, Y. 2013. Proppant Distribution in Multistage Hydraulic Fractured Wells: A Large-Scale Inside-Casing Investigation. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference held in The Woodlands, Texas. 4-6 February. SPE-163856-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163856-MS.
Fisher, M.K., Heinze, J.R., Harris, C.D., Davidson, B.M., . 2004. Optimizing Horizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 26-29 September. SPE-90051-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/90051-MS
Gruesbeck, C. and Collins, R.E. 1982. Particle Transport Through Perforations. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 22 (6): 857 - 865. SPE-7006-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/7006-PA
Harris, P.C., Morgan, G. and Heath, J. 2005. Measurement of Proppant Transport of Fracturing Fluids. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas. 9-12 October. SPE-95287-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/95287-MS.
Liang, F.. 2016. A comprehensive review on proppant technologies, Petroleum, Volume 2, Issue 1, March 2016, Pages 26-39, ISSN 2405-6561, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2015.11.001.
Penny, G.S., Zelenev, A.S., Long, W., Lett, N.L. and Crafton, J.W. 2012. Laboratory and Field Evaluation of Proppants and Surfactants used in Fracturing of Hydrocarbon Rich Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas. 8-10 October. SPE-159692-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/159692-MS.
Roodhart, L.P. 1985. Proppant Settling in Non-Newtonian Fracturing Fluids. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Presented at the SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado. 19-22 March. SPE-13905-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/13905-MS.
Warpinski, N.R., Mayerhofer, M.J., Vincent, M.C., Cipolla, C.L. and Lolon, E.P. 2009. Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 10-12 February. SPE-114173-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/114173-MS.
Wutherich, K.D and Walker, K.J., 2012. Designing Completions in Horizontal Shale Gas Wells Perforation Strategies. Presented at the Americas Unconventional Resources Conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5-7 June. SPE-155485-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/155485-MS.