ESP Water Injector Well with Injection Pressure Available for Real-Time Monitoring Recovered 30% of Production in Low Producer Wells: Case Study
- Diego Cueva (Enap Sipec) | Dorian Jaramillo (Enap Sipec) | Jorge Luis Villalobos (Schlumberger) | David Amores (Schlumberger) | Alejandro Sotomayor (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Middle East Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition, 28-29 November, Manama, Bahrain
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- time, well, Injection, ESP, real
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 58 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
In Ecuador, the fields are getting more challenging in terms of reservoir depletion. Inchi field is an example of such a field in which the production is normally obtained using electric submersible pumps (ESP), with a fast production decline. The wells start with production rates of 1,000 BOPD, and immediately production and pump intake pressure begin to decrease, thus requiring a secondary recovery technique such as water injection. However, the water to inject at required pressure is not always available, andspecial facilities are required to execute this operation, which increasescapital expenditures (CAPEX). Using a new approach that used the advantages of ESP sensors and operational flexibility, a production well was selected and converted to an injection well thus avoiding the high investments in surface facilities and making the secondary recovery a feasible option for low-producing wells.
The Inchi A8 well on the Inchi A pad, was converted toa production injection well due to lack of available water in the field and production facilities. The paper includes an analysis of the completion design, ESP design, sensor installation modification for real-time injection pressure monitoring, ESP performance, injection stimulation, and results with the performance analysis for production recovery of nearby wells. The experience shared in this paper will let the reader understand the challenges for installation of a production injection well driven by the specific needs for and the advantages of injection pressure monitoring.
After the installation of the production injection completion, the decrease in production and reservoir pressure stopped, the production in the field increased up to 166 BFPD in the Inchi 01 and Inchi A5 wells, the flowing bottomhole pressure has increased inan average of 100 psi in the wells Inchi 01 and Inchi A5, and in the well Inchi B6 the flowing bottomhole pressure is steady now closed to 600 psi (before was constantly decreasing). The injection pressure monitoring has been useful especially during the injection pressure tests performed by a testing unit, which allows to check the actual injection index of the reservoir. The savings associated with the installation of the production injection well include eliminating the need for additional surface facilities, a pipeline to bring water from the main station, and the construction of the water treatment plant in the location.
This paper presents a design guideline for future production injection well applications, the benefits to in having a real-time injection pressure monitoring, and the way to usea conventional ESP discharge pressure to monitor the injection pressure and its performance.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|