A Numerical Comparison and Uncertainty Analysis of Two Transient Models for Kick Management in a Backpressure MPD System
- D. Gomes (University of Stavanger) | J. Frøyen (SINTEF) | K. K. Fjelde (University of Stavanger) | Knut Bjørkevoll (SINTEF)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Norway One Day Seminar, 18 April, Bergen, Norway
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 1.7 Pressure Management, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 1.7.2 Managed Pressure Drilling, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation
- Managed pressure drilling, Kick simulations, Kick Management, Transient Modelling, Uncertainty Analysis
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 102 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The objective is to compare two different transient models for evaluating kick management in backpressure managed pressure drilling systems and to analyse numerical uncertainties and impact on simulation results.
Two different numerical methods will be compared with respect to how accurate they describe the maximum surface rates occurring during a kick scenario with water based mud. The importance of being aware of the uncertainty in results due to numerical diffusion is demonstrated. In addition, different techniques for reducing the numerical diffusion will be discussed and the impact on the predicted rates will be demonstrated. This will include a study of grid refinement and application of front tracking or slope limiter techniques. In addition, a comparison of a kick in oil based mud vs. water based mud in a HPHT MPD scenario will also be shown to highlight the main difference between these systems.
A backpressure managed pressure drilling system makes it possible to manage small pressure margins since bottomhole pressure can be controlled by choke pressure adjustments. However, when operating close to pore pressure, small kicks can be taken. These influxes can be circulated to surface if the surface equipment can handle the pressure and the mud gas separator have sufficient capacity. How large kicks one can handle is a decision that can be supported by transient simulations. Here it will be demonstrated that it is important to be aware of and reduce the numerical diffusion to improve prediction of the maximum rates that will occur. It will be shown that by increasing number of boxes in the discretization and introducing methods for reducing numerical diffusion, a more accurate prediction of the maximum rates occurring can be obtained.
The main contribution of this work will be to make engineers aware of that there can be uncertainties involved in the simulation tools they are using and to share knowledge about how one can reduce those uncertainties.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Bjørkevoll, K.S., Hovland, S., Aas, I.B. and Vollen, E.. 2010. Successful Use of Real Time Dynamic Flow Modelling to Control a Very Challenging Managed Pressure Drilling Operation in the North Sea. Paper SPE/IADC 130311 presented at the 2010 SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 24-25 February.
Evje, S. and Fjelde, K.K. 2002. Hybrid Flux-Splitting Schemes for a Two-Phase Flow Model. J. Computational Physics 175(2) 674–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6962.
Fernandes, A.A., Tomita, R.A., Junior, A.C.R., Abdu, J.P.S., Vanni, G.S., Grandi, R.F., Longo, L.G, Machado, G.F., Agostini, C.E., Vadinal, R.B and Silva L.F.M. 2017. Overview of Different Applications for MPD and MCD Techniques on Deepwater Wells. Paper SPE/IADC 185279 presented at the 2017 IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations Conference % Exhibition, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 28-29 March.
Ekrann, S. and Rommetveit, R. 1985. A Simulator for Gas Kicks in Oil-Based Drilling Muds. 60th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of Society of Petroleum Engineers. Las Vegas, NV September 22-25. SPE 14182-MS. doi:10.2118/14182-MS
Hasan, A.R., Kabir, C.S., Sayarpour, M. 2007. A Basic Approach to Wellbore Two-Phase Flow Modeling. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November. SPE-109868-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/109868-MS.
Gabaldon, O.R., Brand, P.R., Culen, M.S, Haq, I.U., Gonzales-Luis, R.A, Pinheiro Da Silva, T., Puerto, G and Bacon, W. 2017.Case Study: First Experience of Developing an Influx Management Envelope IME for a Deepwaer MPD Operation. Paper SPE/IADC 185289 presented at the 2017 IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 28-29 March.
Gedge, B., Singh, H.K.D., Refugio, E., Quoc, B.T. and Bot, N.V. 2013. Managed Pressure Drilling - A Solution for Drilling the Challenging and UnDrillable Wells in Vietnam and South East Asia. Paper SPE 165775 presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 22-24 October.
Johnson, A.,Rezmer-Cooper, I., Bailey, T., McCann, D. 1995. Gas Migration: Fast, Slow or Stopped. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 28 February-2 March.SPE/IADC29342- MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/29342-MS (NB WE MIGHT NEED THIS WHEN DISCUSSING THE GAS END)
Malloy, P., Stone, R.Medley, G.H., Hannegan, D., Cooker, O., Reitsma, D., Santos, H., Kinder, J., Eck Olsen, J., McCaskill, J. May, J., Smith, K. and Sonnemann, P. 2009. Managed-Pressure Drilling: What It Is and What It Is Not. Paper IADC/SPE 122281, presented at the IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 12-13 February.
Lage, A.C.V.M and Time, R.W. 2000. An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Upward Two- Phase Flow in Annuli. Paper SPE 64525, presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 16-18 October. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/64525-MS.
Lorentzen, R.J. and Fjelde, K.K. 2005. Use of Slopelimiter Techniques in Traditional Numerical methods for Multi-phase Flow in Pipelines and Wells. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 48(7): 723–745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fld.952.
Nickens, H.V. A Dynamic Computer Model of a Kicking Well. June 1987. SPE Drilling Engineering. 2(2):159–173. SPE-14183-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14183-PA.
Petersen, J., Rommetveit, R., Bjørkevoll, K.S and Frøyen, J. 2008. A General Dynamic Model for Single and Multi-Phase Flow Operations during Drilling, Completion, Well Control and Intervention. SPE 114688-MS presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Indonesia, 25-27 August.
Syltøy, S., Eide, S.E., Torvund, S., Berg, P.C, Larsen, T., Fjeldberg, H., Bjørkevoll, K.S., McCaskill, J.Prebensen, O.I. and Low, E. 2008. Highly Advanced Multitechnical MPD Concept Extends Achievable HPHT Targets in the North Sea. Paper SPE/IADC 114484 presented at the 2008 SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 28-29 January.
Udegbunam, J.E., Fjelde, K.K., Evje, S., Nygaard, G. June 2015. On the Advection-Upstream-Splitting Method Hybrid Scheme: A Simple Transient Flow Model for Managed-Pressure-Drilling and Underbalanced-Drilling Applications. SPE Drilling & Completion 30(2): 98–108. SPE-168960-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168960-PA.
Zuber, N and Findlay, J.A., 1965: "Average Volumetric Concentration in 2-Phase Flow Systems", J. Heat Transfer. 87 (4) http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3689137