Experimental Study of Surfactant Polymer for a Heavy Oil Field in South of Oman
- R. Al-Jabri (Petroleum Development of Oman) | A. Alkindi (Petroleum Development of Oman) | R. Al-Mjeni (Petroleum Development of Oman) | N. Al-Azri (Petroleum Development of Oman) | D. Rousseau (IFP Energies nouvelles & The EOR Alliance) | S. Renard (IFP Energies nouvelles & The EOR Alliance) | V. Miralles (Solvay & The EOR Alliance) | E. Delamaide (IFP Technologies Canada Inc. & The EOR Alliance)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, 26-28 March, Muscat, Oman
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 7 Management and Information, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 5.2 Fluid Characterization, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 2 Well completion, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.3.6 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- surfactant, lab study, surfactant-polymer, EOR, heavy oil
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 202 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Heavy oil reservoirs remain challenging for surfactant-based EOR, particularly in selecting fine-tuned chemical formulations which combine high performance and guarantee trouble-free operations. This requires substantial laboratory work and a solid methodology. This paper reports a laboratory feasibility study aiming at designing a surfactant-polymer pilot for a heavy oil field in the South of Oman.
The workflow was organized as follows: (i) oilfield initial assessments; (ii) selection and preparation of the rock and fluids; (iii) initial design of the surfactant-polymer formulation involving an extensive screening of surfactants and polymer combinations using a robotic platform; (iv) pre-qualification tests involving in-vitro adsorption and assays for emulsion risk at surface conditions; (v) demonstration coreflood test aiming at determining the ultimate oil recovery achievable with the formulation and (vi) optimization study involving coreflood test and formulation fine tuning to design the most adapted injection strategy.
An extensive screening study was carried out to select representative core and fluid materials. To enable comparative coreflood tests, an analogue granular porous medium was built, with mineralogical composition mimicking that of the reservoir rock. The design of the surfactant-polymer formulation relied on hundreds of automated salinity screening phase behavior and solubility assays. Polymer selection was achieved by membrane injection tests performed under imposed velocity conditions to determine resistance factors versus pore size, velocity, concentration and salinity. This procedure resulted in the successful design of a surfactant-polymer formulation that provided o/w IFT of less than 10-2 mN/m at 50°C over a relatively broad range of salinities, including the injection water salinity. A first coreflood test performed on a reservoir rock plug demonstrated that injecting the formulation as an infinite slug in post-polymer flooding conditions led to 100% recovery of the remaining oil with a very good in-depth propagation of the formulation. The optimization study was then carried out and led to designing injection sequences that allowed minimizing the surfactant losses due to both retention on the rock and dissolution in oil.
The results demonstrate that a surfactant-polymer formulation can successfully be designed and evaluated for heavy oil reservoirs. They also provide practical guidelines for the pilot implementation and pave the way for the next stage of the feasibility study which will focus on generating data for reservoir simulation, operational design and improving the economics.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||21|
Delamaide E. 2017, Investigation on the Impact of Voidage Replacement Ratio and Other Parameters on the Performances of Polymer Flood in Heavy Oil Based on Field Data, SPE 185574 Ferrell H.H. et al. 1984, Progress Report: Big Muddy Field Low-Tension Flood Demonstration Project With Emphasis on Injectivity and Mobility, SPE 126862 Hirasaki, G.J. 2011. Recent Advances in Surfactant EOR, SPE 115386
Hirasaki, J.G. 1983. Evaluation of the Salinity Gradient Concept in Surfactant Flooding, SPE 8825 Hocine S. et al. 2014, New Insights on Chemical EOR Processes for Heavy Oil, SPE 170143 Hunter K.D. et al 2013, The Use of Modeling and Monitoring to Control Scale in Alberta ASP Floods, SPE 165285 Levitt, D.B. et al 2009. Identification and Evaluation of High-Performance EOR Surfactants, SPE 100089 McInnis L.E. et al 2013, Case Study of the Taber Mannville B ASP Flood, SPE 165264
Morvan M. 2008, A combinatorial approach for identification of performance EOR surfactants, SPE 113705 Rousseau D. et al. 2018, Designing Surfactant-Polymer Processes for Heavy Oil Reservoirs: Case Studies, SPE 189745 Salager J.L. 1979, Optimum formulation of surfactant/water/oil systems or minimum interfacial tension or phase behavior, SPE 7054
Somasundaran, P. 1985. Adsorption/Desorption of sulfonates by reservoir rock minerals in solutions of varying sulfonate concentrations, SPE 10603 Tabary, R. et al 2012. Design of a Surfactant/Polymer Process in a Hard Brine Context : A Case Study Applied to Bramberge Reservoir, SPE 155106 Tay, A. et al 2015. Adsorption Inhibitors: A new Route to Mitigate Adsorption in Chemical EOR, SPE 174603 Vonnegut B. 1942. "Rotating Bubble Method for the Determination of Surface and Interfacial Tensions". Rev. Sci. Instrum. 13 (6)